{"id":237481,"date":"2020-10-15T16:40:04","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T11:10:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237481"},"modified":"2020-10-23T13:12:15","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T07:42:15","slug":"hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: Jyotsna Rewal Dua J., dismissed the appeal on ground of impugned judgment\/orders being devoid of any infirmity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts in a nutshell are that three ladies are claiming themselves to be the legally wedded wives of late Sh. Prem Chand and therefore entitled to his service benefits. Suit filed by one of them i.e. L1 and opposed by the other two L2 and L3, has been decreed by the learned Trial Court. This decree has been affirmed by the learned First Appellate Court. Aggrieved, the other two ladies are before this Court by way of second appeal based on important question of law that whether the Courts by way of impugned judgment misconstrued or misinterpreted the pleadings and evidence in finding out as to who is the legally wedded wife and children of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel Nimish Gupta and Vinod Thakur represented the appellants and Counsel Surinder Saklani, H.S. Rangra, Amit Dhumal, and. Manoj Bagga represented the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Submissions by L2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Neither was L2 able to show any proper documentary proof validating her claims of being legally wedded wife nor her children able to proof themselves as legal representatives of the deceased. She relied on entry of her name as the nominee in the service record of the deceased however no contemporary evidence was presented validating the same. The fact that no pandit was involved during her marriage with the deceased and that she couldn\u2019t attend funeral of the deceased vitiates her claims further.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Submissions by L3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">L3 also failed to show any proper documentary evidence validating her claim infact she even admitted that she made no objection or complaint regarding one other man working as a sweeper in HRTC Mandi whose details reflects L3 as his wife and her children as his own.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Submissions by L1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>L1 substantiated her claim by showing negatives of wedding pictures as well as pandit who performed the marriage rites , Jamabandi Record, Panchayat Record affidavits which clearly show that deceased and L1 applied for their wedding to be registered along with Legal Heirs Certificate validating the claim of her children as the legal representatives of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that a second appeal only lies on a substantial question of law. It is not open to re-agitate facts or to call upon the High Court to re-analyze or re-appreciate evidence in a second appeal. <strong>Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases, where a substantial question of law is involved<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that all the aspects in the instant second appeal and cross objection are purely factual. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal or cross-objections.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the appeal stands dismissed and disposed off.[Shanta Devi v. Kaushalya Devi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/861q85Cq\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 1828<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-10-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua J., dismissed the appeal on ground of impugned judgment\/orders being devoid of any infirmity. The <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30967,34349,25654],"class_list":["post-237481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-second-appeal","tag-section-100-cpc","tag-substantial-question-of-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua J., dismissed the appeal on ground of impugned judgment\/orders being devoid of any infirmity. The\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-15T11:10:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-23T07:42:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-15T11:10:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-23T07:42:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua J., dismissed the appeal on ground of impugned judgment\/orders being devoid of any infirmity. The","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-15T11:10:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-23T07:42:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/","name":"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-15T11:10:04+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-23T07:42:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/hp-hc-s-100-cpc-restricts-the-right-of-second-appeal-only-to-those-cases-where-a-substantial-question-of-law-is-involved\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | S. 100 CPC restricts the right of second appeal only to those cases where a substantial question of law is involved"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":172664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/01\/exists-substantial-question-law-miscellaneous-appeal-can-entertained\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":0},"title":"If there exists substantial question of law, miscellaneous appeal can be entertained","author":"Saba","date":"December 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur: The Court recently heard an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order of 2010 in a suit filed by plaintiffs for declaration, possession and permanent injunction which was dismissed by the trial court in 2009\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":1},"title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The contention that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 100 of CPC cannot be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant is maintainable before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge is a decree.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":157474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/19\/a-will-shrouded-by-suspicious-circumstances-cannot-be-held-to-be-a-valid-document\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":2},"title":"A will shrouded by suspicious circumstances cannot be held to be a valid document","author":"Saba","date":"September 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment passed by the Presiding Officer, Mandi whereby the suit for declaration having been filed by the appellant-plaintiff was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Sharma, J. held that there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":165294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/statute-ousting-jurisdiction-civil-court-required-strictly-construed\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":3},"title":"Any statute ousting the jurisdiction of Civil Court is required to be strictly construed","author":"Saba","date":"October 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a Regular Second Appeal holding that in the instant case, jurisdiction of the Civil Courts was ousted by Section 171 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954; and there was no substantial question of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211993,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/sc-yet-again-reminds-the-high-courts-of-the-limitations-under-section-100-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":4},"title":"SC yet again reminds the High Courts of the limitations under Section 100 CPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Court, yet again, reminded the High Courts of the limitations under Section 100 CPC and said: \u201cdespite the catena of decisions of this Court and even the mandate under Section 100 of the CPC, the High Courts under Section 100 CPC are disturbing the concurrent findings of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/21\/no-decree-shall-be-reversed-or-substantially-varied-if-it-does-not-result-in-miscarriage-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":237481,"position":5},"title":"No decree shall be reversed\u00a0 or substantially varied if it does not result in miscarriage of justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court at Goa: A Single Judge Bench comprising of C.V. Bhadang, J., dismissed an appeal filed against the concurrent findings of the courts below that resulted in decreeing the suit of the respondents. The matter related to the validity of the Will in question. The respondents had filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237481\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}