{"id":236911,"date":"2020-10-08T10:00:08","date_gmt":"2020-10-08T04:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236911"},"modified":"2020-10-08T21:17:49","modified_gmt":"2020-10-08T15:47:49","slug":"kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J., while allowing the criminal revision in part, remarked that, if the accused seeks to take defense of truth under Section 499 Penal Code, 1860, it is upon him to prove that the statements made are facts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Brief Facts<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present criminal revision is instituted under Section 397 read with Section 401 Criminal Procedure Code, praying to set aside the judgment and sentence confirmed in criminal appeal no. 815 of 2010 by Additional Sessions Judge and also to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence, passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No. 11445 of 2006, thereby acquitting the petitioner against charges of defamation under Section 500 IPC. The series of events leading to the present petition has been summarized hereunder:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>That the respondent-husband had instituted a case for restitution of conjugal rights against the petitioner which was decreed in his favour.<\/li>\n<li>That in the suit for conjugal rights, the wife made serious allegations against the husband questioning his character, repute, conduct and behaviour against which the husband filed a criminal case (CC No. 11445 of 2006), alleging the offences punishable under Section 500, 191, 193 IPC, 1860.<\/li>\n<li>That the said criminal case, after trial, ended in the conviction of the accused wife for the offence punishable under Section 500 IPC and was further directed to undergo a simple imprisonment for a period of one month along with payment of fine amounting to Rs 5000.<\/li>\n<li>Challenging the sentence and conviction, the wife preferred a Criminal Appeal in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed by an order dated, 15-02-2012, confirming the decision of the Trial Court.<\/li>\n<li>That against the said confirmation and the judgment, the present criminal revision petition no. 152 of 2014 has been preferred by the wife and seeking enhancement of sentence, ordered by the Trial Court, a criminal revision petition no. 1358 of 2010 has been sought by the complainant (husband).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Both these Criminal Revision Petitions have been treated as connected matters and were taken up together for hearing and disposal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Issue<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Whether the complainant has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused has committed an offence punishable under Section 500 IPC?<\/li>\n<li>Whether the sentence, as passed by the trial court, deserves to be enhanced?<\/li>\n<li>Whether the judgments and order on sentence impugned under these revision petitions suffer with any illegality, impropriety, warranting interference at the hands of the Court?<strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">\u00a0<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Observations<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while reproducing Section 500 IPC, said, <em>\u201cIn order to be defamatory, a publication must tend to lower the complainant in the opinion of men whose standard of opinion, the Court can properly recognize or tend to induce them to entertain an ill-opinion of him. However, the complainant need not show a tendency of imputation to prejudice him in the eye of every one in the community or all of his associates, but it is sufficient to establish that the publication tends to lower him in the estimation of a substantial, respectable group, even though they are totally different community or of the complainant\u2019s associates.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further cited opinions of several Courts with respect to whether pleadings can constitute publication to determine the offence of Defamation, under Section 500 IPC.<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong><em>Chiranshree Das v. Amitabh Das,<\/em><\/strong> reported in LAWS(KAR)-2018-8-304; <em>\u201cMaking a defamatory matter known after it has been written to some person other than the person for whom it is written is a \u2018publication\u2019 in its legal sense. A defamatory matter must, therefore, be communicated to some person other than the person concerning whom it is written.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong><em>Madhuri Mukund v. Mukund Martand<\/em>,<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MF565Ml4\">1990 SCC OnLine Bom 410<\/a>, <em>\u201cBombay High Court observed that the imputations made in a proceeding which is filed in a Court is clearly a publication. It further observed that even a publication to an authority over the person against whom imputations are made must be held to be sufficient publication falling within the purview of Section 499 IPC.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong><em>K. Prabhakaran v. Gangadharan<\/em><\/strong><em>,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/or805Zkn\">2006 SCC OnLine Ker 302<\/a>, <em>\u201cKerala High Court, in a matter where it is alleged that defamatory statements against complainant were made in a written statement filed before the Court held that, once a statement has been filed in the Court of law, that statement can be taken as published. If such statement amounts to per se defamatory, then it is the duty of the accused to establish that, they are justified in making such a statement under any of the exceptions to Section 499 IPC.\u201d <\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong><em>Sanjay Mishra v. NCT of Delhi,<\/em><\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sW9rXIPG\">2012 SCCOnLine Del 1779<\/a>, <em>\u201cFor criminal purposes \u2018publication\u2019 has a wider meaning than it has in Civil Law, since it includes a communication to the person defamed alone. The prosecution for defamation in criminal cases can be brought although the only publication is to the person defamed as it is very likely to provoke a breach between the persons involved.\u201d <\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong><em>Thangavelu Chettiar v. Ponnamal,<\/em><\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/JfEzR9y7\">1965 SCC OnLine Mad 248<\/a>, <em>\u201cMadras High Court was pleased to observe that, there can be no doubt that the defamation contained in the plaint was published by the plaint being filed in the Court.