{"id":236863,"date":"2020-10-07T13:05:52","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T07:35:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236863"},"modified":"2020-10-16T12:07:20","modified_gmt":"2020-10-16T06:37:20","slug":"jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court: <\/strong>Shree Chandrashekhar J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The case at hand involves murder of a woman Bhondi Khariain by her husband who was found dead at her own residence and her husband found to be absconding. An informant who is a co villager John Kullu informed the police about the same pursuant to which an FIR was registered under Section 300 of Penal Code, 1860 i.e. IPC. An investigation followed by trial was conducted before Additional District and Session, Judge, Fast Track Court who convicted and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs 5000 under Section 302 IPC for committing murder of his wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present case solely is based on circumstantial evidence due to lack of any eye witness available. The Court relied on a judgment titled <em>Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. \u00a0State of Maharashtra, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FL6d5497\">(1984) 4 SCC 116<\/a> and observed that in a case based on the circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish the incriminating circumstances by leading cogent and consistent evidence and the circumstances so proved against an accused must lead to irresistible conclusion that it was the accused and the accused alone who has committed the crime and no other hypothesis consistent with the innocence can be inferred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Circumstantial Evidence 1: Dead body of Bhondi Khariain was found in the house of the appellant<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to few witnesses turning hostile later during cross-examination and denied making any statement before police regarding accepting that they saw the husband murdering his wife by strangulation through a rope or even seeing the dead body etc, the court relied on a judgment titled <em>Lahu Kamlakar Patil v. State of Maharashtra,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wrvxUj67\">(2013) 6 SCC 417<\/a> and observed that <strong>the evidence of a hostile witness is not liable to be rejected altogether rather it can be used by the prosecution to corroborate its case against the accused.<\/strong> The Court thus believed through this that the deceased died in her matrimonial home.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Circumstantial Evidence 2:\u00a0 The Medical Evidence <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The post mortem report clearly states that the eyes of the deceased were partially open; mouth open and tongue protruded outside the mouth, fracture of thyroid cartilage and subcutaneous tissues under the ligature mark were ecchymosed with bruising of neck muscles, colour bluish. The doctor based on above finding stated that this is a case of accidental death or suicide. The court relied on judgment <em>Vadugu Chanti Babu v. State of A.P.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ss62YfY4\">(2002) 6 SCC 547<\/a>\u00a0and observed that <strong>a stray statement of the doctor in his cross-examination is not a conclusive opinion but it is only a possibility.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Circumstantial Evidence 3: The appellant was found absconding<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During examination of the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appellant was put this circumstance that he has killed his wife by throttling through a rope in the night of 12.03.2006, however, except stating that it is false and he has not committed the crime, he has not offered any explanation how his wife has died. The Court relied on a judgment titled <em>State of Maharashtra v. Suresh <\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Fr49dzq1\">(2000) 1 SCC 471<\/a> and observed that offering no explanation or evasive reply to an incriminating circumstance cannot form the basis for conviction of an accused, but a husband must say something how his wife has died in his house. In a situation like this, the appellant&#8217;s offering no explanation on death of his wife would by itself become an incriminating circumstance which would provide a link in the chain of the circumstances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>On Law of Circumstantial Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on judgment titled <em>Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Yz6i6QpT\">(2006) 10 SCC 681<\/a> and observed:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c<\/em><strong>12. <\/strong><em>\u2026.\u2026..The normal principle in a case based on circumstantial evidence is that the circumstances from which an inference of guilt is sought to be drawn must be cogently and firmly established: that those circumstances should be of a definite tendency unerringly pointing towards the guilt of the accused: that the circumstances taken cumulatively should form a chain so complete that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human probability the crime was committed by the accused and they should be incapable of explanation on any hypothesis other than that of the guilt of the accused and inconsistent with their innocence.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0<\/em>The Court after hearing facts and perusing the circumstantial evidences in detail held the accused guilty on grounds that the prosecution has led cogent and consistent evidence on the homicidal death of Bhondi Khariain even though the motive for the crime has not been established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the impugned judgment upheld and the appeal dismissed.[Kandra Kharia v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/b8zXf7TY\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 2730<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26-11-2019]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court: Shree Chandrashekhar J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The case at hand <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3433,2948,4571],"class_list":["post-236863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-murder","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc\u2502-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Shree Chandrashekhar J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The case at hand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc\u2502-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-07T07:35:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-16T06:37:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-07T07:35:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-16T06:37:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc\u2502-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Shree Chandrashekhar J., upheld the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The case at hand","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc\u2502-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-07T07:35:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-16T06:37:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/","name":"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-07T07:35:52+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-16T06:37:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-law-on-circumstantial-evidence-reiterated-abscondence-alone-may-not-be-a-determinative-factor-to-infer-guilt-under-s-302-ipc-but-when-medical-evidence-discloses-homicidal-death-abs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Abscondence alone may not be a determinative factor to infer guilt under S. 302 IPC but when medical evidence discloses homicidal death abscondence becomes a relevant fact \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":0},"title":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the conviction of the appellant-wife under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her husband was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(II). The appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/26\/abscondence-of-an-accused-by-itself-does-not-establish-his-guilt\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Abscondence of an accused by itself does not establish his guilt; Conviction and sentence for punishment of murder set aside","author":"Editor","date":"May 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Joymalya Bagchi and Ananya Bandyopadhyay, JJ. allowed an appeal which was directed against the judgment and order convicting the appellant for commission of offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":142961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/17\/split-decision-over-culpability-of-a-woman-under-section-201-ipc-for-being-silent-about-the-murder-of-her-husband-by-her-lover\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":2},"title":"Split decision over culpability of a woman under Section 201 IPC for being silent about the murder of her husband by her lover","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a 2-decade old matter relating to culpability of the accused under Section 201 IPC pertaining to disappearance of evidence in the case of the murder of her husband, the bench of N. V. Ramana and P.C. Pant, JJ gave a split decision and placed the matter before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/17\/sc-upholds-husband-conviction-who-absconded-for-10-years-after-killing-wife-in-1990\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":3},"title":"SC upholds conviction of man after 34 years, who absconded for 10 years after killing wife in 1990","author":"Editor","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The wife was found dead in the house in May, 1990. It was after several attempts for years, that the husband was apprehended on 09-08-2000 nearly ten years after the incident.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"husband's conviction after killing wife in 1990","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/husbands-conviction-after-killing-wife-in-1990.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/husbands-conviction-after-killing-wife-in-1990.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/husbands-conviction-after-killing-wife-in-1990.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/husbands-conviction-after-killing-wife-in-1990.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn noticing the presence of the ex-husband (deceased) in his house, the husband caused the death of the deceased in order to safeguard his right over person (wife) without any premeditation or intention. The case fell within the ambit of Exception 2 to Section 300 of the IPC on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311014,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/09\/cal-hc-affirms-convictions-establishing-robbery-murder-and-rape-in-night-time-dacoity-case-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":236863,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms convictions in night-time dacoity involving robbery, murder and rape","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCredible evidence even of a hostile witness can form the basis for conviction in a criminal trial and his\/her evidence can be accepted, if he\/she is a natural and independent witness.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236863\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}