{"id":237484,"date":"2020-10-15T14:40:36","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T09:10:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237484"},"modified":"2020-10-16T11:22:28","modified_gmt":"2020-10-16T05:52:28","slug":"ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court<\/strong>: While deciding an application for transfer of two cases from one jurisdiction to another, R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., disposed of the same finding no reason to pass an order to that effect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The factual matrix in the present case is that the respondent has filed O.P. No. 460 of 2019 against the first petitioner in the family court, Muvattupuzha for restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent has filed another O.P. No. 662 of 2019 against the petitioners in the same court seeking guardianship and permanent custody of the two minor children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present application has been filed by the petitioners to transfer the above mentioned two cases from the family court, Muvattupuzha to the family court, Thrissur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The following grounds have been set forth by the petitioner for transfer of the cases: (1) The family court, Muvattupuzha has got no jurisdiction to entertain<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">and try the case O.P. No. 662 of 2019 and it should\u2019ve been filed before the Family Court, Thrissur. (2) The first petitioner has filed a case as M.C.No.639 of 2019 against the respondent under Section 125 CrPC in the family court, Thrissur claiming maintenance for the two minor children. Consolidation of the two cases pending in the family court, Muvattupuzha and the case M.C.No. 639 of 2019 pending in the family court, Thrissur is necessary. (3) The first petitioner and her parents are residing at Thrissur. The convenience of the wife and the children has to be given preference in matrimonial matters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With reference to the contention that family court, Muvattupuzha lacks jurisdiction, the Court observed that the said contention is irrelevant as it should have been raised before that family court itself. It requires consideration of disputed facts which can be done by the family court and not this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also observed that just because of the fact that first petitioner has instituted a case as M.C.No.639 of 2019 in the family court, Thrissur is also not a sufficient ground to transfer the other two cases pending in the family court, Muvattupuzha to the family court, Thrissur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While deliberating over the principle generally followed that in applications for transfer of cases relating to matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife has to be given preference; the Court observed that in the present matter preference has to be given to the convenience and welfare of the children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent, Biju Abraham has submitted that currently children are in the custody of the respondent and they are living with him and his parents at his house which is within the jurisdiction of the family court, Muvattupuzha. The petitioner has failed to provide any evidence which could show otherwise. The respondent is a practicing doctor while the first petitioner is pursuing her post-graduate studies. Transfer of the cases from the family court, Muvattupuzha to the family court, Thrissur would cause considerable hardship to the respondent and also to the children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also noted that the respondent had filed O.P.(FC) Nos. 309 of 2020 and 323 of 2020 before this Court for speedy disposal of the cases O.P. No. 460 of 2019 and O.P. No. 662 of 2019 pending before the family court, Muvattupuzha in which this Court allowed the prayer issuing a direction that family court, Muvattupuzha has to dispose of the aforesaid two cases within a period of six months. If the cases are transferred now, then the same would result in an unnecessary delay thus defeating the purpose of expeditious disposal in return.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the Court has dismissed the present application finding no merit in the arguments raised by the petitioner.[Nimi v. Ajith M.T., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DAn9KdqS\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Ker 4313<\/b><\/a>, decided on 09-10-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Yashvardhan Shrivastav, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: While deciding an application for transfer of two cases from one jurisdiction to another, R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., disposed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2554,36031,12531,29532,43793],"class_list":["post-237484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-matrimonial-matters","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-transfer-of-cases","tag-welfare-of-children"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: While deciding an application for transfer of two cases from one jurisdiction to another, R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., disposed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-15T09:10:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-16T05:52:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-15T09:10:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-16T05:52:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case","og_description":"Kerala High Court: While deciding an application for transfer of two cases from one jurisdiction to another, R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., disposed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-15T09:10:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-16T05:52:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","name":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-15T09:10:36+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-16T05:52:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":218371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/19\/ph-hc-wifes-convenience-must-be-seen-before-deciding-transfer-application-in-matrimonial-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Wife\u2019s convenience must be seen before deciding transfer application in matrimonial cases","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: H.S. Madaan, J. allowed the transfer application for the convenience of the wife in the divorce petition. An application for the transfer of divorce petition was made by the applicant on the ground of financial constraint. The brief facts of the case were that applicant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/08\/family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | If a proceeding is pending before Family Court, would this warrant the application under S. 12 Domestic Violence Act to be transferred to Family Court? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., while addressing a matrimonial matter, highlighted the scope of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, PWDV Act provides for a complete mechanism for enforcement of the rights claimed under Section 12 of PWDV Act and merely because the rights as provided under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217685,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/03\/mp-hc-convenience-of-wife-to-be-considered-in-case-of-transfer-of-matrimonial-cases-rule-to-be-used-diligently\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Convenience of wife to be considered in case of transfer of matrimonial cases; rule to be used diligently","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. refused to transfer the matrimonial dispute from Mandsaur to Gwalior. The applicant\/wife has filed the present petition under Section 24 of the CPC seeking transfer Matrimonial Case No.208\/2017 from Family Court, Mandsaur to Family Court, Gwalior. The petition was filed by the respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223845,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/ker-hc-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-the-accused-in-a-case-under-under-s-498-a-ipc-observing-the-matter-is-purely-matrimonial\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a case under under S. 498-A IPC, observing the matter is purely matrimonial","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J. allowed this application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicant of this bail is the accused in Crime No. 2227 of 2019 of the Sasthamkotta Police Station in Kollam District. The applicant was accused of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238503,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/pat-hc-partys-conduct-lacks-bonafide-and-was-only-with-the-view-for-the-court-to-interfere-and-grant-indulgence-court-has-been-misled-anticipatory-bail-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Party\u2019s conduct lacks bonafide and was only with the view for the court to interfere and grant indulgence, Court has been misled; anticipatory bail denied","author":"Editor","date":"November 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J., dismissed an application for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Dumraon PS Case No. 201 of 2019 dated 08-06-2019, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3\/4\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/20\/pat-hc-review-of-an-order-due-to-change-of-lawyer-liable-to-be-rejected-sets-a-bad-precedent\/","url_meta":{"origin":237484,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Review of an order due to change of lawyer liable to be rejected \u2013 sets a bad precedent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. dismissed a review application filed by the petitioner-husband for review of this Court\u2019s order in a matrimonial case (pertaining to restitution of conjugal rights) whereby a direction was given to transfer records of the said case from this Court to the Family Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237484"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237484\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}