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further, examined the statements made by the wife before the trial court and said, <em>\u201cThe contents of the statements of the accused, per se, reveal that the allegations are defamatory in nature unless they are shown to be falling under any of the exceptions within Section 499 IPC.\u201d<\/em><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Allowing the criminal revision in part, the Court upheld the conviction on the ground of disclosing the allegations in the plaint to her relatives and friend. The sentence of simple imprisonment for the period of one month was set aside, on considerate terms and the fine amount was increased from Rs 5000 to Rs 15000.[Sushma Rani v. Nagaraja Rao, Criminal Revision Petition No. 152 of 2014, decided on 1-10-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J., while allowing the criminal revision in part, remarked that, if the accused seeks to take <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43723,2812,35745,33123],"class_list":["post-236911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-revision-petitions","tag-defamation","tag-section-499-ipc","tag-section-500-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-\u2502-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J., while allowing the criminal revision in part, remarked that, if the accused seeks to take\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-\u2502-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-08T04:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-08T15:47:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-08T04:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-08T15:47:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-\u2502-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J., while allowing the criminal revision in part, remarked that, if the accused seeks to take","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-\u2502-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-08T04:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-08T15:47:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","name":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-08T04:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-08T15:47:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/04\/allegation-of-impotency-in-matrimonial-dispute-not-defamation-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":0},"title":"Allegation of impotency against husband in a matrimonial dispute not defamation: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, allegations are by way of written words before the police and before the judicial authorities, thus, such imputation will amount to defamation when the case does not fall within either of the ten exceptions to Section 499.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allegation of impotency not defamation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/allegation-of-impotency-not-defamation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/allegation-of-impotency-not-defamation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/allegation-of-impotency-not-defamation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/allegation-of-impotency-not-defamation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315785,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/cal-hc-quashes-defamation-proceeding-against-altruist-monk-in-absence-of-essential-elements-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court quashes Defamation proceeding against altruist monk in absence of essential elements","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCriminal defamation is not a disproportionate restriction on free speech, because protection of reputation is a fundamental right as well as a human right.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/07\/gujarat-hc-refuses-to-stay-rahul-gandhi-conviction-in-defamation-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat HC rejects Rahul Gandhi&#8217;s plea to stay Conviction in Modi Surname Defamation Case","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years imprisonment for offence under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC for his \u2018all thieves have Modi surname\u2019 remark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/30\/section-499-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":3},"title":"All HC | Onus of proving ingredients under the First Exception, S. 499 IPC is on the accused; Defence being a question of fact cannot be claimed at the stage of issuance of summons","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. dismissed the petition and declined to entertain the present application in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. The instant application was filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No.10 of 2019 under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/22\/madras-hc-state-cannot-launch-prosecution-under-s-1992-of-crpc-for-defamation-whimsically-without-any-application-of-mind\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC | State cannot launch prosecution under S. 199(2) of CrPC for defamation whimsically, without any application of mind","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While answering important questions related to freedom of press; meaning of criminal defamation against the State and requisites of Section 199(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, the Single Judge Bench of Abdul Quddhose, J., observed that, application of mind by the State to the materials placed on record\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":47041,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/13\/criminal-defamation-law-constitutionally-valid-right-to-free-speech-does-not-mean-the-right-to-defame-others\/","url_meta":{"origin":236911,"position":5},"title":"Criminal defamation law constitutionally valid; right to free speech does not mean the right to defame others","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Writing down the 268 pages long judgment where the constitutional validity of Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Sections 199(1) to 199(4) CrPC was upheld, the bench of Dipak Misra and P.C. Pant, JJ stated that it is difficult to come to a conclusion that the existence of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}