{"id":237347,"date":"2020-10-12T17:53:01","date_gmt":"2020-10-12T12:23:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237347"},"modified":"2020-10-23T13:27:27","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T07:57:27","slug":"del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press Release dated 03-09-2020 and Frequently Asked Questions issued by the respondent, BARC.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Jurisdiction to adjudicate the present dispute<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The basis of the present petition was that the disputes raised challenge raised by the petitioner to the above-mentioned communication and press release comes under the jurisdiction of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), however, the working of which is suspended due to COVID-19.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Impugned Communication<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent which is registered as a television rating agency introduced algorithms into its data validation method purported to mitigate the impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across all genres of television channels.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The said data was published on 03-09-2020 and thereafter, published every Thursday.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The above-stated communication was challenged before TDSAT, which was allowed. TRAI again challenged the order of TDSAT before the Supreme Court, wherein the Court held that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c.. we direct that the appellant shall not enforce Landing Page Regulations\/directions against the respondents and other similarly situated members of the Association.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the Supreme Court\u2019s decision, petitioners counsel submitted that, placement of television channels on the Landing Page is still permitted, though the operation of the Judgment of the TDSAT has been stayed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent has sought to restrict the rights of the television channels to be placed on the Landing Page on the same grounds as was sought to be done by TRAI.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Breaking down the High Court\u2019s decision<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to the maintainability of the petition, Bench referred to Clauses 19.1 and 24.1 of the Policy Guidelines issued by the Government of India according to which the respondent is governed by the provisions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 and any dispute between the Government of India and the respondent is to be raised before the TDSAT.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Section 14 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c14. Establishment of Appellate Tribunal- The Central Government shall, by notification, establish an Appellate Tribunal to be known as the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal to-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(a) adjudicate any dispute-<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(i) between a licensor and a licensee;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(ii) between two or more service providers;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(ii) between a service provide and a group of consumers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">End-User License Agreement executed between petitioner 1 and the respondent in Clause 6(v) and 9(i)(g)(v) allows the respondent to change the methodology used by it for the TV channel rating.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>End-User License Agreement<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Bench added that, once it is held that TDSAT would have jurisdiction under Section 14 of the TRAI Act, 1997 the same cannot be diversified through an Agreement between the parties and especially Clause 24 of the End User License Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Clause 5.4.2 of the Policy Guidelines requires the rating agency to use necessary algorithms to detect outliers having unusual viewing behaviour and discard such data.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Landing Page by a channel exaggerates viewership estimates by \u201cforcing viewership\u201d.\u00a0 The new methodology evolved by the respondent is after detailed study and testing across multiple genres and would ensure minimization of any \u201cfalse positives or negatives\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to its analysis, the Court stated that the respondent can be presumed to be an expert in the field as also in possession of knowledge of the industry and the steps required for its improvement. Decisions of such a body cannot be interfered with lightly.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cTDSAT was considering the powers of the TRAI to issue the Direction prohibiting placement of TV channels on the Landing Page and concluded that TRAI had no such powers under the provisions of the Act.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, petitioners could not make out the case of grant of interim injunction. It was however clarified that no observation in the present order shall bind the TDSAT in deciding any petition filed before it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Bennett Coleman &amp; Co. Ltd. v. Broadcast Audience Research Council of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/b73S9XLu\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Del 1330<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-09-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner&#8217;s Counsels:<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Senior Advocates Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Maninder Singh with Advocates, Kunal Tandon, Kumar Shashank Shekhar, Prabhas Bajaj, Amit Bhandari &amp; Amandeep Singh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent&#8217;s Counsels:<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul with Advocates Saikrishna Rajagopal, Sneha Jain, Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Sudarshana MJ &amp; Akash Lamba.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43766,2554,43767,29785,3891,43765,2771,43764,43768],"class_list":["post-237347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-india","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-landing-page","tag-law","tag-tdsat","tag-television-rating-agency","tag-TRAI","tag-trp","tag-tv-channel-rating"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-12T12:23:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-23T07:57:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-12T12:23:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-23T07:57:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-12T12:23:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-23T07:57:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","name":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-12T12:23:01+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-23T07:57:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":171724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/30\/tdsat-petition-rejected-ground-forum-non-conveniens\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":0},"title":"TDSAT: Petition rejected on ground of forum non-conveniens","author":"Saba","date":"November 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal: In the order passed by S.K. Singh, Chairperson (TDSAT), on the ground of jurisdiction (forum non-conveniens), the Tribunal asked the petitioner to exercise its remedy before the appropriate forum. The objection to the dismissed petition was raised by the respondent on the ground that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":156584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/15\/trai-acts-exclusive-jurisdiction-grants-exemption-from-seeking-high-courts-permission-to-proceed-with-pending-telecom-petitions\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":1},"title":"TRAI Act\u2019s exclusive jurisdiction grants exemption from seeking High Court\u2019s permission to proceed with pending telecom petitions","author":"Saba","date":"September 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): A group of three separate telecom and broadcasting petitions were directed against S. Tel Pvt. Ltd., Tulip Telecom Ltd., Loop Mobile (India) Pvt. Ltd. respectively as all of these companies had liquidation proceedings pending in different High Courts. The main issue for contention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":153994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":2},"title":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences","author":"Saba","date":"September 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television service provider duly registered as MSO\/cable operator had entered into an agreement with the respondent, Odisha Television Ltd., a broadcaster engaged in the business of distribution of television\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":3},"title":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) rejected the review application stating that the proceeding held and orders passed are on the basis of audit and other relevant materials for which sufficient opportunity was given to the parties. In the present application, the respondents were\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":33861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/27\/writ-petition-filed-by-star-india-dismissed-for-want-of-maintainability\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":4},"title":"Writ Petition filed by Star India dismissed for want of maintainability","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court- Dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the orders of Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal\u2019s (TDSAT) on the ground that the procedure adopted by the TDSAT in making the orders and the jurisdiction exercised in issuing the directions contained therein is beyond the powers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":229388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/12\/state-bank-of-india-v-chander-kalani-right-decision-based-on-incorrect-reasoning\/","url_meta":{"origin":237347,"position":5},"title":"State Bank of India v. Chander Kalani: Right decision based on incorrect reasoning\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Rhythm Buaria*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}