{"id":234716,"date":"2020-08-24T17:15:57","date_gmt":"2020-08-24T11:45:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=234716"},"modified":"2020-08-28T12:27:16","modified_gmt":"2020-08-28T06:57:16","slug":"jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order and allowed the petition as the Detaining Authority had failed to mention in the detention order about the petitioner\u2019s right to make representation.<\/p>\n

In the present appeal, Wajid Haseeb, counsel for petitioner vehemently opposed the detention order passed against him. The detenu is who is already facing trial before a competent court of law detenu was enlarged on bail by the competent court of law but despite such order, he was not released. It was further contended that owing to this, the possibility of the detenu to be implicated in anti-national protests, such as stone-pelting seems farfetched and grounds taken in the detention order and the material referred to and relied upon has no relevance as he wasn\u2019t actually released. Furthermore, it was submitted that the absence of material the detention order is passed on mere ipsi dixit<\/em> of detaining authority, therefore, the detention order is bad in law.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on certain decisions of the Supreme Court to reach its verdict:<\/p>\n

Khudiram Das v. State of W. B., <\/em>(1975) 2 SCR 81<\/strong> — the Supreme Court explained what is meant by \u2018grounds on which the order is made\u2019 in context of the duties cast upon the detaining authority and the corresponding rights accruing to the detenu under Article 22(5).<\/p>\n

Icchu Devi Choraria v. Union of India, <\/em>(1980) 4 SCC 531<\/a><\/strong> — the Supreme Court has taken the view that documents, statements and other materials referred to or relied upon in the grounds of detention by the detaining authority in arriving at its subjective satisfaction get incorporated and become part of the grounds of detention by reference. The right of the detenu to be supplied copies of such documents, statements and other materials flow directly as a necessary corollary from the right conferred on the detenu to be afforded the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the detention, because unless the former right is available the latter cannot be meaningfully exercised.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that the only precious and valuable right guaranteed to a detenu is of making an effective representation against the order of detention. Such an effective representation can only be made by a detenu when he is supplied the relevant grounds of detention, including the materials considered by the detaining authority for arriving at the requisite subjective satisfaction to pass the detention order. Since the material was not supplied to the detenu, the right of the detenu to file such representation was clearly impinged upon and the detention order stood resultantly vitiated. [Junaid Ahmad Dar v. State, 2020 SCC OnLine J&K 408<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-08-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order and allowed the petition as the Detaining Authority had <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32944,3365,30503],"class_list":["post-234716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-detaining-authority","tag-detention","tag-detenu"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order and allowed the petition as the Detaining Authority had\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-24T11:45:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-28T06:57:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-24T11:45:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-28T06:57:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order and allowed the petition as the Detaining Authority had","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-24T11:45:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-28T06:57:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","name":"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-24T11:45:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-28T06:57:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&K Public Safety Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":220155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-quashed-for-non-supplying-of-the-material-relied-upon-by-detaining-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention quashed for non-supplying of the material relied upon by detaining authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order of Masood Ahmad Bhat while directing for his release from the preventive custody. Denetu, Masood Ahmad Bhat, sought quashing of detention order dated 22-01-2019. The grounds of which the detention order was challenged were as follows: No\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214462,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/j-detenu-to-be-released\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | Failure to communicate ground of detention to detenu is denial of Constitutional right under Art. 22(5); detenu to be released","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: This Habeas Corpus petition was filed before the Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey, J., for quashing of a detention order passed by District Magistrate by which detenu was detained. Mir Shafaqat Hussain, learned counsel on behalf of petitioner submitted that detenu can make a representation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/11\/jk-hc-high-court-does-not-sit-in-appeal-over-decision-of-detaining-authority-and-cannot-substitute-its-own-opinion-over-that-of-detaining-authority-when-grounds-of-detention-are-precise-and-releva\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | HC does not sit in appeal over decision of detaining authority and cannot substitute its own opinion, when grounds of detention are precise & relevant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan J., in a matter relating to preventive detention declined to provide opinion over that of detaining authority and reiterated that the object of preventive detention is not to punish a man but to prevent from any further acts. The present case relates to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236917,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/j-writ-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":3},"title":"J&K HC | ‘Subjective satisfaction of a detaining authority to detain a person is not open to objective assessment by a Court\u02bc; Writ Petition dismissed\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J., while dismissing a criminal writ petition seeking to challenge the grounds preferred for detention, said, \u201cA Court is not a proper forum to scrutinize the merits of administrative decision to detain a person.\u201d Brief Facts Petitioner in the instant case was arrested\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276197,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":4},"title":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu’s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a detenu was provided with the illegible copy of documents relating to his detention, the bench of Ajay S. Rastogi* and CT Ravikumar, JJ has held that Thus, the right to make representation is a fundamental right of the detenu under Article 22(5) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/13\/failure-furnishing-documents-delay-deciding-detenu-representation-violates-art-225\/","url_meta":{"origin":234716,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Failure in furnishing documents & delay in deciding detenu\u2019s representation violates Art. 22(5)\u2019: SC quashes detention order under COFEPOSA","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the matters pertaining to personal liberty of the citizens, the Authorities are enjoined with a constitutional obligation to decide the representation with utmost expedition. Each day\u2019s delay matters in such a case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"detention order under COFEPOSA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234716\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}