\n\u201cThe domestic violence in this country is rampant and several women encounter violence in some form or the other or almost every day, however, it is the least reported form of cruel behavior. A woman resigns her fate to the never-ending cycle of enduring violence and discrimination as a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, a partner or a single woman in her lifetime.\u201d <\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Officers designated under Section 53 of the NDPS Act are \u201cPolice Officer\u201d within the meaning of section 25 of the Evidence Act; SC holds in 2:1 verdict<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\u201cIt would be remarkable that if a police officer, properly so-called, were to \u201cinvestigate\u201d an offence under the NDPS Act, all the safeguards contained in sections 161 to 164 of the CrPC would be available to the accused, but that if the same police officer or other designated officer under section 42 were to record confessional statements under section 67 of the NDPS Act, these safeguards would be thrown to the winds.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Hathras Gang Rape| CRPF to provide security to the victim\u2019s family & witnesses; SC says apprehensions are not without justification<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201c\u2026 without casting any aspersions on the security personnel of the State Police; in order to allay all apprehensions and only as a confidence building measure, we find it appropriate to direct that the security to the victim\u2019s family and the witnesses shall be provided by the CRPF within a week from today.\u201d <\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Shaheen Bagh Protests| Democracy and dissent go hand in hand but public spaces cannot be occupied indefinitely for expressing dissent<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cDemocracy and dissent go hand in hand, but then the demonstrations expressing dissent have to be in designated places alone. The present case was not even one of protests taking place in an undesignated area, but was a blockage of a public way which caused grave inconvenience to commuters. We cannot accept the plea of the applicants that an indeterminable number of people can assemble whenever they choose to protest.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
In a 2:1 verdict, SC transfers custody of an 11-year-old to father living in Kenya; Justice Gupta, dissenting, says pampering is not parenting<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
While Indu Malhotra, J, for herself and UU Lalit, J, held that the child\u2019s preferences are not given due regard to, it could have an adverse psychological impact on him, Justice Gupta disagreed & said that the child should stay with the mother who has quit her job to be with him 24×7 & not with the father and his parents who were inclined towards pampering the child. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
SC stresses on importance of mirror orders in interjurisdictional child custody matters<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
Mirror orders are passed to safeguard the interest of the child who is in transit from one jurisdiction to another.\u00a0 Click here<\/a> to read what a mirror order is.<\/p>\n
All petitions challenging the IBC provisions relating to personal guarantors transferred to Supreme Court<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is at a nascent stage and it is better that the interpretation of the provisions of the Code is taken up by the Supreme Court to avoid any confusion. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
COVID-19| SC says \u201csystem of Video Conferencing has been extremely successful\u201d; alters only one guideline from April 6 order<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cWe must say the system of Video Conferencing has been extremely successful in providing access to justice.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Unless extended for \u201cgood reason\u201d, stay by \u2018any court\u2019 automatically expires within a period of six months<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cWhatever stay has been granted by any court including the High Court automatically expires within a period of six months, and unless extension is granted for good reason, within the next six months, the trial Court is, on the expiry of the first period of six months, to set a date for the trial and go ahead with the same.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Right to default bail under the first proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC not a mere statutory right but a fundamental right<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
The right to default bail is not a mere statutory right under the first proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC, but is part of the procedure established by law under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which is, therefore,\u00a0a fundamental right granted to an accused person to be released on bail once the conditions of the first proviso to Section 167(2) are fulfilled<\/em>. <\/strong>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
SC holds NRI quota for admission to professional courses \u201cneither sacrosanct, not inviolable\u201d; private colleges have some elbow room<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
In order to do justice to all the parties, the Court directed that a special counselling session should be carried out by the board, confined or restricted to the seats in respect of which admissions were made pursuant to the single judge\u2019s directions. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Payal Tadvi suicide| SC says accused doctors, as \u201cpresumably innocent persons\u201d, entitled to study; allows all 3 to resume studies in the same college<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cWhile balancing the competing claims, in our view, the Appellants must be allowed to go back to their courses of study otherwise the pendency of prosecution against them will add further penalty in the form of prejudicing their career. Any such adverse impact will negate their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
COVID-19|Booked air tickets during lockdown? Supreme Court orders full refund<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cWe cannot lose sight of the present situation prevailing in the country and across the globe\u201d Read directions<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
COVID-19| \u201cFinancial losses cannot be offset on the weary shoulders of the laboring worker\u201d; SC quashes Gujarat Notification permitting factories to extend work hours & cut overtime<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u201cTo a worker who has faced the brunt of the pandemic and is currently laboring in a workplace without the luxury of physical distancing, economic dignity based on the rights available under the statute is the least that this Court can ensure them.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
