{"id":236590,"date":"2020-10-01T19:18:14","date_gmt":"2020-10-01T13:48:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236590"},"modified":"2020-10-04T17:44:29","modified_gmt":"2020-10-04T12:14:29","slug":"supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"

TOP STORIES<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Advance tax ruling system| Detailed report on what the Supreme Court said<\/a><\/h4>\n

The bench of SK Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ has recommended the Central Government to consider the efficacy of the advance tax ruling system and make it more comprehensive as a tool for settlement of disputes rather than battling it through different tiers, whether private or public sectors are involved. It suggested that a council for Advance Tax Ruling based on the Swedish model and the New Zealand system may be a possible way forward.<\/p>\n

SC gives 10 years\u2019 time to Telecos to pay AGR dues<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cThe TSPs make payment in yearly instalments commencing from 1.4.2021 up to 31.3.2031 payable by 31st March of every succeeding financial year.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Can an unmarried Hindu daughter claim maintenance from her father? SC clarifies the legal position<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cThe maintenance as contemplated under Act, 1956 is a larger concept as compared to concept of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C..\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The \u2018precise\u2019 time of publication of E-gazette significant to determine enforceability of Notifications<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cIn the era of the electronic publication of gazette notifications and electronic filing of bills of entry, the revised rate of import duty under the Notification 5\/2019 applies to bills of entry presented for home consumption after the notification was uploaded in the e-Gazette at 20:46:58 hours on 16 February 2019.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

SC acquits a man in a rape case dating back to 1999| How a failed love affair led to a 21-year-long legal battle<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cIf the appellant had married her, she would not have lodged the case.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

NLAT Quashed; CLAT-2020 to be conducted on September 28 for all NLUs including NLSIU, Bengaluru<\/a><\/h4>\n

The Universities are not powerless to modify their Academic Calendar looking to the pandemic. The Academic year 2020-21 is not a normal academic year in which Universities are expected to carry on their teaching and other activities in normal mode and manner. NLSIU could have very well found out ways and means to start the academic Under-Graduate Law course even if it starts in mid of October 2020 after conduct of the CLAT on 28.09.2020<\/em>.<\/p>\n

NLU Jodhpur student\u2019s death| SC orders fresh investigation by a new Investigation team after Rajasthan Police hastily submits a \u2018very lengthy\u2019 closure report<\/a><\/h4>\n

The interest of justice requires a de novo investigation to be done, to sustain the confidence of the society in the rule of law irrespective of who the actors may be.<\/p>\n

SC stays the telecast of Sudarshan News\u2019 \u2018UPSC Jihad\u2019 show; says it prima facie appears like an attempt to vilify the Muslim community<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cAn insidious attempt has been made to insinuate that the community is involved in a conspiracy to infiltrate the civil services.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Maratha Reservation| Implementation of Maharashtra State Reservation Act stayed; Larger bench to interpret Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cImplementation of the Act for admissions in educational institutions and appointments to public posts during the pendency of these Appeals will cause irreparable loss to the candidates belonging to the open category. It will be difficult to cancel the admissions made in the educational institutions and appointments made to the public posts by implementing the reservations as per the Act.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

MORE STORIES<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

When can a subsequent legislation be applied retrospectively? SC explains<\/a><\/h4>\n

For application of a subsequent legislation retrospectively it is necessary to show that the previous legislation had any omission or ambiguity or it was intended to explain an earlier act.\u00a0In absence of the above ingredients, a legislation cannot be regarded as having retrospective effect<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n

SC lists 8 directions to prevent deterioration of Shivlinga at Mahakaleshwar Temple Ujjain<\/a><\/h4>\n

In a bid to prevent the deterioration of Shivlinga at Mahakaleshwar Temple, Ujjain, the 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, BR Gavai and Krishna Murari, JJ has issued elaborate directions.<\/p>\n

