{"id":235683,"date":"2020-09-12T16:11:38","date_gmt":"2020-09-12T10:41:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235683"},"modified":"2021-05-16T19:22:46","modified_gmt":"2021-05-16T13:52:46","slug":"unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Much like sovereign democracy, corporate democracy plays to the will of the majority. The majority rule enforces a contractual bargain among shareholders that puts collective decision-making ahead of individual interests. By placing business decisions in the hands of the Board of Directors, it introduces an element of efficiency. However, what is to prevent a tyranny of the majority that steamrolls minority shareholders? Here, company law intervenes to moderate the behaviour of dominant shareholders to ensure they do not adversely affect the interests of the minority. Minority shareholders can resort to various remedies under company law, such as oppression, prejudice and mismanagement, to restore the balance of power.<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-235714 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"363\" height=\"242\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-300x200.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-440x293.jpeg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-650x433.jpeg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-886x590.jpeg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30-60x40.jpeg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/photo_2020-09-12-15.38.30.jpeg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 363px) 100vw, 363px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While Indian company law has incorporated versions of shareholder remedies since the mid-20th century, the design of the remedies as they currently operate finds place in Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (\u201cthe 2013 Act\u201d). No sooner than these provisions took effect,<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[1]<\/a> they faced a litmus test in one of India\u2019s fiercest corporate battles in recent times. On 24-10-2016, the Board of Tata Sons Ltd., the holding company of the revered Tata group of companies, ousted its Executive Chairman, Mr Cyrus Mistry, from the position. The Shapoorji Pallonji group, of which Mr Mistry is a part, is a minority shareholder in Tata Sons. The group promptly initiated action under Sections 241 and 242 of the 2013 Act against Tata Sons and its controlling shareholders, being two Tata trusts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Shapoorji Pallonji group challenged various decisions taken by Tata Sons. These included several business decisions taken in various Tata group companies (referred to as \u201clegacy issues\u201d), the amendments to the articles of association of the holding company Tata Sons to enhance the powers of the Tata shareholders and ultimately the removal of Mr Mistry as the Executive Chairman and thereafter as a Director of Tata Sons. While the dispute was pending adjudication, Tata Sons converted itself from a public company into a private one, a matter also contested legally. After marathon hearings, the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (\u201cNCLT\u201d) issued a 368-page ruling<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[2]<\/a> declining to grant any relief to the minority shareholders.<\/p>\n<p>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/49eSs012\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more<\/a>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u2020\u00a0 Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. I would like to thank Souryaditya Sen for research assistance. Errors or omissions remain mine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>** This Article was first published in Supreme Court Cases.<b>\u00a0<\/b>It has been reproduced with the kind permission of Eastern Book Company<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\"><\/a><a href=\"#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>\u00a0 Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, Notification S.O. 1934(E) dated 1-6-2016 (being also the effective date).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Umakanth Varottil\u2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":235718,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1191,42504],"tags":[31142,43440,43442,43441,22014,12521,36081,31016,7721],"class_list":["post-235683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-op-ed","category-scc-journal-section","tag-business","tag-companies-act-2103","tag-contractual-bargain","tag-mismanagement","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-shareholders","tag-tata-sons","tag-winding-up"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives] | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Umakanth Varottil\u2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-12T10:41:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-16T13:52:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/\",\"name\":\"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives] | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-12T10:41:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-16T13:52:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives]\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives] | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives]","og_description":"by Umakanth Varottil\u2020","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-12T10:41:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-16T13:52:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/","name":"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives] | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-09-12T10:41:38+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-16T13:52:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/12\/unpacking-the-scope-of-oppression-prejudice-and-mismanagement-under-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Unpacking the scope of oppression, prejudice and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 [SCC Archives]"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/companies-act-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/power-of-winding-up-at-the-suit-of-minority-shareholders\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":0},"title":"Power of Winding Up at the Suit of Minority Shareholders","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ira Srivastava*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Power of Winding Up","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Power-of-Winding-Up.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Power-of-Winding-Up.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Power-of-Winding-Up.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Power-of-Winding-Up.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/protection-of-minority-shareholder-rights-nclt-lays-down-a-structured-buy-out-mechanism-to-resolve-deadlock-between-shareholders-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":1},"title":"Protection of minority shareholder rights | NCLT lays down structured buy-out mechanism to resolve deadlock between shareholders","author":"Ritu","date":"March 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLT gave the first right to buy shares to the petitioners and then the Deccan Group. If neither party purchased the other\u2019s shares, the NCLT would consider winding up the company under Section 242(1)(b) of the Companies Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/23\/just-and-equitable-clause-for-winding-up-of-the-companies-in-matters-of-oppression-and-mismanagement\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":2},"title":"Just and Equitable Clause for Winding Up of the Companies in Matters of Oppression and Mismanagement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Saloni Bung\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-286.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-286.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-286.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-286.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-286.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/07\/action-against-oppression-and-mismanagement\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":3},"title":"Action Against Oppression and Mismanagement \u2013 An Effective Tool","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aditya Vikram Jalan\u2020 \u00a0and Urvashi Misra\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281217,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/to-compel-or-not-compel-moving-the-debate-of-mandatory-shareholder-arbitration-to-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":4},"title":"To Compel or not Compel, Moving the Debate of Mandatory Shareholder Arbitration to India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tushar Behl\u2020 and Shreshtha Garge\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":248255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/tata-v-mistry-a-case-for-greater-protection-of-minority-shareholders-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":235683,"position":5},"title":"Tata v. Mistry: A Case for Greater Protection of Minority Shareholders\u2019 Rights","author":"Editor","date":"May 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Varghese George Thekkel\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235683\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/235718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}