{"id":238286,"date":"2020-10-30T18:00:15","date_gmt":"2020-10-30T12:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238286"},"modified":"2020-11-06T11:56:40","modified_gmt":"2020-11-06T06:26:40","slug":"hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Ajay Mohan Goel J., while rejecting the present criminal revision sought against the compensation and maintenance allowed by the lower court, clarified the legal position on simultaneous remedy under the Domestic Violence Act and the Criminal Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Brief Facts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case are enumerated herewith;<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>That a petition filed by the respondent herein, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, stood allowed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, titled as <em>Palbi Sharma v. Sachin Sharma<\/em>, vide order dated 23-12-2016, directing the present petitioner to pay monthly maintenance to the tune of Rs 3000 per month to the present respondent\/wife from the date of the order.<\/li>\n<li>That, in addition Rs 20000 was also ordered by way of compensation by the Court against the proven acts of cruelty committed by the present petitioner.<\/li>\n<li>That the petitioner was also directed to provide accommodation to the wife, on rent comprising of one room, kitchen bathroom and toilet or in the alternative to provide said accommodation in his own house if he was in a position to do so.<\/li>\n<li>That the petitioner filed an appeal against the abovementioned decision which was dismissed by the Court of Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 29-09-2018.<\/li>\n<li>That the wife also filed an appeal against the order passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, which was also dismissed by the Appellate Court vide the same order.<\/li>\n<li>That the wife has not preferred any further petition against the adjudication made in her appeal by the Appellate Court, therefore, this Court is not making any observation qua rejection of the said appeal but, feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, the present Court herein addresses this case as filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the present criminal revision filed by the petitioner maintainable?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While rejecting the present criminal revision, the Court concurred with the findings of the lower court and said that both, the amount granted under Section 125 CrPC, amounting Rs 3500 and an amount of Rs 3000, ordered under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, in addition to the compensation of Rs 20000, awarded against the proven charges of cruelty, stand justified and <em>\u201cby no stretch of imagination, can be said to be on the higher side\u201d. <\/em>The Court further clarified that, <em>\u201cThe provisions of Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are distinct and different. Law does not prohibit the wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise.\u201d<\/em>[Sachin Sharma v. Palvi Sharma,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sIydZTRa\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 2109<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26-10-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while rejecting the present criminal revision sought against the compensation and maintenance allowed by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,2549,12531],"class_list":["post-238286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-maintenance","tag-section-125-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while rejecting the present criminal revision sought against the compensation and maintenance allowed by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-30T12:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-06T06:26:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-30T12:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-06T06:26:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while rejecting the present criminal revision sought against the compensation and maintenance allowed by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-30T12:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-06T06:26:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","name":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-30T12:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-06T06:26:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/kar-hc-is-petition-under-s-125-crpc-maintainable-when-an-order-of-compensation-has-been-granted-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Is petition under S. 125 CrPC maintainable when an order of compensation has been granted under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Jyoti Mulmani J., allowed the revision petition on grounds of failure to ascertain and understand the material propositions involved in the case. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a legally wedded wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 28-02-2007 at Gayathri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":165054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/25\/maintenance-domestic-violence-act-paid-addition-not-substitution-maintenance-awarded-s-125-cr-pc\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":1},"title":"Maintenance under Domestic Violence Act to be paid in addition to and not in substitution of maintenance awarded under S. 125 Cr PC","author":"Saba","date":"October 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. heard a case involving counter-petitions filed by both the parties to the matrimonial proceedings. The issue before the Court was \u201cwhether the order of maintenance passed in the proceedings filed under Section 125 of CrPC is to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act&#8221;: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/18\/dealing-matters-maintenance-domestic-violence-act-magistrates-should-specify-maintenance-ordered-under-crpc-or-hama-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":3},"title":"Magistrates should specify whether maintenance is ordered under CrPC or HAMA while dealing with Domestic Violence matters: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFor the reason that the parties are Hindus, one cannot assume that the order of maintenance is in recognition of the right under HAMA, for, Section 125 CrPC is secular and applicable to all.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/02\/domestic-violence-act-6\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":4},"title":"Whether the maintenance awarded under the Domestic Violence Act can be sought to be enhanced under the CrPC? Kar HC analyses","author":"Editor","date":"March 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M. Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the criminal petition and quashed both the orders by the Magistrate and the Sessions Judge. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner and the respondent are husband and Wife and the marital life between the couple have turned sore, pursuant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/delhi-hc-focus-of-domestic-violence-act-to-provide-immediate-relief-to-victims-by-way-of-maintenance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":238286,"position":5},"title":"Domestic Violence Act focuses on providing immediate relief to victims through maintenance, not Imprisonment for non-payment of maintenance: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Domestic Violence Act was enacted to offer certain civil remedies to the victims of domestic violence. These remedies encompass an array of protective measures, residence orders, and monetary reliefs, designed to address the multifaceted nature of abuse.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238286\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}