{"id":235358,"date":"2020-09-05T12:30:28","date_gmt":"2020-09-05T07:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235358"},"modified":"2020-09-05T11:22:40","modified_gmt":"2020-09-05T05:52:40","slug":"ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Orissa High Court: <\/strong>S.K. Panigrahi J., granted bail on grounds of non-service of notice on the accused which is violative of the most cardinal principle of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that while the informant in the instant case along with his staff was on patrolling duty they detained the accused on suspicion and discovered eleven polythene packets containing 270kg 200gms of Ganja. They were charged under Section 20(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act and subsequently arrested. The Petitioner along with other accused persons were forwarded to the Court of Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Koraput, Jeypore who directed S.I. Sima Pradhan of Jeypore Sadar P.S to commence investigation. An application for extension of the submission of charge sheet was filed which was subsequently granted through ex parte proceedings without issuing notice to the accused persons. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition for grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC, 1973 has been preferred before the court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner Jyotirmaya Sahoo and S.K Pattnaik submitted that the court has erred in passing the ex parte order which is in violation of Section 36 A(4) of the N.D.P.S. Act which mandates that an opportunity of hearing must be given to the accused before granting an extension for a further period of 60 days for completing the investigation. Due to this violation, the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent Tapas Kumar Praharaj submitted that the Petitioner is a resident outside the state hence there are higher chances of fleeing from justice and considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the Petitioner ought not be released on bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Seeking extension for default in filing of chargesheet vis-\u00e0-vis grant of bail <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NLKo6KK5\">(1996) 1 SCC 718<\/a>; <em>Pappu Ram v. State of Rajasthan<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y9zwIkWU\">2017 SCC Online Raj 3418<\/a>;\u00a0 <em>Arvind Kumar Saxena v. State<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Dd6p8z2V\">2018 SCC Online Del 7769<\/a> and <em>Venkatesh v. State,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Dd6p8z2V\">2019 SCC OnLine Mad 995<\/a> it was clarified that although a default in filing the chargesheet would confer an indefeasible right of the accused to be admitted to bail. However, if an accused fails to exercise his right to be released on bail for the failure of the prosecution to file the charge-sheet within the maximum time allowed by law, he cannot contend that he had an indefeasible right to exercise it at any time notwithstanding the fact that in the meantime the charge-sheet has been filed. On the other hand, if he exercises the right within the time allowed by law and is released on bail under such circumstances, he cannot be rearrested on the mere filing of the charge-sheet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Non-issuance of notice to the accused at the stage of hearing the application for extension of time<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Pradip Maity v. Union of India,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h47qa3vr\">2010 SCC OnLine Cal 1503<\/a> it was held that before the grant of extension of time, notice should be issued to the accused so that he may have an opportunity to oppose the extension which is sine qua non for seeking extension under section 36A(4) of the N.D.P.S Act. Any sort of violation thereof would entitle the benefit to the accused to get enlarged on bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Rejection of bail application by Special Judge<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Union of India v. Thamisharasi <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/21Cjwh3E\">(1995) 4 SCC 190<\/a> it was held that the only fact material to attract the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 is the default in filing the charge sheet within the maximum period specified therein to permit custody during investigation and not the merits of the case which till the filing of the complaint are not before the court to determine the existence of reasonable grounds for forming the belief about the guilt of the accused. The reasoning behind such a view is that till the complaint is filed the accused is supplied no material from which he can discharge the burden placed on him under Section 37(1)(<em>b<\/em>) of the NDPS Act. It is held that such a construction of clause (<em>b<\/em>) of sub-section (1) of Section 37 is not permissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On hearing the arguments and authoritative pronouncements Court summarized the legal principles on the same, violation of which will accrue the right to bail. These are as follows:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Report of the Public Prosecutor indicating the progress of investigation must accompany the application for extension of time;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\"><em>Specific and compelling reasons <\/em>for seeking detention of the accused beyond 180 days must be mentioned; a merely formal application will not pass muster;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">A notice must mandatorily be issued to the accused and he must be produced in court whenever such an application is taken up,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">An application seeking extension of time in filing of chargesheet by the prosecution ought not to be kept pending and must be decided as expeditiously as possible and certainly before expiry of the statutory period.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">In cases where any such default occurs, the question of it being contested doesn\u2019t arise and a right accrues in favour of the accused.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">The restrictions under Section 37 will have no application in such cases. It will have application only in the case of an application being decided on merits.