\nMORE STORIES<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n23 years after his wife\u2019s death, a man walks free as SC sets aside his conviction for abetting her suicide based on \u2018speculations\u2019 and \u2018inferences\u2019<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cThe conviction of Appellant by the Trial Court as well as the High Court on the theory that the woman with two young kids might have committed suicide, possibly because of the harassment faced by her in the matrimonial house, is not at all borne out by the evidence in the case.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Is SLP against an order rejecting the review petition maintainable when main judgment is not under challenge? SC answers<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
The 3-judge bench Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah has reiterated that when the main judgment of the High Court has not been challenged, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the main judgment of the High Court. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Law Student Sexual Assault case| SC sets aside All HC order; says copy of the statement of victim could not have been provided to Swamy Chinmayanand<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cThe right to receive a copy of such statement will arise only after cognizance is taken and at the stage contemplated by Sections 207 and 208 of the Code and not before.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Courts cannot adopt a rigid or formalistic approach while interpreting Section 167(2) CrPC<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cThe history of the enactment of Section 167(2), CrPC and the safeguard of \u2018default bail\u2019 contained in the Proviso thereto is intrinsically linked to Article 21 and is nothing but a legislative exposition of the constitutional safeguard that no person shall be detained except in accordance with rule of law.\u201d <\/strong>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
An offence committed by a \u2018juvenile\u2019 in 1981; three Juvenile Justice statutes and a legal conundrum on their applicability. Read how SC solved this riddle<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
The bench of SA Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ elaborately discussed the schemes of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, the Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection Of Children) Act, 2000 and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and concluded that<\/p>\n
\n
- \n
\n
- all proceedings in respect of a juvenile pending in any court on the date on which the 2000 Act came into force shall continue before that court as if the 2000 Act had not been passed; and<\/li>\n
- 2000 Act would continue to apply and govern the proceedings which were pending when the 2015 Act was enforced. Read more<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
SC issues notice in plea seeking regulation of social media profile verification; minors\u2019 access and circulation of obscene material<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
The plea filed by two law students from Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University)\u2019s New Law College, Pune, seeks directions for formulation of laws to control the circulation of illicit content including sale of obscene and pornographic material inclusive of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), rape videos and revenge porn on social media platforms. It also seeks formulation of laws to regulate social media access of minors and setting up of an efficient profile verification mechanism. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Police constable acquitted in a murder case but dismissed from service after a related disciplinary enquiry. Read why SC upheld the dismissal<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201c \u2026the yardstick and standard of proof in a criminal case is different from the disciplinary proceeding. While the standard of proof in a criminal case is a proof beyond all reasonable doubt, the proof in a departmental proceeding is preponderance of probabilities.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Does the custody of a child gets transferred from the mother to grand parents if they are assisting in looking after the child? Read what SC says<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
In a case dealing with the custody of a 7-year-old, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, JJ has said that\u00a0mere fact that a mother is looking after the child with the assistance of her parents, does not detract from her role and responsibility as a mother<\/em><\/strong>. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
\u201cAll our counseling to Government and Government authorities have fallen on deaf ears\u201d; SC on inordinate delay in filing appeals\/petitions by Govt.\/State Authorities<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201c\u2026 if the Government machinery is so inefficient and incapable of filing appeals\/petitions in time, the solution may lie in requesting the Legislature to expand the time period for filing limitation for Government authorities because of their gross incompetence. That is not so. Till the Statute subsists, the appeals\/petitions have to be filed as per the Statues prescribed.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\u201cWhat greater certificate of incompetence would there be for the legal Department!\u201d; SC on State of MP \u201cagain and again\u201d filing appeals after inordinate delay<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201c… it appears that all our counseling to Government and Government authorities have fallen on deaf ears i.e., the Supreme Court of India cannot be a place for the\u00a0 Governments to walk in when they choose ignoring the period of limitation prescribed.\u201d Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Is right to pre-emption a recurring right or exercisable only the first time? SC answers<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h4>\n
Such a right is available once \u2013 whether to take it or leave it to a person having a right of pre-emption. If such person finds it is not worth once, it is not an open right available for all times to come to that person. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Candidate declared unfit for the post of District Judge due to pendency of criminal case. Can they claim reconsideration after acquittal? Read what SC says<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
