{"id":235201,"date":"2020-09-02T14:30:10","date_gmt":"2020-09-02T09:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235201"},"modified":"2020-11-27T11:55:45","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T06:25:45","slug":"cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT):<\/strong> A Division Bench of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member), allowed an appeal in order to find out that whether the appellant were liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on their activity of granting license to third party-crane operators for providing their crane (wheel mounted) in the Port area for providing services of loading and unloading, etc. with the help of the crane have collected license fee from the crane operators.<\/p>\n

Appellant being a statutory body, a Port Trust, operating in the major Port at Mangalore are registered with the Service Tax Department. Section 42 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 provides that the Board \u201cPort Trust\u201d shall have the power to undertake services including \u2013 notwithstanding anything contained in this section, Board may, with the sanction of the Central Government authorities engage any person to perform any of the services mentioned in sub-section 1, on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon. It appeared to Revenue that this activity of the appellant- granting of license to operate the crane in the Port area to the licensee, such license fee is chargeable to Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d. Accordingly, SCN was issued invoking the extended period of limitation; penalties were imposed under Sections 78, 76 & 77 read with Rule 7(c). Thus, the instant petition was filed.<\/p>\n

The Counsel for the appellant, Bhanu Murthy put forth the cases of Vishakhapatnam Port Trust v. CCE<\/em>, 2019 (27) GSTL 244 (Tri. Hyd) where it was held that license fee and Royalty received by Port Trust towards licensing others to perform certain functions within port area is not liable to Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d and Cochin Port Trust v. CCE<\/em>, 2011 SCC OnLine CESTAT 4248<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal while allowing the appeal relied on the judgment of Cochin Port Trust<\/em> and held that the matter was no longer res integra and the same had been decided in favour of the assessee in the mentioned case by Kerala High Court quoting that:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe amounts paid by IGTPL to CPT is only in respect of the right conferred on the IGTPL to carry out the port services; for provision of which the users of the port would pay a fee. In such circumstances, definitely the Revenue earned by IGTPL will be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994 specifically under sub-clause (lxxxii) of Section 65. It is a percentage of that, which the IGTPL pays to CPT, in lieu of surrendering their rights to carry out and provide port services in the subject terminals. There is no port service by the CPT to IGTPL. We hence find the order of the Tribunal to be perfectly in order.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

[New Mangalore Port Trust v. C.C.E. & S.T., 2020 SCC OnLine CESTAT 166<\/b><\/a>, decided on 31-08-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita<\/span> Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member), <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[6651,43324,34501,43323,3208,32091],"class_list":["post-235201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cestat","tag-franchise-services","tag-license-fee","tag-major-port-trust","tag-service_tax","tag-statutory-body"],"yoast_head":"\nCESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member),\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-02T09:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-27T06:25:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-02T09:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-27T06:25:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal","og_description":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member),","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-09-02T09:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-27T06:25:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","name":"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2020-09-02T09:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-27T06:25:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/02\/cestat-appellant-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-under-the-head-franchise-services-on-activity-of-granting-license-to-third-party-tribunal-allows-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Appellant not liable to pay Service Tax under the Head \u201cFranchise Services\u201d on activity of granting license to third party; Tribunal allows appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":374207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/30\/service-tax-not-leviable-on-data-hosting-services-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":0},"title":"Service Tax not leviable on data hosting services; Amazon Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. not an ‘intermediary’: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"January 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe place of supply of service being the location of the service recipient, which is outside India, no service tax is leviable\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Service Tax not leviable on data hosting services","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Service-Tax-not-leviable-on-data-hosting-services.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Service-Tax-not-leviable-on-data-hosting-services.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Service-Tax-not-leviable-on-data-hosting-services.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Service-Tax-not-leviable-on-data-hosting-services.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/26\/cestat-%e2%94%82-enterprise-resource-planning-erp-does-not-attract-service-tax-under-the-category-of-management-or-business-consultant-service-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":1},"title":"CESTAT | Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) does not attract service tax under the category of Management or Business Consultant Service; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of S.S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax. The appellants were developer of an internet based trading software \u201cTrade Anywhere\u201d and licensing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366083,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/08\/no-service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks-not-registered-in-india-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":2},"title":"Service tax not payable on use of trade marks not registered under Indian law: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"November 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Intellectual property not registered in India do not constitute \u2018intellectual property rights\u2019 within the meaning of Section 65(55a) of the Finance Act, 1994 and the related services are not 'intellectual property services' within the meaning of Section 65 (55b) of the Finance Act, 1954.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"service tax on use of trade marks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/service-tax-on-use-of-trade-marks.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331032,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/jharkhand-state-cricket-association-renders-bundled-services-related-to-promoting-cricket-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":3},"title":"Jharkhand State Cricket Association renders \u2018bundled services\u2019 related to promoting cricket; not liable to pay service tax for services rendered in connection with sports: CESTAT","author":"Arushi","date":"September 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"All the activities rendered by the appellant are undertaken during hosting the cricket matches alone and if there were no cricket matches played, then all these services become irrelevant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":4},"title":"Transferring tenancy and occupancy rights in immovable property not service under S. 65-B(44) of Finance Act; not liable to service tax: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Consideration out of surrender of tenancy right on account of immovable property cannot be considered as service as per definition under Section 65-B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994 and no service tax is payable.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"transferring tenancy rights not liable to service tax","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/cestat-company-providing-service-to-member-companies-without-consideration-not-liable-to-service-tax-under-business-auxiliary-service-bas\/","url_meta":{"origin":235201,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Company providing service to member companies without consideration not liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS)","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}