{"id":235931,"date":"2020-09-18T11:34:58","date_gmt":"2020-09-18T06:04:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235931"},"modified":"2020-09-25T00:19:44","modified_gmt":"2020-09-24T18:49:44","slug":"hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> Ajay Mohan Goel J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that the petitioner worked as a Senior Assistant in Government Senior Secondary School, Hatwar whose headmaster lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner had withdrawn an amount of Rs 1,60,000 and Rs 1,00,000 from the GPF account of Smt. Shakuntala Devi and Rs 60,000 from the GPF account of Smt. Pushp Lata fraudulently and in an unauthorized manner without any request being made for such withdrawal by the account holders. Subsequent to the complaint, the petitioner was called for show cause to which no response was made reason for which was ill-health as submitted later. The Director of Higher Education, H.P., ordered that Rs 1,60,000 plus interest be recovered from the petitioner by way of attachment of his 1\/3rd salary per month and the same be paid under proper receipt every month in equal amount both to Shakuntala Devi and Pushp Lata till the recovery of their respective embezzled amount with interest of 3% over and above the prevailing rate of interest on GPF, vide order dated 25-11-2014. Aggrieved by the same the instant petition was filed to quash the order and stop the recovery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner Vijay Bhatia submitted that the act of the petitioner was bonafide as the GPF payments were released on a request made by the employees concerned. It was further submitted that no proceedings were initiated in consonance with the provisions of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and therefore the impugned order is bad in law and not sustainable whereas the respondents were represented by counsels Somesh Raj, Dinesh Thakur, Sanjeev Sood and Varun Chandel who opposed the submissions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court after hearing the facts and submissions in the instant case observed that neither any record has been placed which proves that the withdrawn amount were handed over to the employees concerned nor both the employees have been made party in the petition. The Court further observed that the entire reason for delay being given as ill health is just a concocted story and it is imprudent to agree with the excuse as the petitioner could have asked for an extension instead of remaining silent till the time impugned order was passed. In view of the observations given, it was held that choosing to remain silent to the show cause results in impliedly agreeing to the allegations. The Court further held that argument regarding provisions of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 holds no merit as the provisions are attracted in a disciplinary proceeding against a delinquent employee which is not the case in the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the Court rejected the prayer for quashing the impugned order and disposed of the petition. [Rajesh Kumar v. State of H.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/azu109Ze\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 1563<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-08-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><span class=\"search-everything-highlight-color\">Arunima<\/span>\u00a0Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2992,9351,2666,29785,30629],"class_list":["post-235931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-allegation","tag-disciplinary-proceeding","tag-employees","tag-law","tag-show-cause"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-\u2502-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-\u2502-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-18T06:04:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-24T18:49:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-18T06:04:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-24T18:49:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-\u2502-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-\u2502-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-18T06:04:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-24T18:49:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/","name":"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-09-18T06:04:58+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-24T18:49:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-without-reasonable-delay-to-be-considered-as-allegation-impliedly-admitted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Failure to reply to show cause without reasonable delay to be considered as allegation impliedly admitted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/long-term-capital-gains-exempted-from-income-tax-non-disclosure-will-not-cause-prejudice-to-revenue-gauhc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":0},"title":"Long term capital gains exempted from income tax; non-disclosure will not cause prejudice to interest of revenue or loss of revenue: Gauhati HC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The twin conditions, i.e., firstly, the order being erroneous and secondly, the order being prejudicial to the interest of revenue, must exist before power under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is exercised.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gauhati High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/20\/truck-capital-asset-transporter-generating-income-seizure-without-show-cause-notice-violates-civil-rights-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":1},"title":"Truck is a capital asset of transporter utilised for generating income, seizure without show cause notice violates civil rights: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"January 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court noted that the penalty order does not appear to bring out any conduct of the petitioner as may indicate or establish collusion between the petitioner and the importing dealer.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262982,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/03\/to-prove-that-cheque-amount-was-larger-than-debt-due-can-defence-of-issuer-be-looked-at-stage-of-issuing-summons\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":2},"title":"To prove that cheque amount was larger than debt due, can defence of Issuer be looked at stage of issuing summons? Del HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter revolving around Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Subramonium Prasad, J., held that Courts should primarily proceed on the averments in the complaint, and the defence of the accused cannot be looked at the stage of issuing summons unless it can\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/07\/rape-allegation\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":3},"title":"P&#038;H HC | It is not only an abuse to process of law but also an attempt to overawe the authorities; HC imposes cost of 1 lakh for fake rape allegation\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana Case: Harnaresh Singh Gill, J., dismissed the instant petition filed for issuance of directions to Police officials to hand over the investigation of her case under Section 376 Penal Code, 1860, to the Central Bureau of Investigation or to some other independent agency. The Bench stated, \u201c\u2026it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C. relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1)(A), (F),(H),(I),(L) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 i.e. CGST\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":148861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/forgiveness-sought-for-offence-under-ss-195-and-211-ipc-no-ground-for-quashing-the-complaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":235931,"position":5},"title":"Forgiveness sought for offence under Ss. 195 and 211 IPC no ground for quashing the complaint","author":"Saba","date":"August 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Court recently dealt with a petition under Section 482 CrPC praying for quashing of complaint against petitioner under Sections 195 and 211 IPC that is, for fabricating false evidence and false charge of offence with an intent to injure, respectively. In a case titled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235931\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}