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Violation of any of the aforesaid would be construed as a \u201cdefault\u201d and the accused become entitled to admitted to bail by such a default.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">When an application under Section 167(2) CrPC r\/w Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act has been filed after expiry of the 180 days period and no decision thereupon, an indefeasible right to be released on bail accrued to the accused which cannot be defeated by keeping the said applications pending<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>The Court held that in case there is a violation of any of the above, an indefeasible right to bail will be accrued to the accused. The Court further applied the aforesaid parameters in the instant case and laid down that there have been such \u201cdefaults\u201d in the instant case, especially non-service of a notice on the accused which is violative of the most cardinal principle of natural justice i.e. <em>Audi Alteram Partem<\/em> which creates an indefeasible entitlement to bail to the petitioner and hence he is enlarged on bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, bail is granted and the petition disposed off.[Ishwar Tiwari v. State of Odisha, BLAPL No.10152 OF 2019; decided on 20-08-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><span class=\"search-everything-highlight-color\">Arunima<\/span>\u00a0Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: S.K. Panigrahi J., granted bail on grounds of non-service of notice on the accused which is violative of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,29785,21061,34763,43357],"class_list":["post-235358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-law","tag-ndps-act","tag-principle-of-natural-justice","tag-special-judge"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: S.K. Panigrahi J., granted bail on grounds of non-service of notice on the accused which is violative of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-05T07:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-05T07:00:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act","og_description":"Orissa High Court: S.K. Panigrahi J., granted bail on grounds of non-service of notice on the accused which is violative of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-05T07:00:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/","name":"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-09-05T07:00:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/ori-hc-default-bail-granted-under-s-1672-crpc-in-case-of-non-compliance-of-notice-under-s-36-a-4-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | \u2018Default Bail\u2019 granted under S. 167(2) CrPC in case of non-compliance of notice under S. 36 A (4) NDPS Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208860,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/28\/tri-hc-why-is-it-so-facile-for-ndps-accused-to-get-bail-dgp-to-submit-report-on-manner-of-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Why is it so facile for NDPS accused to get bail: DGP to submit report on manner of investigation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Appalled at the shocking revelations made in a bail application, the Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ. asked for a detailed tabulated data on the number of people granted bail under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and the reasons for granting such bail. While hearing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/01\/to-declare-section-371bii-of-ndps-act-ultra-vires-constitution-not-in-scope-of-petition-under-section-439-crpc-bail-granted-under-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":1},"title":"To declare Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of NDPS Act ultra vires constitution not in scope of petition under Section 439 CrPC; bail granted under the same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajbir Sehrawat, J., dealt with an application under Section 439 of CrPC. The accused was alleged with carrying psychotropic substance with him and FIR was registered against him under Section 22 of NDPS Act, 1985. After being examined by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258142,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/06\/ndps-act-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":2},"title":"[NDPS Act] P&#038;H HC | FSL report available on record yet Trial Court records it unavailable to grant bail; HC directs disciplinary action against Presiding Officer of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Manoj Bajaj, J., directed for disciplinary action against the Presiding Officer of the Trial Court who had granted bail to one accused in an NDPS case by neglecting the materials on record. The case against the petitioner was that when he was signalled to stop\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/18\/bail-to-applicant-alleged-to-have-committed-offence-under-provisions-of-ndps-act-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":3},"title":"Confessional statements should lead to discovery of \u2018fact&#8217;; Delhi High Court grants bail to the accused under the NDPS Act","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"None of the statements of the applicant led to any discovery of a \u2018fact' in terms of Section 27 of the IEA.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/28\/delhi-high-court-grants-bail-to-a-spanish-national-under-the-ndps-act-as-he-was-denied-the-opportunity-of-a-translator-interpreter\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants bail to a Spanish National under the NDPS Act as he was denied the opportunity of a translator\/interpreter","author":"Editor","date":"December 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court upheld the judgment passed by the Special Judge granting bail to a Spanish National as he was not given the opportunity of a translator or an interpreter and his refusal to get a search conducted before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate was vitiated on account\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":295135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/meghalaya-hc-grants-bail-to-accused-under-ndps-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":235358,"position":5},"title":"Meghalaya HC grants bail to person accused of offence under NDPS Act","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The applicant was arrested in connection with the case registered under Section 21(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}