Scandalous allegations against SC judges| Exemplary cost of Rs. 25, 000 on Rashid Khan Pathan for filing repetitive applications seeking recall of May 4 order<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cIf the Appellant continues to file such repetitive applications in this litigation which are not maintainable, he will be visited with deterrent actions referred above such as initiation of criminal contempt proceedings or a direction to the Registry that no further applications in this litigation will be received.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bangalore Club not liable to pay wealth tax; SC explains when Section 21AA of Wealth Tax Act applies<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cBangalore Club is an association of persons and not the creation, by a person who is otherwise assessable, of one among a large number of associations of persons without defining the shares of the members so as to escape tax liability. For all these reasons, it is clear that Section 21AA of the Wealth Tax Act does not get attracted to the facts of the present case.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Can Section 302 IPC be applied in a case of single injury? SC clarifies<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cThe nature of injury, the part of the body where it is caused, the weapon used in causing such injury are the indicators of the fact whether the accused caused the death of the deceased with an intention of causing death or not.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Can strict rules of evidence be applied to disciplinary proceedings? Here\u2019s what SC says<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201c\u2026 in a disciplinary enquiry, strict rules of evidence and procedure of a criminal trial are inapplicable, like say, statements made before enquiry officers can be relied upon in certain instances.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

SC gives a go ahead to enforcement of Malaysian arbitral award in Government versus Vedanta; says it doesn\u2019t contravene public policy of India<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cThe enforcement court may \u201crefuse\u201d enforcement of a foreign award, if the conditions contained in Section 48 are made out. This would be evident from the language of the Section itself, which provides that enforcement of a foreign award may be \u201crefused\u201d only if the applicant furnishes proof of any of the conditions contained in Section 48 of the Act.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act has to be construed in a liberal, purposive manner that is fair and promotes justice<\/a><\/h4>\n

Even though the power of the Court to direct specific performance of an agreement may have been discretionary, such power could not be arbitrary. The discretion had necessarily to be exercised in accordance with sound and reasonable judicial principles.<\/p>\n

Is active involvement in the commission of offence a pre-condition for common intention? SC answers<\/a><\/h4>\n

The presence of the mental element or the intention to commit the act if cogently established is sufficient for conviction, without actual participation in the assault. It is therefore not necessary that before a person is convicted on the ground of common intention, he must be actively involved in the physical activity of assault. If the nature of evidence displays a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the plan, common intention can be inferred.<\/p>\n

CLAT| Nothing wrong with WB NUJS\u2019s decision to apply 30% domicile reservation rule from next year: SC<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cThe grievance of the appellant was that 30% of the seats were reserved for the students domiciled in the State of West Bengal when the Act was amended on 21st May 2019. The Act had come into force before CLAT was conducted, but the benefit of reservation had not been extended to the students by the University in the Academic Session 2019-2020.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

To prove case under NDPS Act, ownership of the vehicle not required to be established and proved<\/a><\/h4>\n

What is required to be established and proved is the recovery of the contraband articles and the commission of an offence under the NDPS Act.<\/p>\n

Are words \u201ctries an offence\u201d more appropriate than \u201ctries an offender\u201d in section 461(l) CrPC? Here\u2019s what SC says<\/a><\/h4>\n

The words \u201ctries an offence\u201d are more appropriate than the words \u201ctries an offender\u201d in section 461 (l)<\/strong>.<\/strong>\u00a0This is because, lack of jurisdiction to try an offence cannot be cured by section 462 and hence section 461, logically, could have included the trial of an offence by a Magistrate, not empowered by law to do so, as one of the several items which make the proceedings void.<\/p>\n

Jharkhand State Open School a sham; SC \u2018reluctantly\u2019 refuses to allow students with JSOS certificates to continue their courses at APJAKTU<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cWe do have sympathy but this is not a case where we can really translate our sympathy to a relief in the present case, more so, in view of the fact that since this exam system is found to be fraudulent, the petitioners before us will never have a recognized plus two status and to give such students the opportunity to get a degree from the University will create a great anomaly.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Can\u2019t allow Judicial officers to club their services rendered as advocates to claim eligibility for elevation as High Court judge: SC<\/a><\/h4>\n

\u201cHopping on and hopping off from one queue to the other, is not permissible. Today, if any of the petitioners cease to be Judicial Officers and become Advocates, they may be eligible to be considered against the quota intended for the Bar. But while continuing as Judicial Officers, they cannot seek to invoke Explanation (a) as it applies only to those who have become advocates after having held a judicial office.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

