{"id":238132,"date":"2020-10-28T17:00:34","date_gmt":"2020-10-28T11:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238132"},"modified":"2020-11-06T12:10:46","modified_gmt":"2020-11-06T06:40:46","slug":"bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Vibha Kankanwadi, J., observed that,<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" style=\"text-align: justify;\" title=\"Page 14\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8220;The practice of pronouncing Judgments in appeal against conviction in absence of the accused, thereby dismissing the appeal and then directing the trial Court to issue warrant, requires to be deprecated.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant application was filed by the original accused for suspension of substantive sentence, during the pendency of revision imposed against him by Judicial Magistrate after holding him guilty of committing an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that at first it is required to be seen, as to whether before admitting the revision and while dealing with the present application whether it is necessary first to direct the applicant to surrender himself.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It appears that the Appellate Court in the present case pronounced the Judgment on 04-05-2019 in absence of the appellant-accused.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Section 387 of CrPC deals with Judgment of subordinate Appellate Court and it provides that the rule contained in Chapter XXVII as to the judgment of a Criminal Court of original jurisdiction shall apply, so far as may be practicable, to the judgment in appeal of a Court of Session or Chief Judicial Magistrate.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8220;&#8230;if directions\/ order is passed by the Appellate Court for exemption of the accused, then only the Judgment can be pronounced in absence of the accused; otherwise his presence should be secured before the Judgment is pronounced.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 10\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 11\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>No doubt, sub section (7) of Section 353 of the Code provides, that no judgment delivered by any Criminal Court shall be deemed to be invalid by the reason only in absence of any party, however, the Appellate Court cannot insist upon invoking sub section (7) of Section 353 of the Code if there was no endeavour on its part to secure the presence of the accused.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court stated that it is the Appellate Court&#8217;s duty to see that the Judgment in an appeal against conviction should be pronounced in presence of the accused <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">(only exception as enumerated in Section 353 (6) of the Code) and to take such appellant in custody upon the confirmation of the conviction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Coming to the question of whether in the present case, Court could direct the revision applicant to surrender himself before the Appellate Court and then take up revision for hearing, Bench stated that the answer for the said question was in the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision of\u00a0<em>Bihari Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/rQvtVLlG\">(2000) 10 SCC 346<\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the above-cited case, the following question was considered:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; color: #000000;\">Whether the High Court while exercising its jurisdiction can refuse to hear or entertain the matter on the ground that the accused has not surrendered?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Following was observed:<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 14\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cUnder the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, there is no such requirement though many High Courts in this country have made such provision in the respective rules of the High Court. But it is stated to us that there is no such rule in the Patna High Court Rules. In that view of <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">the matter the High Court was not justified in rejecting the application for revision solely on the ground that the accused has not surrendered.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above discussion, Court held that the revision application cannot be rejected on the ground that the accused did not surrender and therefore, there was no bar on considering the present application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">What was the basic crux and background of the matter?<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 15\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The complainant stated he had extended loan amount, from time to time, and the disputed cheque was given by the accused in the discharge of said legal debt or liability. Accused took a defence that he had already given certain cheques in possession of the complainant and one of the said cheques was misused. He led evidence and in his defence he tried to show, that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act had been rebutted by him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court found the above to be an arguable case and hence held that the revision deserves to be admitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench directed for the suspension of the substantive part of the sentence till the revision was decided.[Fazal Khalil Ahemad Shaikh v. Nadkishor Ramnivasji Agrawal, Criminal Application No. 2743 of 2019, decided on 13-02-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0Vibha Kankanwadi, J., observed that, &#8220;The practice of pronouncing Judgments in appeal against conviction in absence of the accused, thereby <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3700,20521,12981,2554,29785,33580],"class_list":["post-238132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-accused","tag-appellate-court","tag-judgment","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-law","tag-section-139-ni-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Vibha Kankanwadi, J., observed that, &#8220;The practice of pronouncing Judgments in appeal against conviction in absence of the accused, thereby\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-28T11:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-06T06:40:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-28T11:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-06T06:40:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Vibha Kankanwadi, J., observed that, &#8220;The practice of pronouncing Judgments in appeal against conviction in absence of the accused, thereby","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-28T11:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-06T06:40:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/","name":"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-28T11:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-06T06:40:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/bom-hc-in-absence-of-an-accused-can-appellate-court-pronounce-judgment-in-an-appeal-against-conviction-hc-considers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | In absence of an accused, can Appellate Court pronounce Judgment in an appeal against conviction? HC considers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/31\/ker-hc-hc-upholds-concurrent-findings-of-conviction-and-sentence-of-trial-court-and-appellate-court-sought-to-be-set-aside-in-revision-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | HC upholds concurrent findings of conviction and sentence of\u00a0Trial Court and Appellate Court sought to be set aside in revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N.Anil Kumar, J., allowed the instant revision petition against the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court. The facts of the case are such that, on 24-10-1998 the accused was found in possession of 2.5 litres of illicit arrack in contravention of the Kerala\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for simple imprisonment for six months for offences punishable under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but it did not pass\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/madras-hc-presumption-under-s-139-ni-act-not-available-in-case-of-principal-agent-relationship-between-accused-and-complainant\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC | Presumption under S. 139 NI Act not available in case of principal-agent relationship between accused and complainant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0G. Jayachandran, J., dismissed an appeal directed against the judgment of the first Appellate Court whereby it had reversed the conviction and sentence of the respondent-accused awarded by the trial court for an offence\u00a0punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonour of cheque). As per\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220858,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/del-hc-suggestion-given-by-counsel-on-behalf-of-accused-cannot-be-considered-as-admission-to-bind-him-under-s-18-of-evidence-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Suggestion given by counsel on behalf of accused cannot be considered as &#8220;admission&#8221; to bind him under S. 18 of Evidence Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. allowed a revision petition filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the petitioner was convicted for offence punishable under Section 354-A IPC\u00a0(sexual harassment). On the day of the incident, the petitioner was acting as an invigilator inside the examination hall where the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/25\/cal-hc-making-statement-of-accused-under-s-108-of-customs-act-the-foundation-of-offence-under-wild-life-protection-act-is-against-principles-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":4},"title":"Cal HC | Making statement of accused under S. 108 of Customs Act the foundation of offence under Wild Life (Protection) Act is against principles of law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Tirthankar Ghosh, J., reversed the order of the trial court (as confirmed by the first appellate court) whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for committing an offence under Section 40(2) read with Section 51(1-A) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The petitioner was accused of unlawfully\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/07\/ker-hc-court-sets-aside-sentence-of-conviction-and-demands-payment-of-fine-in-matter-of-dishonour-of-cheque-under-s-138-of-negotiable-instruments-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":238132,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Court sets aside sentence of conviction and demands payment of fine in matter of dishonour of cheque under S. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R. Narayana Pisharadi J., allowed a criminal revision petition in part in a matter relating to Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. In the present case, the accused had obtained an amount of Rs 5, 00,000 from the complainant on the promise that he would arrange\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238132"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238132\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}