{"id":235383,"date":"2020-09-05T15:14:35","date_gmt":"2020-09-05T09:44:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235383"},"modified":"2020-09-05T15:30:15","modified_gmt":"2020-09-05T10:00:15","slug":"madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that,<\/p>\n

“The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Petitioners Counsel, N.G.R Prasad and Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent, represented the parties in the present matter.<\/p>\n

Maintainability of Contempt Petition<\/span><\/p>\n

Court’s view in the present matter was that the Court need not venture into rendering its findings on the contentions raised on either side since the very maintainability of the Contempt Petition is in question.<\/p>\n

Final orders were passed in the petition on 06-02-2020, respondent took the matter on appeal in W.A. No. 252 of 2020 and Division Bench dealt with the case on merits and partly allowed the Writ Appeal.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Once an order has been passed in the Writ Appeal and the order passed by the Single Judge is modified and the Writ Appeal is partly allowed, the order of the Single Judge merges with the order passed in the Writ Appeal. <\/span><\/p>\n

The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Reference to the Supreme Court decisions in Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala<\/em>, (2000) 6 SCC 359<\/a> and <\/span>Shanthi v. T.D. Vishwanathan<\/em>, (2019) 11 SCC 419<\/a>, was made.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bench in view of the above decisions held that the contempt petition filed before the Single judge is not maintainable since the order of the Single judge has merged with the order passed by the Division Bench in the writ appeal.<\/p>\n

Adding to the above, Court also stated that if the petitioner feels that the order has been violated or disobeyed, a Contempt Petition can be maintained only before the Division Bench and not before the Single Judge.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hence, the Contempt Petition was closed.[All India Union Bank Officer v. Brajeshwar Sharma, Contempt Petition No. 570 of 2020, decided on 31-08-2020]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, “The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30393,32248,43372,11801,29785,43373,43371,43374],"class_list":["post-235383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-contempt-petition","tag-division-bench","tag-doctrine-of-merger","tag-high-court","tag-law","tag-madras","tag-single-judge","tag-writ-appeal"],"yoast_head":"\nMadras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, “The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-05T09:44:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-05T10:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-05T09:44:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-05T10:00:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition","og_description":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, “The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-05T09:44:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-05T10:00:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","name":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-09-05T09:44:35+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-05T10:00:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/mad-hc-directs-compliance-with-deepathoon-lighting-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":0},"title":"Contempt jurisdiction unaffected by merger doctrine: Madras HC directs compliance with Deepathoon lighting orders","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBefore law all are one and no one can claim immunity merely because they happen to hold high offices.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Deepathoon lighting orders","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/dismissal-of-slp-by-reasoned-order-would-not-attract-doctrine-of-merger-but-will-be-binding-on-all-courts-tribunals-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":1},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by reasoned order would not attract doctrine of merger but will be binding on all courts\/tribunals in India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the doctrine of merger in case of dismissal of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that doctrine of merger would not attract and that it doesn\u2019t matter if the SLP has been dismissed by a non-speaking order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/25\/rss-route-march-madras-high-court-single-judge-cannot-modify-order-passed-in-writ-petition-while-exercising-jurisdiction-to-punish-respondents-under-a-contempt-petition-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":2},"title":"[RSS Route-March] Madras High Court: Single Judge cannot modify order passed in writ petition, while exercising jurisdiction under a contempt petition","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that that the order passed in writ petition had been fundamentally modified by the order passed in the contempt petition, the effect of which resulted in a veiled attempt to sit in judgment\/appeal over the order passed in the writ petition, which is not permissible in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/06\/the-doctrine-of-merger\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":3},"title":"The Doctrine of Merger","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vilas Govindan Pavithran\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/merger-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/merger-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/merger-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/merger-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/merger-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/madras-high-court-dismisses-contempt-proceedings-against-presiding-officer-of-family-court-imposes-rs-50000-costs-on-the-petitioner-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court dismisses contempt proceedings against presiding officer of family Court; Imposes Rs. 50,000 costs on the petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that the contempt petition is not maintainable and barred by limitation. Thus, dismissed contempt proceedings against the presiding officer of Family Court as he was not the presiding officer when the order was passed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":211662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/jk-hc-stay-application-rejected-considering-that-applicant-already-filed-independent-motion-in-contempt-petition-for-deferment-of-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":235383,"position":5},"title":"J&K HC | Stay application rejected considering that applicant already filed independent motion in contempt petition for deferment of\u00a0 proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Tashi Rabstan, J., dismissed the application filed for seeking stay of contempt proceedings pending in the contempt petition on the ground that the applicants\/respondents had already filed a review petition for review of judgment\/order, implementation of which was sought by the writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}