{"id":236857,"date":"2020-10-07T11:00:18","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T05:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236857"},"modified":"2020-10-07T09:33:49","modified_gmt":"2020-10-07T04:03:49","slug":"ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court: <\/strong>P. Somarajan, while dismissing a plea for quashing of FIR against parallel charges under Penal Code, 1860 and other enactments, said, <em>\u201cIt is not a mere case of violation of provisions contained in the special enactment\u201d <\/em>and the applicability of overriding cannot strictly apply.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Brief Facts<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present writ petition is sought for quashing of FIR against the petitioner, on the ground that the accused cannot be charged for an offence under IPC when the same is covered by provisions of a special enactment. The alleged FIR was registered against the accused under Sections 124A and 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4 and 20, Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Sections 3 and 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wNz74jV9\">http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wNz74jV9<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XiSCXTmY\">http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XiSCXTmY<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yt2p0O70\">http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yt2p0O70<\/a><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Contentions<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner relied on the legal proposition as laid down under <em>State of Uttar Pradesh v. Aman Mittal<\/em> [2020 (1) KLT 260 (SC)], wherein the Supreme Court observed that section 3 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, completely overrides the provisions of Chapter XIII of Indian Penal Code and as such, the accused cannot be charged for the same offence under Chapter XIII of IPC. Essentially, the main argument was that the provisions of a special enactment shall exclude the scope of general enactment and given to the facts and circumstances of the present case, the FIR comprising sections of IPC must be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Observations<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that Sections 4 and 20 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Sections 3 and 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 are distinct offences having no overriding effect over Chapter XIII of Indian Penal Code. Further, the allegation levelled against is not confining to the provisions contained in the special enactment but extend to the offence of sedition punishable under Section 124A of IPC and the offence of cheating by playing deception on the statutory authority. It is not a mere case of violation of any of the provisions contained in the special enactment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While dismissing the instant case, the Court said, <em>\u201cthere cannot be any overriding effect especially when the allegation levelled against would prima facie satisfy the ingredients which would attract sedition as defined under Section 124A IPC by maintaining a parallel telephone exchange in secrecy and also the offence of cheating by playing deception on the statutory authority causing unlawful loss and gaining unlawful enrichment.\u201d<\/em>[Firoz v. State of Kerala, Crl. MC. No. 2220 of 2020, decided on 24-09-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: P. Somarajan, while dismissing a plea for quashing of FIR against parallel charges under Penal Code, 1860 and other <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43713,29785,43712,43711],"class_list":["post-236857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-indian-wireless-telegraphy-act","tag-law","tag-special-enactment","tag-telegraph-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: P. Somarajan, while dismissing a plea for quashing of FIR against parallel charges under Penal Code, 1860 and other\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-07T05:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-07T05:30:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed","og_description":"Kerala High Court: P. Somarajan, while dismissing a plea for quashing of FIR against parallel charges under Penal Code, 1860 and other","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-07T05:30:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/","name":"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-07T05:30:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/ker-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-where-special-enactment-overrides-general-enactment-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Court discusses legal position where special enactment overrides general enactment; petition dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":269841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/allahabad-high-court-sections-4-not-when-criminal-jurisdiction-is-invoked\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court | Sections 4 &#038; 5 CrPC only applicable to proceedings under Special Acts; not when criminal jurisdiction is invoked","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Gautam Chowdhary, JJ. dismissed a petition which was filed praying for quashment of the impugned FIR under Sections 420, 406, 120-B Penal Code, 1860. First informant aged about 28 years, does business and petitioner 1 and 2 are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/06\/calcutta-high-court-examines-validity-of-police-investigation-under-fss-act-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":1},"title":"FSSAI | Can Police, not being Food Safety Officers, investigate food safety matters punishable under IPC? Calcutta High Court examines","author":"Ritu","date":"August 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court dismissed all the three criminal revision applications seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings and deemed them groundless.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/14\/sexual-harassment-cases-cannot-quashed-on-basis-of-compromise-between-parties-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":2},"title":"[S. 482 CrPC] Compromise between parties cannot be sole basis to quash proceedings\/ FIR in sexual harassment cases, they affect society: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Before exercising the power under Section 482 of CrPC, the High Court must have due regard to the nature and gravity of the crime besides observing and holding that heinous and serious offences could not be quashed even though a victim or victim\u2019s family and the offender had settled.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Quashing sexual harassment case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Quashing-sexual-harassment-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Quashing-sexual-harassment-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Quashing-sexual-harassment-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Quashing-sexual-harassment-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":153624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/31\/moratorium-provisions-under-maharashtra-relief-undertakings-special-provisions-act-1958-repugnant-to-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-of-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":3},"title":"Moratorium provisions under Maharashtra Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions Act), 1958 repugnant to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of 2016","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dealing with the question relating to applicability of the Maharashtra Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions Act), 1958 vis-a-vis the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of 2016, the bench of RF Nariman and SK Kaul, JJ held that the State law is repugnant to the Parliamentary enactment as under the said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/29\/allahabad-high-court-inherent-power-u-s-482-cr-p-c-cannot-be-invoked-ignoring-the-statutory-dispensation-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":4},"title":"When statutory remedy is created by enactment, exercise of inherent power under S.482 cannot be invoked ignoring statutory dispensation: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the cases relied upon by the accused are not applicable to the present case, as they are silent over the issue of maintainability of the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after insertion of Section 14-A of SC\/ST Act, 1989 and unless the said issue is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/14\/all-hc-ingredients-constituting-offence-prima-facie-made-out-fir-cannot-be-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":236857,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Ingredients constituting offence prima facie made out \u2013 FIR cannot be quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Karuna Nand Bajpayee and Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ. dismissed a petition seeking quashing of a First Information Report filed against the petitioner for offences committed under Sections 148, 307, 353 and 504 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 7 of the Unlawful\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236857\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}