Mere fact that subsequently after more than a year when the person whose candidature has been cancelled has been acquitted cannot be a ground for reconsideration of his application by the High Court. <\/strong>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Can the breach of audi alteram partem rule by itself lead to the conclusion that prejudice has been caused? SC elucidates<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
Natural justice is a flexible tool in the hands of the judiciary to reach out in fit cases to remedy injustice. The breach of the\u00a0audi alteram partem<\/em>\u00a0rule cannot by itself, without more, lead to the conclusion that prejudice is thereby caused. Read more<\/a><\/p>\n
Evidence has to be weighed and not counted<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n\u201cThere is no legal impediment in convicting a person on the sole testimony of a single witness. That is the logic of Section 134 of the Evidence Act, 1872. But if there are doubts about the testimony, Courts will insist on corroboration. It is not the number, the quantity but quality that is material.” Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nIN OTHER NEWS<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n\u201cJustice Ramana\u2019s proximity with Mr. Chandrababu Naidu is too well-known\u201d; Read what Andhra Pradesh CM Jagan Mohan Reddy wrote in his letter to CJI<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
TOP STORIES Domestic Violence| Wife can claim right to residence in shared household belonging to not just husband but also to his <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":218562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,34119],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-scmonthly"],"yoast_head":"\n
Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"TOP STORIES Domestic Violence| Wife can claim right to residence in shared household belonging to not just husband but also to his\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-01T14:11:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-01T19:34:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-01T14:11:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-01T19:34:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020","og_description":"TOP STORIES Domestic Violence| Wife can claim right to residence in shared household belonging to not just husband but also to his","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-01T14:11:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-01T19:34:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/","name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-01T14:11:05+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-01T19:34:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2020\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2020"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":263438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/issue-of-accommodation-in-a-domestic-violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":0},"title":"Issue of accommodation in a Domestic Violence dispute between husband and wife shall not affect landlord’s right to get possession of his property: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing to interfere with the Delhi High Court verdict, the bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that in a dispute between the husband and wife under the Domestic Violence Act, the landlord, who otherwise is entitled to the decree of eviction should not be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/law-on-domestic-violence-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":1},"title":"Law on Domestic Violence [Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005]","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Shubhodip Chakraborty, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267077,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/aggrieved-woman-needs-economic-support-in-view-of-domestic-violence-maintenance-district-court-legalnews-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":2},"title":"Aggrieved woman needs economic support, in view of domestic violence, perpetrated upon her, by a person, who is in domestic relation with her: Karkardooma Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karkardooma Courts, Delhi: In a matter regarding providing maintenance to wife and children, Ramesh Kumar-1, Principal District & Sessions Judge, expressed that certain, factors such as husband\u2019s liabilities, his standard of living, inflation rates, etc. are to be taken note of when Court decides the quantum of maintenance. An appeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Karkardooma.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Karkardooma.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Karkardooma.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Karkardooma.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Karkardooma.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":150224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/17\/domestic-violence-under-s-3-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-takes-into-its-fold-economic-abuse-also\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":3},"title":"Domestic violence under S. 3 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, takes into its fold economic abuse also","author":"Saba","date":"August 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a criminal revision petition, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Rathnakala, J. held that the obligation of the husband to maintain the wife continues throughout the matrimonial life and the husband cannot get away with an excuse that for many years no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/05\/domestic-abuse\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":4},"title":"Tri HC | How are \u2018economic abuse\u2019 and \u2018domestic abuse\u2019 synonymous? HC explains in light of S. 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., elaborated on the aspect of economic abuse in term of Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Factual Matrix Wife had presented an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, wherein she\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/16\/domestic-violence-sc-wife-can-claim-right-to-residence-in-shared-household-belonging-to-not-just-husband-but-also-to-his-relatives-read-conditions\/","url_meta":{"origin":238336,"position":5},"title":"[Domestic Violence] SC| Wife can claim right to residence in shared household belonging to not just husband but also to his relatives. Read conditions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe progress of any society depends on its ability to protect and promote the rights of its women.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238336\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/218562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}