{"id":237802,"date":"2020-10-21T11:30:25","date_gmt":"2020-10-21T06:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237802"},"modified":"2020-10-23T11:34:00","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T06:04:00","slug":"pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court<\/strong>: In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ of certiorari, Birendra Kumar, J., dismissed the same finding no reason warranting interference.<\/p>\n

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner who pleads for the quashing of the order contained in Memo No. 3751 dated 10-10-2018 passed by the respondent 3, the Secretary of Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board in which the petitioner was put under suspicion and departmental proceedings were initiated against him.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that in a writ petition CWJC No. 10951 of 2015, this Court by order dated 27-06-2016 had directed CBI investigation in the matter of appointment of 73 Gramin Dak Sevaks during the period 2008-13 in Muzaffarpur Postal Division on the basis of fake and forged Madhyama Marksheet. R.C.\u2019s were registered and during investigation, it came to light that one of the schools namely, Krishnadev Niranjan Dr Jai Narayan Sharma Sanskrit High School, Patahi, Muzaffarpur in a conspiracy, accepted forms of Madhyama examination for the period 2005-09 from the students and their fee was also collected an unauthorized manner. Subsequently, R.C. 1A of 2017 was registered on 18-01-2017. The S.P., C.B.I. vide his letter dated 04-04-2018 addressed to the Chairman of Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (respondent 4) reported that during investigation, sufficient material came on the record to initiate a departmental proceeding for major punishment against three persons including the petitioner who were Assistants in Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board as they had allowed backdoor entry of students.<\/p>\n

The primary ground for challenging the impugned order is that Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 is not applicable on the employees of the Sanskrit Shiksha Board nor there is any other Rule governing the service condition.<\/p>\n

Other ground is that the disciplinary action has been taken by the competent authority solely based on the recommendation of the C.B.I. without any application of its own mind.<\/p>\n

The petitioner has admitted that the Board has adopted the State Government\u2019s Rules with respect to payment of gratuity, leave encashment and other benefits.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that it\u2019s not possible for an institution to run without any service rules. It is evident from the impugned order that Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 and Amendment Rules 2007 are applicable and under those Rules, action has been taken. Moreover, based on petitioner\u2019s admittance, immunity cannot be claimed from the disciplinary proceeding rule.<\/p>\n

For the second ground of non-application of mind by the competent authority, the Court thoroughly perused the impugned order and observed that it can\u2019t be made out from the order that action has only been taken on the recommendation of the C.B.I. rather the competent authority has applied its mind while accepting the allegations which were brought on record during the investigation of the case by the C.B.I. for initiating the departmental proceeding.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner, Bam Bahadur Jha has relied on the case of Bipin Bihari Singh v. State of Bihar<\/em>, 2014 SCC OnLine Pat 5306<\/a>. The Court questioned its relevance and applicability and found it unconvincing.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the petition has been dismissed by the court finding absolutely no reason to interfere in the impugned order.[Raja Jha v. State of Bihar, 2020 SCC OnLine Pat 1661<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-10-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Yashvardhan Shrivastav, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ of certiorari, Birendra Kumar, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14371,3042,2554,35403],"class_list":["post-237802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-disciplinary-proceedings","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-writ-of-certiorari"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ of certiorari, Birendra Kumar,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-21T06:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-23T06:04:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-21T06:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-23T06:04:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees","og_description":"Patna High Court: In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ of certiorari, Birendra Kumar,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-21T06:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-23T06:04:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","name":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-21T06:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-23T06:04:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/ori-hc-no-ambit-of-writ-of-certiorari-under-article-226-when-there-is-neither-procedural-irregularity-in-conducting-inquiry-nor-violation-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | No ambit of writ of certiorari under Article 226 when there is neither procedural irregularity in conducting inquiry nor violation of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed the writ petition against the judgment declining interference in the disciplinary proceeding and order imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement. The facts of the case were that appellant-petitioner was appointed as an officer of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/utt-hc-court-rejects-plea-of-bias-against-the-enquiry-officer-dismisses-petition-in-the-matter-of-departmental-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Court rejects Plea of bias against the Enquiry officer; Dismisses petition in the matter of departmental proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., dismissed a writ petition which was filed in the nature of certiorari and mandamus for quashing of certain orders passed by the enquiry officer and with a prayer to change the enquiry officer on grounds of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/14\/utt-hc-judgment-of-a-competent-court-is-binding-inter-parties-and-cannot-be-re-agitated-in-collateral-proceedings-even-if-erroneous\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Judgment of a Competent Court is binding inter-parties and cannot be re-agitated in collateral proceedings even if erroneous","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan and R.C. Khulbe, JJ. contemplated a writ petition, where the petitioner who was an Assistant Professor, sought certiorari to quash the order of recovery of money along with interest. The petitioner further sought mandamus to direct the respondent-State University to re-examine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/manipur-high-court-natural-justice-disciplinary-proceedings-enquiry-officer-presiding-officer-central-reserve-police-force-departmental-enquiry-writ-petition-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":3},"title":"Absence from duty without leave under CRPF is a gravest misconduct; Manipur High Court upheld order of Disciplinary Authority of dismissal from service","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Manipur High Court: In a writ petition filed to quash the dismissal order dated 18.1.2005 on the ground that it has violated the principles of natural justice and during the departmental enquiry, the Enquiry Officer proceeded the disciplinary proceedings without the Presiding Officer, thus, not affording a reasonable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Manipur High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209205,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/02\/pat-hc-court-cannot-exercise-jurisdiction-in-a-matter-where-departmental-proceedings-are-pending-against-employee-and-no-final-order-has-been-given-therein\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Court cannot exercise jurisdiction in a matter where departmental proceedings are pending against employee and no final order has been given therein","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Madhuresh Prasad, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed by an employee against whom disciplinary proceedings were initiated but no final order had been given in the matter. The present writ application had been filed challenging the entire proceedings arising out of departmental proceedings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":237802,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied on settled precedents upon power of judicial review against an Award passed by Tribunal or Lower Court. \u00a0Background Respondent had raised a demand for regularization in service but\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237802"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}