{"id":237755,"date":"2020-10-20T18:30:30","date_gmt":"2020-10-20T13:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237755"},"modified":"2020-10-20T17:24:43","modified_gmt":"2020-10-20T11:54:43","slug":"kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and further rejected the argument of the petitioner that the lower courts have erred in appreciating the evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Brief Facts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 CrPC, read with Section 401 CrPC, praying to set aside the judgment\/order of conviction dated 27-01-2018 passed in Criminal Case No. 52506 of 2013 and the judgment dated 12-08-2020 passed in Criminal application No. 2507 of 2018. Challenging the concurrent judgments and sentence for payment of Rs 10,00,000 rendered by the Courts below convicting the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner prays for acquittal on the ground that the lower Courts have erred in appreciating the evidences placed on record in addition with according to the adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner\/accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the present petition under Section 397 CrPC maintainable?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Observation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while redefining the scope and ambit of Section 397 noted,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u201cThis Court in exercise of its power under Section 397CrPC cannot re-appreciate the evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if different view is possible from the evidence. The jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC could be exercised only when the decision under challenge is grossly erroneous; non-compliance with the provisions of law; finding of fact affecting the decision is not based on evidence; non-consideration of the material evidence and that the lower court has exercised the discretion arbitrarily or perversely and acted in excess of its jurisdiction or abused its power resulting in failure of justice.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further said that no errors or illegality can be traced in the orders made by the lower court in the instant case. The argument made on the ground of inadequate hearing stands rejected as the records prove procedural compliance and stage of evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rejecting the present criminal revision petition at the admission stage itself, the Court found no reasons to interfere with the findings of the trial court, on both sentence and conviction.[K. Kuppuraj v. J. Thrilokamurthy,\u00a0 Crl. Revision petition No. 606 of 2020, decided on 05-10-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29620,29785,34246,33639,43835],"class_list":["post-237755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-revision-petition","tag-law","tag-opportunity-of-hearing","tag-section-397-crpc","tag-section-401-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-20T13:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-20T13:00:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-20T13:00:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","name":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-20T13:00:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":209629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of Additional Sessions Judge. Genesis of the grievance was noted in a complaint filed by\u00a0petitioner alleging that respondent\u00a0stole the cheque in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-remedy-under-s-125-crpc-and-s-12-of-dv-act-2005-are-distinct-and-different-law-does-not-prohibit-wife-to-proceed-under-both-of-the-said-statutory-provisions-simultaneously-or-otherwise-pe\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Remedy under S. 125 CrPC and S. 12 of DV Act, 2005 are distinct and different; Law does not prohibit wife to proceed under both of the said statutory provisions simultaneously or otherwise; Petition dismissed  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while rejecting the present criminal revision sought against the compensation and maintenance allowed by the lower court, clarified the legal position on simultaneous remedy under the Domestic Violence Act and the Criminal Procedure Code. \u00a0Brief Facts Facts of the case are enumerated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/03\/del-hc-what-is-the-scope-of-power-of-revision-of-hc-under-crpc-court-discusses-while-denying-interference-in-matrimonial-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | What is the scope of power of revision of HC under CrPC? Court discusses while denying interference in matrimonial matter","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., while addressing the present revision petition expressed that: \u201cA court in revision considers the material only to satisfy itself about the legality and propriety of the findings, sentence and order and refrains from substituting its own conclusion on an elaborate consideration of the evidence.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/cal-hc-affirms-rejection-of-section-311-crpc-application-due-to-bar-on-criminal-revision-under-section-3972-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of Section 311 CrPC application due to bar on criminal revision under Section 397(2) CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court observed that Section 311 of the CrPC provides wide discretionary powers to courts for summoning, examining, or recalling witnesses if their evidence is essential to a just decision.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262020,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/18\/money-laundering-offence-under-pmla\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":4},"title":"Money laundering offence under PMLA is, layered and multi-fold and includes stages preceding and succeeding offence of laundering money: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While expressing the object of PMLA Act Chandra Dhari Singh, J., expressed that, offence of money laundering is threefold including the stages of placement, whereby the criminals place the proceeds of crime to the general and genuine financial system, layering, whereby such proceeds of crime are spread\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/16\/chhattisgarh-hc-appeal-against-order-of-acquittal-u-s-138-of-ni-act-lies-to-high-court-u-s-3784-of-crpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":237755,"position":5},"title":"Appeal against order of acquittal u\/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 lies to High Court u\/s 378(4) of CrPC: Chhattisgarh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate that some person, has committed an offence, will fall within the meaning of \u2018complaint\u2019. Pertinently, the definition specifically excludes a police report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}