{"id":236870,"date":"2020-10-07T16:30:35","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T11:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236870"},"modified":"2020-10-07T15:58:57","modified_gmt":"2020-10-07T10:28:57","slug":"guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","title":{"rendered":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court:<\/strong> S.H. Vohra, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved against the order of detention passed by the respondent \u2013 detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 detaining the petitioner \u2013 detenue as defined under Section 2(b) of the Act.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the detenue, Jayshree C Bhatt, submitted that the order of detention impugned in this petition deserves to be quashed and set aside on the ground of registration of offences under Sections 65(e), 81, etc. of the Prohibition Act by itself cannot bring the case of the detenue within the purview of the definition under Section 2(b) of the Act. It was further submitted that illegal activity likely to be carried out or alleged to have been carried out, as alleged, cannot have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of public order and at the most, it can be said to be breach of law and order and that it is not possible to hold on the basis of the facts of the present case that activity of the detenue with respect to the criminal cases had affected even tempo of the society causing threat to the very existence of normal and routine life of people at large.<\/p>\n

The Court while allowing the appeal held that considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it appeared that the subjective satisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority cannot be said to be legal, valid and in accordance with law, and the allegations as have been leveled against the detenue cannot be said to be germane for the purpose of bringing the detenue within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Act. The Court referred to the Supreme Court judgment of Pushker Mukherjee v. State of West Bengal, <\/em>(1969) 1 SCC 10<\/a> where the distinction between ‘law and order’ and ‘public order’ had been clearly laid down. The Court had observed as follows:<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cDoes the expression “public order” take in every kind of infraction of order or only some categories thereof? It is manifest that every act of assault or injury to specific persons does not lead to public disorder. When two people quarrel and fight and assault each other inside a house or in a street, it may be said that there is disorder but not public disorder. Such cases are dealt with under the powers vested in the executive authorities under the provisions of ordinary criminal law but the culprits cannot be detained on the ground that they were disturbing public order. The contravention of any law always affects order but before it can be said to affect public order, it must affect the community or the public at large. In this connection we must draw a line of demarcation between serious and aggravated forms of disorder which directly affect the community or injure the public interest and the relatively minor breaches of peace of a purely local significance which primarily injure specific individuals and only in a secondary sense public interest. A mere disturbance of law and order leading to disorder is thus not necessarily sufficient for action under the Preventive Detention Act but a disturbance which will affect public order comes within the scope of the Act.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court explained that unless and until, the material is there to make out a case that the person has become a threat and menace to the Society so as to disturb the whole tempo of the society and that all social apparatus is in peril of disturbing public order at the instance of such person, it cannot be said that the detenue is a person within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Act and in the present case except general statements, there was no material on record which showed that the detenue was acting in such a manner, which was dangerous to the public order.[Lalman v. State of Gujarat, R\/Special Civil Application No. 10137 of 2019, decided on 09-10-2019]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court: S.H. Vohra, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved against the order of detention passed by the respondent <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":206146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43714,33966,33530],"class_list":["post-236870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-breach-of-law","tag-detenue","tag-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act"],"yoast_head":"\nGuj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court: S.H. Vohra, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved against the order of detention passed by the respondent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-07T11:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-07T11:00:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty","og_description":"Gujarat High Court: S.H. Vohra, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved against the order of detention passed by the respondent","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-07T11:00:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","name":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-07T11:00:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/30\/fir-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":0},"title":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Detention order quashed","author":"Editor","date":"March 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Rajendra M. Sareen, J. allowed a petition which was directed against the detention order passed by respondent\u2013detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (\u201cthe Act\u201d) by detaining the petitioner-detenue as defined under section 2(b)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/act-affecting-public-order-must-affect-the-community-at-large-detenue-under-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act-released\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":1},"title":"Act affecting public order must affect the community at large; detenue under Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act released","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.H. Vora, J., allowed a petition against the detention orders passed under Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The petition was directed against order of detention passed by the respondent in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":141251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/07\/gujarat-hc-sets-aside-the-order-of-detention-passed-under-the-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act-1985\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat HC sets aside the order of detention passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985","author":"Saba","date":"July 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: In a recent judgment, a Single Judge Bench of S.H. Vora, J. passed an order setting aside the detention order passed by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner contended that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/failure-on-part-of-detaining-authority-to-supply-material-renders-detention-order-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":3},"title":"Failure on part of detaining authority to supply material renders detention order illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the district judge of preventive custody. The detenue was arrested from his home for the commission of offences punishable under Section 121-A RPC, 7\/25 Arms Act and 13\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/jk-and-ladakh-hc-number-of-acts-not-to-be-determined-for-detention-of-an-individual-but-impact-of-the-acts-preventive-detention\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":4},"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC| Number of acts not to be determined for detention of an individual, but impact of the act(s) [Preventive Detention]","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, J. dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the detention order in terms of Section (3) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (\u2018NDPS Act\u2019) issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir (\u2018Detaining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":236870,"position":5},"title":"J&K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, \u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on the detenue is a very precious constitutional right and the object behind the same is to enable the detenue to file an effective representation. It will be an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236870\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/206146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}