{"id":236286,"date":"2020-09-25T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2020-09-25T08:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=236286"},"modified":"2020-10-02T13:08:52","modified_gmt":"2020-10-02T07:38:52","slug":"pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong> In a petition challenging the legality of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014, Sanjay Karol, CJ., and S. Kumar, J., dismissed the petition for lack of merit upholding their validity.<\/p>\n

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relief in the form of a declaration that the aforementioned rules are ultra vires and in contravention of the Supreme Court\u2019s Mandate which has held that a maximum weightage of 15 % can be extended to those who have prior work experience of working on a contract basis. However, under the Dentist Service Rules, 2014 25 % weightage has been allocated for candidates with prior work experience.<\/p>\n

The present matter arises from the recruitment on 617 posts created by the Health Department, Government of Bihar for appointment in Primary Health Centres, Sub-Divisional Referal Hospitals and Medical College Hospitals out of which 488 were for dentists, 73 for Junior Staffs surgeons (Dental), 55 for Surgeon (Dental) and 1 of Joint Director Dental Services.<\/p>\n

The Government of Bihar framed the Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014 to regulate appointment and service conditions in the dentist service and notified the same on 14-10-2014. Under Rule 6 it has been mentioned that dentists may be employed on a contractual basis for a limited period in situations where dentists fit for appointments are not available. Under rule 7 the procedure for recruitment in Bihar Dentist Service is prescribed under which 5 marks per year maximum 25 marks can be awarded for experience in Government Hospitals.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner, Kundan Kumar cited the judgment of Rajasthan High Court in Archana v. State of Rajasthan<\/em>, 2013 SCC OnLine Raj 2759<\/a>, <\/b>but the Court doubted its applicability in facts and circumstances of the present case.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondent, Paag-Lalit Kishore submitted that the contention raised by the petitioner has already been settled in an earlier judgment of this Court in Dharamvir Kumar v. State of Bihar<\/em>, C.W.J.C. No. 855 of 2015. The relevant paragraph from the judgment has been reproduced below-<\/p>\n

\u201cBasically, it is for the recruiting agency to stipulate the procedure for selecting the candidates. It is only when the procedure is found to be patently illegal, that the Court would interfere. For selecting candidates, written test can certainly be treated as a good method, but there is nothing in law which mandates that written test is the only method to select the candidates. Awarding of marks for experience is not uncommon. The candidates who have been engaged on contractual basis served the Government Hospitals at a time when their other colleagues have been pursuing their green pastures. The State can certainly recognize the service of such candidates, subject, of course, to certain limits. The judgment of the Supreme Court relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners, apart from not supporting the contention, approves the procedure of awarding marks for experience in the Government Hospitals.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court then relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Meeta Sahay v. State of Bihar<\/em> which dealt with a similar question of law with respect to awarding weightage for experience in appointment in Medical Service. The Supreme Court approved the same and made way for appointments being made by awarding weightage to select candidates.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court after careful perusal of the facts, circumstances, authority cited and arguments advanced, dismissed the petition as it lacked merit.[Shailesh Chandra Gupta v. State of Bihar, 2020 SCC OnLine Pat 1274<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-08-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: In a petition challenging the legality of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014, Sanjay Karol, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43570],"class_list":["post-236286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bihar-dentist-service-rules"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: In a petition challenging the legality of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014, Sanjay Karol,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-25T08:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-02T07:38:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-25T08:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-02T07:38:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same","og_description":"Patna High Court: In a petition challenging the legality of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014, Sanjay Karol,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-25T08:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-02T07:38:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/","name":"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-09-25T08:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-02T07:38:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/pat-hc-court-upholds-validity-of-rule-72aiii-and-72biii-of-bihar-dentist-service-rules-2014-dismisses-petition-challenging-the-same\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Court upholds validity of Rule 7(2)(A)(iii) and 7(2)(B)(iii) of Bihar Dentist Service Rules, 2014; dismisses petition challenging the same"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/pat-hc-writ-not-to-be-accorded-by-court-on-basis-of-hypothetical-situation-or-probability-as-canvassed-by-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Writ not to be accorded by Court on basis of hypothetical situation or probability as canvassed by petitioner","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Mohit Kumar Shah, J. entertained a writ petition which sought relief against Bihar Public Service Commission to re-advertise by the way of corrigendum for the post of Dental Doctor and to be allowed to participate in the selection process. The petitioner prayed for declaring the advertisement of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/28\/pat-hc-panchayat-elections-acceptance-of-affidavit-of-assets-and-liabilities-without-objection-raises-presumption-of-fact-regarding-validity-of-nomination-of-elected-candidate\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Acceptance of affidavit of assets and liabilities \u2013 raises presumption of validity of elected candidate\u2019s nomination","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Anjana Mishra, J. dismissed an appeal challenging election of a village mukhiya. Appellant herein had filed an election petition assailing the election of Respondent 3 as mukhiya of a village on the ground of non-disclosure of his assets\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/candidate-scoring-minimum-qualifying-marks-no-work-experience-still-eligible-appointed-city-manager-under-udhd-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":2},"title":"Candidate scoring minimum qualifying marks with no work experience will still be eligible to be appointed as City Manager under UDHD: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe only criteria for minimum qualifying marks have been mentioned in the Bihar City Manager Cadre (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2014 and the advertisement, which states that 32 % for women is the minimum qualifying marks for the written test (70 marks) and not out of 100 marks as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"City Manager under UDHD","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/City-Manager-under-UDHD.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/City-Manager-under-UDHD.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/City-Manager-under-UDHD.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/City-Manager-under-UDHD.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/pat-hc-court-while-exercising-jurisdiction-of-judicial-review-cannot-examine-sufficiency-of-reasons-for-satisfaction-of-competent-authority-in-initiating-disciplinary-proceedings-against-delin\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Court while exercising jurisdiction of judicial review, cannot examine sufficiency of reasons for satisfaction of competent authority in initiating disciplinary proceedings against\u00a0delinquent employees","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ of certiorari, Birendra Kumar, J., dismissed the same finding no reason warranting interference. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner who pleads for the quashing of the order contained in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323950,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/10\/states-policy-granting-grace-marks-to-contractual-teacher-and-not-to-guest-teacher-is-violative-of-art-14-patnahc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":4},"title":"[BPSC Recruitment] State\u2019s policy granting grace marks to contractual teacher and not to guest teacher is violative of Art. 14: Patna High Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that both the contract teachers and the guest teachers are discharging same duties as they are teaching students in schools and thus, there is no difference between the contract teachers and the guest teachers.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6400,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/14\/conflict-of-interest-petition-against-n-srinivasan-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":236286,"position":5},"title":"Conflict of Interest Petition against N. Srinivasan dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a recent order, a bench comprising of Anoop Mohta and NM Jamdar, JJ dismissed a PIL filed by the Cricket Association of Bihar, challenging the two amendments carried out by the Board of Control for Cricket for India, in its rules and regulations which they claimed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}