{"id":238262,"date":"2020-10-30T15:00:05","date_gmt":"2020-10-30T09:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238262"},"modified":"2020-11-06T11:53:39","modified_gmt":"2020-11-06T06:23:39","slug":"j-petition-allowed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: <\/strong>Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, <em>\u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on the detenue is a very precious constitutional right and the object behind the same is to enable the detenue to file an effective representation. It will be an empty formality to supply the grounds of detention to the detenue unless he is in a position to understand the same.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Brief Facts<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present petition is moved against the order dated 17-07-2020, issued by District Magistrate, Samba (\u201cDetaining Authority\u201d) whereby Chain Singh son of Late Shri Rawail Singh, resident of Village Birpur, District Samba (\u201cdetenu\u201d) has been placed under preventive detention and lodged in Sub Jail, Hiranagar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Contentions<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner has contended that the Detaining Authority has passed the impugned detention order mechanically without application of mind, inasmuch as the grounds of detention are mere reproduction of the dossier. It has been further contended that the Constitutional and Statutory procedural safeguards have not been complied with and that the allegations made against the detenue in the grounds of detention are vague. Furthermore, it has been pleaded that the translated version of the documents\/grounds of detention has not been provided to the detenue who is a semi-literate person and neither has the petitioner been informed of the rightful authority against which he can move his representation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondents, in their counter affidavit, have disputed the averments made in the petition and stated that they have followed the provisions of J&amp;K Public Safety Act. It is contended that the detenue has been detained only after following due procedure that the grounds of detention were read over to the detenue. Moreover, there has been proper application of mind for detaining and that the detenue has been provided with all the requisite material related to the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Issue<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the detention order made by the authority complying with all due procedure and Constitutional safeguards?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Observation<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rejecting the argument of the respondent counsel, the Court held, \u201c<em>In the instant case it is clear from the detention record that the petitioner has not been furnished the translated version of the grounds of detention nor has he been provided the material on the basis of which grounds of detention have been formulated. Further, the executing officer has not filed an affidavit to show that he has fully explained the grounds of detention to the detenue in the language he understands.\u201d <\/em>The Court went on to say, <em>\u201cThus, vital safeguards against arbitrary use of law of preventive detention have been observed in breach by the respondents in this case rendering the impugned order of detention unsustainable in law.\u201d \u00a0<\/em>With respect to the contention, that the order is a mere reproduction of the dossier lacking any application of mind, the Court placed reliance on the case of <em>Jai Singh v. State of J&amp;K,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g78fc33i\">(1985) 1 SCC 561<\/a>; wherein the Court examined the order and the dossier, concluding that the format, usage of words and the manner of expression in both the said documents remain essentially the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While allowing the present petition, the Court quashed the impugned order dated 17-07-2020 and further directed the authorities concerned to release the detenue from the preventive custody.[Chain Singh v. Union Territory of J&amp;K,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RA3v9qwJ\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 539<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-10-2020]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Counsel for the Petitioner: <\/strong>S. M. Chowdhary, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Counsel for the Respondent:<\/strong> Aijaz Lone, Dy. AG.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, \u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33966,32251,29785,43929],"class_list":["post-238262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-detenue","tag-jk-public-safety-act","tag-law","tag-prevntive-custody"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, \u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-30T09:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-06T06:23:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-30T09:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-06T06:23:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, \u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-30T09:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-06T06:23:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","name":"J&K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-30T09:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-06T06:23:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":0},"title":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The detenue specifically alleged that he made a representation against impugned detention order, however, the same was not considered by the detaining authority.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/failure-on-part-of-detaining-authority-to-supply-material-renders-detention-order-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":1},"title":"Failure on part of detaining authority to supply material renders detention order illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the district judge of preventive custody. The detenue was arrested from his home for the commission of offences punishable under Section 121-A RPC, 7\/25 Arms Act and 13\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":2},"title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn other words, a detenue may be able to make an effective representation if the details of the facts, on the basis of which conclusion is drawn by the detaining authority, are furnished to him\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/jk-hc-quashes-detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":3},"title":"Know why J&amp;K and Ladakh HC quashed preventive detention order executed after 45-days delay","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf a detenue satisfied the Court that there was an unexplained delay in execution of the detention order, then such an order would be interpreted as breaking the live-proximity link in between the event of detention and passing of the detention order.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Detention order executed after 45-days delay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jk-hc-order-of-detention-under-j-k-public-safety-act-cannot-ordinarily-be-passed-merely-on-ground-that-an-accused-under-trial-was-out-on-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":4},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention under J&#038;K Public Safety Act cannot ordinarily be passed, merely on ground that an accused under trial was out on bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. allowed the application filed by the petitioner to free him from detention. The petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition against the order of detention, passed by the Respondent 2 who is the District Magistrate Baramulla, in exercise of powers conferred in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/jk-and-ladakh-hc-number-of-acts-not-to-be-determined-for-detention-of-an-individual-but-impact-of-the-acts-preventive-detention\/","url_meta":{"origin":238262,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC| Number of acts not to be determined for detention of an individual, but impact of the act(s) [Preventive Detention]","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, J. dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the detention order in terms of Section (3) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (\u2018NDPS Act\u2019) issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir (\u2018Detaining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}