{"id":237073,"date":"2020-10-09T18:00:34","date_gmt":"2020-10-09T12:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=237073"},"modified":"2020-10-16T11:53:39","modified_gmt":"2020-10-16T06:23:39","slug":"jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Deepak Roshan J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the petition stating that the petitioner failed to show any error in the said judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case is that the petitioner was appointed in 1971 as Extra Clerk in the office of District Sub- Registrar, Latehar which was confirmed on 21-01-1981 and retired on 31-01-2000, but his retirement benefits has been fixed counting his service from 1981. The petitioner earlier moved the Court for same relief by filing writ application which was heard and disposed of with a direction to reconsider adding his past services as Extra Clerk to the total length of services and reassess the amount of pension etc. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 31.05.2011 passed by the I.G. Registration which has rejected the service of petitioner rendered as Extra Clerk to not be counted for pensionary benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for petitioner M.M. Sharma submitted that the said memo is illegal and has no leg to stand and that the petitioner having been served for 24 years deserve to be given benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondents were represented by Sreenu Garapati, Sudharshan Srivastava and Diwakar Upadhya. It was submitted that as per Bihar Govt. Finance Department Resolution dated 22-07-2003, it has been laid down that those extra clerk who have served minimum 240 days as Extra Clerk in one Calendar year; all those period of service since prior to the date of confirmation shall be computed for pension but since the petitioner did not work 240 days in any of the calendar Year\u2019s as Extra Clerk as such, his service period rendered as Extra Clerk are not fit to be counted for pensionary benefit. It was further laid down that said post was not substantive and permanent and was not being paid out of public exchequer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the petitioner was working as Extra Clerk on a temporary basis and his employment was not against any substantive and permanent post and he was not being paid out of public exchequer as provided under Rule 58 of the Jharkhand Pensions Rules and on the other hand, the petitioner has also not passed the accounts examination as well as he did not complete 240 working days in any calendar year as such, he could not take benefit of the resolution of the Finance Dept. Govt. of Bihar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on the judgment titled <em>State of<\/em> <em>Jharkhand v. Kauleshwar Prasad,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5KEzBJ8n\">2006 SCC OnLine Jhar 238<\/a> held that the period of Extra Clerk shall not be counted for the purpose of giving pensionary benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, impugned judgment upheld and petition dismissed.\u00a0 [Daya Shankar Prasad v. State of Jharkhand,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/N63xvD29\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Jhar 770<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-08-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the petition stating that the petitioner failed to show any <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12441,43738],"class_list":["post-237073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-pensionary-benefits","tag-public-exchequer"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the petition stating that the petitioner failed to show any\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-09T12:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-16T06:23:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-09T12:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-16T06:23:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the petition stating that the petitioner failed to show any","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-09T12:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-16T06:23:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/","name":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-09T12:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-16T06:23:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/09\/jhar-hc-pensionary-benefits-granted-only-when-served-against-a-permanent-or-substantive-post-and-salary-being-paid-out-of-public-exchequer-irrespective-of-duration-served-r-58-of-jharkhand-pension\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Pensionary Benefits granted only when served against a permanent or substantive post and salary being paid out of public exchequer irrespective of duration served; R. 58 of Jharkhand Pensions Rules applied"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325955,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/07\/ph-hc-directs-haryana-govt-to-refix-pension-pensionary-benefits-of-an-employee-who-was-reverted-after-his-retirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC directs Haryana Govt. to refix pension and pensionary benefits of an employee who was reverted after his retirement","author":"Arushi","date":"July 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that it is a settled law that after an employee\u2019s retirement, the master and servant relationship ceases to operate. If any action is required to be taken after the retirement of an ex-employee, then same can always be taken when there is an express authority of law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298884,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/08\/calcutta-high-court-directs-notional-appointment-for-pensionary-benefit-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Affected individuals should not lose pensionary benefits due to delay in appointment by authorities\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs notional appointment","author":"Ritu","date":"August 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner cannot be penalised for the delay caused by the respondent authorities in appointing the petitioner to the post in question.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":94931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":2},"title":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#8216;family member&#8217; eligible for pensionary benefits","author":"Saba","date":"December 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary benefits to the petitioner, the Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and Nisha Banu, JJ. held that as per sub-rule 5 of Rule 45 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial benefits with statutory and penal interest. In the present case the appellant was appointed as Chairman and later was appointed as Junior Account Clerk in Rural Works Department.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":344532,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-pensionary-benefits-daily-wage-worker-less-than-10-years-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":4},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC grants pensionary benefits to daily wage worker with less than 10 years of service","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petitioner had rendered more than 8 years but less than 10 years of service, thus, his service was to be treated as 10 years, which qualified him for pensionary benefits.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217429,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/29\/jhar-hc-past-service-of-the-petitioner-shall-be-taken-into-consideration-for-calculating-his-retiral-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":237073,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | Past service of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration for calculating his retiral benefits\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi J., allowed the petition and held that past service of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration for calculating his retiral benefits. The factual matrix of the instant petition that in the year 1981, an advertisement was published by the Principal, Bokaro Steel City\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237073\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}