{"id":235444,"date":"2020-09-07T18:21:51","date_gmt":"2020-09-07T12:51:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235444"},"modified":"2020-09-11T10:27:09","modified_gmt":"2020-09-11T04:57:09","slug":"all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b)  Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., addressed a matter with regard to stamp duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondents invited a tender to repair different roads in District Mathura. Petitioner\u2019s tender was accepted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">Stamp Act<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the respondent issued a letter of acceptance with a clause that total security along with stamp duty should be deposited within 10 days. Petitioner wrote to the respondents that he is supposed to pay stamp duty as per Article 57(b) Schedule 1 B of the Stamp Act and for a period of 8 months, no work order was passed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench on perusal of the facts and circumstances of the present matter stated that it is covered by the decision of this Court and further waste of time would cause loss to the public and Exchequer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Despite the previous decisions in <em>Strong Construction v. State of U.P., <\/em>Civil Misc. WP No. 35096 of 2004 and <em>Kishan Traders v. State of U.P., <\/em>Writ C No. 52385 of 2015, authorities have demanded from petitioner what is known as stamp duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Court added that though the petition is belated, this Court has not been made aware whether the contract has already been executed or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to the stamp duty, Court stated that it has been covered by the Division Bench of this Court in <em>Kishan Traders v. State of U.P.,<\/em> Writ C No. 52385 of 2015, wherein Writ of Mandamus was issued which read as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;We also issue a Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to compel the Petitioners and similarly situate persons, whether they have filed writ petition or not, to pay Stamp Duty on security deposit in question treating as &#8216;mortgage deed&#8217; and further to charge Stamp Duty on such &#8216;securities&#8217; as provided under Article 57 (b) Schedule 1 B of the Stamp Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence in view of the above, bench held that the petitioner would be liable to pay stamp duty as per Article 57(b) Schedule 1 B of the Stamp Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the petition was allowed. [Yogendra Kumar v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7hJr2zpp\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine All 1024<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-09-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., addressed a matter with regard to stamp duty. Respondents invited a tender to repair <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3174,43386,14511,5951,9321,14591],"class_list":["post-235444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-contract","tag-letter-of-acceptance","tag-stamp-act","tag-stamp-duty","tag-tender","tag-writ-of-mandamus"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., addressed a matter with regard to stamp duty. Respondents invited a tender to repair\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-07T12:51:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-11T04:57:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/\",\"name\":\"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-07T12:51:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-11T04:57:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., addressed a matter with regard to stamp duty. Respondents invited a tender to repair","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-07T12:51:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-11T04:57:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/","name":"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-09-07T12:51:51+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-11T04:57:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/all-hc-reiterates-that-authorities-not-to-demand-stamp-duty-beyond-art-57b-sch-1-b-of-stamp-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC reiterates that Authorities not to demand Stamp Duty beyond Art. 57(b) Sch. 1-B of Stamp Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/unstamped-arbitration-agreement-bombay-high-court-fixes-deficiency-of-stamp-duty-and-penalty\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":0},"title":"[Unstamped Arbitration Agreement] Bombay High Court fixes deficiency of stamp duty and penalty","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bombay High Court explained that if it was to consider the instant application under Section 11 of A&C Act, it would have to work on the deficiency of stamp duty and penalty, if any.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/stamp-duty-assessment-dispute-leaves-no-room-for-third-party-intervention-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":1},"title":"Stamp Duty assessment dispute leaves no room for third-party intervention: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the Calcutta High Court dismissed an application for addition of the applicant as a party in a writ petition challenging the assessment of stamp duty.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/13\/stamp-duty-correctly-payable-on-instruments-typical-in-redevelopment-projects\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":2},"title":"Stamp Duty correctly payable on instruments typical in Redevelopment Projects: Bom HC to decide","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of G.S. Patel and Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ., considered petitions which raised questions about the interpretation of the validity of two circulars issued by the Inspector General of Registration and Controller of Stamps, Maharashtra State dated 23-06-2015 and 30-03-2017. It was stated that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/22\/bom-hc-exercises-extraordinary-jurisdiction-to-stamp-duty-refund-on-unexecuted-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC: Extraordinary jurisdiction can be invoked to order stamp duty refund on unexecuted agreement despite Section 48 limitation under Maharashtra Stamp Act","author":"Sunaina","date":"December 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe stamp duty is not a transaction tax, but a duty payable on an instrument, which must be executed to be chargeable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stamp duty refund on unexecuted agreement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/stamp-duty-refund-on-unexecuted-agreement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/stamp-duty-refund-on-unexecuted-agreement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/stamp-duty-refund-on-unexecuted-agreement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/stamp-duty-refund-on-unexecuted-agreement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/bom-hc-stamp-duty-cannot-be-avoided-on-arbitration-agreement-even-if-the-rest-of-the-contract-is-executed-outside-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Stamp duty cannot be avoided on arbitration agreement, even if the rest of the contract is executed outside state","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0G.S.Patel, J., held that an arbitration agreement must be stamped in the state where the arbitration is to take place, even if the only \"thing to be done\" in the state is the arbitration of the dispute. In this particular case, the contract was executed outside the state\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/26\/maharashtra-stamp-act-stamp-duty-chargeable-principal-document-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":235444,"position":5},"title":"Maharashtra Stamp Act| Principal document alone chargeable with Stamp Duty in case of transaction with multiple documents: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also clarified that to determine the stamp duty that is chargeable upon an instrument, the legal rule is that the real and true meaning of the instrument is to be determined by ascertaining the intention of the parties from the contents and the language employed in the whole\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Maharashtra Stamp Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}