{"id":235008,"date":"2020-08-28T16:30:35","date_gmt":"2020-08-28T11:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=235008"},"modified":"2020-09-04T11:53:51","modified_gmt":"2020-09-04T06:23:51","slug":"raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Rent Tribunal which had dismissed an application filed by the petitioner\/non-applicant\/tenant under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.<\/p>\n

The respondent-applicant had filed an Original Application under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 stating therein that the petitioner was the tenant in his flat under a rent agreement. Alleging default in the payment of rent, his eviction was sought by the respondent. The petitioner-tenant had filed the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC which had been dismissed by the Rent Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Counsel for the petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Joshi, contended that the rent agreement does not reveal that the petitioner was tenant in Flat No. 606 but simply read \u201cTWO ROOM SET on 6th FLOOR, OUT OF SOCIETY\u201d in the layout plan of Vaidant Height, Nand Puri-B, Near Mahima Group Apartment, Guru Circle, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. He further submitted that while dismissing the application, the Rent Tribunal did not appreciate signatures of the first party; second party and witness 2 were obtained later on as the signatures followed mark \u2018X\u2019.<\/p>\n

The Court while dismissing the writ petition affirmed the order of the Rent Tribunal and explained that Flat No.606 was specifically mentioned in the eviction application under tenancy of the petitioner which, as per the order impugned, was not been disputed even by the petitioner, further the effect of the absence of flat number in the rent agreement was to be examined by the Rent Tribunal, in case any such objection existed in the reply filed by the petitioner and the counsel for petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in the eviction application which might invite application of the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Court further stated that the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC does not reveal any reason for filing it at such belated stage when the case was fixed for the final arguments which indicated malafide intention to delay the disposal of the eviction application. [Anil Joshi v. Beejal Chopra, 2020 SCC OnLine Raj 1256<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-08-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

*Suchita<\/span>\u00a0Shukla<\/span>, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Rent Tribunal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39059,31554,23504,43268,9741,7921],"class_list":["post-235008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-flat","tag-order-7-rule-11-cpc","tag-rajasthan-rent-control-act","tag-rent-tribunal","tag-tenancy","tag-tenant"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Rent Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-28T11:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-04T06:23:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-28T11:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-04T06:23:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Rent Tribunal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-28T11:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-04T06:23:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/","name":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-28T11:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-04T06:23:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/raj-hc-petitioner-failed-to-point-out-any-averment-or-omission-in-eviction-application-that-might-invite-application-of-or-7-r-11-cpc-court-dismisses-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Petitioner failed to point out any averment or omission in eviction application that might invite application of Or. 7 R. 11 CPC: Court dismisses petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/raj-hc-no-material-change-reflected-in-the-pleadings-thus-petitioner-barred-to-contend-re-framing-of-issues\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | No material change reflected in the pleadings, thus petitioner barred to contend re framing of issues","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., dismissed the petition filed for mainly amendment of the issues framed in the pleadings at a later stage. The facts of the case were that the respondent-landlord had filed an application under Section 18(2) of the Rajasthan Rent Control\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":356606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/delhi-hc-decrees-eviction-based-on-admissions\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Admissions can be inferred from vague\/evasive denials\u2019; Delhi HC decrees eviction based on admissions despite denial of landlord-tenant relationship","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The issues that have been set up in defence by the respondent are such that it will not be possible for him to succeed even if these are entertained, so far as concerns the recovery of possession of the subject premises. No useful purpose will thus be served if the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"eviction based on admissions","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/del-hc-dismisses-revision-petition-to-challenge-order-performance-oral-agreement-to-sell-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses Revision Petition to challenge Order by ADJ holding suit for specific performance of oral agreement to sell maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018It is no longer res integra that to determine an application under Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, it is only averments made in the plaint that can be considered.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/raj-hc-bona-fide-necessity-to-run-business-from-a-place-will-be-decided-by-landlord-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":3},"title":"Bona fide necessity to run business from a place will be decided by landlord; tenant cannot resist eviction dictating landlord alternative places: Rajasthan HC","author":"Editor","date":"January 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner\/tenant is not able to demonstrate the extreme hardship caused to him upon vacating the premises in dispute. The litigation has consumed 10 years and thus, the hardship suffered by the respondent\/landlord is more than the tenant.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":162004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/06\/a-tenant-has-no-right-to-file-frivolous-applications-without-a-substantial-cause-before-the-rent-tribunal\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":4},"title":"A tenant has no right to file frivolous applications without a substantial cause before the Rent Tribunal","author":"Saba","date":"October 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The landlord-petitioners filed an eviction petition on the ground of personal and bona fide necessity before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur in the year 2010 which continues to languish despite the lapse of 7 years at the stage of the landlord's evidence for reason of stalling tactics by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/rajasthan-high-court-orders-speedy-disposal-appeals-pending-before-appellate-rent-tribunal-scc-times-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":235008,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Speedy disposal of cases a fundamental right\u2019; Rajasthan HC orders expeditious disposal of appeals pending before Appellate Rent Tribunal","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that delays by Appellate Tribunals in deciding appeals under Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, defeats the purpose of the law, which aims to ensure the speedy disposal of eviction cases.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Speedy disposal rent appeals","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Speedy-disposal-rent-appeals.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Speedy-disposal-rent-appeals.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Speedy-disposal-rent-appeals.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Speedy-disposal-rent-appeals.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235008\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}