{"id":236429,"date":"2020-09-29T10:45:36","date_gmt":"2020-09-29T05:15:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236429"},"modified":"2020-10-09T11:43:11","modified_gmt":"2020-10-09T06:13:11","slug":"sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: <\/strong>A Full Bench of Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, and S. Thurairaja, PC, JJ., allowed an application for special leave to appeal filed aggrieved by the order of the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant-respondent-petitioner (workman) was employed as the Farm Manager of the respondent-appellant-respondent Company (employer). He had filed an application in the Labour Tribunal claiming compensation for the alleged unlawful termination of services and gratuity from the employer. The employer had stated that the termination was due to \u2018frustration\u2019 of the contract of employment as the farm in which the employer worked was closed down as it was not feasible to continue with its operations. After inquiry the Labour Tribunal had ordered compensation to the workman for the wrongful termination of employment. Being aggrieved, the employer had appealed the High Court where the appeal was allowed and order of the Labour Tribunal was set aside. Thus, the current appeal was filed by the workman. The Counsel for the employer, Viran Corea with Sarita de Fonseka had raised a Preliminary Objection stating that the workman had not complied with Rule 2 read with Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules of 1990 and moved for a dismissal of the application <em>in limine<\/em>. They further contended that workman had filed, by way of motion several documents without assigning any reason for the delay and\/or inability to have tendered the said documents along with the petition. Per Contra, the counsel for the workman, Ms. Kaushali Rubasinghe with Mr. Kushani Harischandra, submitted that in terms of Rule 2 read with Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, documents have to be annexed where the application contains allegations of fact which cannot be verified by reference to the judgment or Order in respect of which special leave to appeal is sought. It was submitted that no prejudice had been caused to the rights of the employer or the administration of justice due to the non-availability of those documents. Further, they contended that the application was taken up for support for the first time; no objection was raised on the maintainability of the application. However, the objection regarding non-compliance was raised only when the matter was taken up for support for the second time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while explaining Rule 2 read with Rule 6 specified that documents that are required to be annexed to an application for special leave to appeal, if allegations of facts referred to in such an application cannot be verified by reference to the judgment in respect of which special leave to appeal is sought. The Court further held that there was no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal. Hence, the statement of objections and the verifying affidavit filed by the workman before the High Court are not necessary to consider the instant application thus; said documents are not material documents to consider granting of special leave to appeal in the instant application. Preliminary Objection raised by the employer was overruled imposing costs.[Hiranya Surantha Wijesinghe v. Tenderlea Farms (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/331ne6e7\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine SL SC 7<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-09-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><span class=\"search-everything-highlight-color\">Suchita<\/span>\u00a0Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[8991,31857,34889,14651,36515,3279],"class_list":["post-236429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-appeal","tag-employer","tag-labour-tribunal","tag-preliminary-objection","tag-special-leave","tag-workman"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-\u2502-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-\u2502-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-29T05:15:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-09T06:13:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-29T05:15:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-09T06:13:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-\u2502-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0","og_description":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-\u2502-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-29T05:15:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-09T06:13:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/","name":"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2020-09-29T05:15:36+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-09T06:13:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/29\/sl-sc-%e2%94%82-preliminary-objection-overruled-no-provision-requiring-the-filing-of-objections-in-an-appeal-court-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL SC | Preliminary objection overruled, no provision requiring the filing of objections in an appeal; Court allows appeal \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":236801,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/06\/sl-sc-s-31-b-5-of-industrial-disputes-act-does-not-debar-from-maintaining-application-to-labour-tribunal-against-termination-of-services-and-to-file-fundamental-rights-application-to-sc-simu\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":0},"title":"SL SC | S. 31 B (5) of Industrial Disputes Act does not debar from maintaining application to\u00a0Labour Tribunal against termination of services and to file fundamental rights application to SC simultaneously","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, CJ and Murdu N.B. Fernando and S. Thurairaja, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed being aggrieved by the order of the High Court in a matter of violation of fundamental rights alleging unlawful\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223642,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/sl-sc-termination-of-employee-justified-where-he-did-not-act-with-full-honesty-court-allows-appeal-by-employer\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":1},"title":"SL SC | Termination of employee justified where he did not act with full honesty; Court allows appeal by employer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira J. de Abrew, Murdu N.B. Fernando and S. Thurairaja, JJ., allowed an appeal filed in terms of Article 154(P) of the Constitution read with Section 31-DD of the Industrial Disputes Act (as amended) and Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/if-labour-court-orders-reinstatement-and-employer-challenges-the-said-order-is-workman-entitled-to-payment-of-full-wages-during-the-pendency-of-challenge\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":2},"title":"If Labour Court orders reinstatement and employer challenges the said order, is workman entitled to payment of full wages during pendency of challenge by employer? Del HC explains in consonance of Industrial Disputes Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., decided a matter with regard to payment of full wages to workman while proceedings are pending pertaining to him in the Court. Respondent 1 \u2013 workman moved the application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/17\/calcutta-high-court-directs-immediate-reinstatement-with-consequential-benefits-based-on-nature-of-employment-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Nature of Employment to be judged on the basis of duties performed, not Employer\u2019s Letter\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs reinstatement","author":"Ritu","date":"February 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere the job continues without even any performance appraisal or periodical renewal, and the person engaged in the same would be termed as a \u201ctrainee\u201d, as it is in the present case, the same would be considered as unfair labour practice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/25\/sl-sc-there-is-a-duty-both-to-the-bank-to-preserve-its-fair-name-and-to-the-customer-whose-money-lies-in-deposits-termination-upheld-on-the-grounds-of-misconduct\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":4},"title":"SL SC | \u2018There is a duty, both to the bank to preserve its fair name and customer whose money lies in deposits\u2019; Termination upheld on grounds of misconduct","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Sisira De Abrew, Prasanna Jayawardena and S. Thurairaja, JJ. entertained the instant appeal filed against the order of\u00a0 Provincial High Court, where the judgment passed by the Labor Tribunal was reversed. The factual matrix of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/utt-hc-labour-court-is-not-free-to-widen-scope-of-reference-made-to-it-reinstated-workman-given-the-status-of-trainee-and-not-regular-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":236429,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Labour Court is not free to widen scope of reference made to it; Reinstated workman given the status of trainee and not regular employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated the writ petition where the petitioner raised questions related to the order of the Labor Court passed in 2014. The brief facts as involved in the instant writ petition were that the petitioner in the capacity of being an employer as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236429\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}