SC orders revised schedule for appointment of judicial officers in West Bengal; MP HC\u2019s Examination Committee to review the situation within a month before taking a decision<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

SC refuses to direct MoE and UGC to frame guidelines for regulation of fees structure in Universities and Central Institutions<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Withdrawal of GHCAA President Yatin Oza\u2019s senior designation| SC decides to wait for Gujarat High Court\u2019s order<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

IN OTHER NEWS<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

6 Years and over 300 Judgments later, Justice Arun Mishra bids adieu to the Supreme Court<\/a><\/h4>\n

Supreme Court releases a 17-page User Guide for limited physical hearings<\/a><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TOP STORIES Advance tax ruling system| Detailed report on what the Supreme Court said The bench of SK Kaul and Indu Malhotra, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":218562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,34119],"tags":[43657],"class_list":["post-236590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-scmonthly","tag-roundup"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"TOP STORIES Advance tax ruling system| Detailed report on what the Supreme Court said The bench of SK Kaul and Indu Malhotra,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-01T13:48:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-04T12:14:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-01T13:48:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-04T12:14:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020","og_description":"TOP STORIES Advance tax ruling system| Detailed report on what the Supreme Court said The bench of SK Kaul and Indu Malhotra,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-01T13:48:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-04T12:14:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/","name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-01T13:48:14+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-04T12:14:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2020\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2020"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235797,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/14\/advance-tax-ruling-system-detailed-report-on-what-the-supreme-court-said\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":0},"title":"Advance tax ruling system| Detailed report on what the Supreme Court said","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of SK Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ has recommended the Central Government to consider the efficacy of the advance tax ruling system and make it more comprehensive as a tool for settlement of disputes rather than battling it through different tiers, whether private or public sectors\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/supreme-court-yearly-roundup-2020-in-review\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court Yearly Roundup – 2020 in review","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"JANUARY 2020 Story of the month 5-judge bench holds no time limit could be fixed while granting anticipatory bail https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-january-2020\/ FEBRUARY 2020 Story of the month Grant permanent commission to all women officers in Army who opt for it within 3 months: SC to Centre https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/06\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-february-2020\/ MARCH 2020 Story of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/form-and-manner-of-filing-appeal-to-the-high-court-on-ruling-pronounced-or-order-passed-by-the-board-for-advance-rulings-introduced-videincome-tax-sixteenth-amendment-rules-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":2},"title":"Form and manner of filing appeal to the High Court on ruling pronounced or order passed by the Board for Advance Rulings introduced vide Income-tax (Sixteenth Amendment) Rules, 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Board of Direct Taxes notified Income-tax (Sixteenth Amendment) Rules, 2022 in order to amend Income-tax Rules, 1962. The amendment introduces a Rule 44FA dealing with the form and manner of filing appeal to the High Court under section 245W (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CBDT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/01\/telangana-state-authority-advanceruling-cgst-investigation-post-filing-application-not-debar-seekingadvanceruling-telanganahighcourt-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":3},"title":"Whether investigation post filing of an application for advance ruling would debar the applicant from seeking advance ruling? Telangana High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Telangana High Court: While allowing the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the impugned order dated 03-06-2022 passed by Telangana State Authority for Advance Ruling (\u2018Authority') and to consider the application for advance ruling under Section 98 of the Central Goods\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/15\/bom-hc-appellate-authority-for-gst-has-jurisdiction-to-advert-to-new-grounds-in-support-of-its-decision-that-were-not-raised-before-the-advance-ruling-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Appellate Authority for GST has jurisdiction to advert to ‘new grounds’ in support of its decision, that were not raised before the Advance Ruling Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of M.S. Sanklecha and M.S. Sonak, JJ. while allowing the petition filed against the order of the Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Service Tax (\"Appellate Authority\") constituted under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, observed that the Appellate Authority\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/26\/free-issue-material-and-valuation-under-tax-a-never-ending-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":236590,"position":5},"title":"Free Issue Material and Valuation under Tax: A Never Ending Dispute","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Asish Philip Abraham* and Apeksha Bansal** Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 21","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Valuation under Tax","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tax-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tax-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tax-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tax-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236590\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/218562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}