{"id":234301,"date":"2020-08-20T12:41:05","date_gmt":"2020-08-20T07:11:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=234301"},"modified":"2020-08-21T10:19:21","modified_gmt":"2020-08-21T04:49:21","slug":"p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court:<\/strong> Suvir Sehgal, J., dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability and directed the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner has sought for the quashing of the order passed by the respondent in Consumer Complaint No. 35 of 2019 dated 08-01-2020, 26-02-2020 and 11-05-2020 and in M.A. No. 837 of 2020 dated 19-03-2020 along with direction for setting aside of final order dated 26-08-2019 and entire proceedings initiated under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. This petition comes as a result of an order dated 26-08-2020 rendered by the State Commission in which the petitioner has been directed to refund an amount along with interest and compensation. It is to be noted that the order dated 26-08-2020 has not been appealed by the petitioner before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<em>, <\/em>New Delhi. The order was passed ex-parte due to the absence of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner, Anand Chhibbar and Gaurav Mankotia contended that the petitioner has no relation with the present matter and that the respondent had not received any notice of the consumer complaint which let to his absence during the proceedings that ensued.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was then questioned over the maintainability of the petition which led to the tribunal perusing Section 27-A(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which affirms the remedy of appeal. The Court observed that as per the Act, an appeal from the State Commission lies before the National Commission. In the instant case the petitioner has erroneously approached the High Court instead of the National Commission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court then referred to the case titled <em>Cicily Kallarackal v. Vehicle Factory<\/em><strong>, <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5h02xUYA\">(2012) 8 SCC 524<\/a> and stated that orders of the State Commission are appealable before the National Commission and that it would be improper for the Court to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above-stated facts, provisions and judgments the Court held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 itself provides for filing of an appeal before the specially constituted forum under the said Act and that deciding the present petition would be untenable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Resultantly, the petition has been dismissed by the Court for being non-maintainable granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.[Pranav Ansal v. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissioner, Punjab, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/exWHx9i0\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 1182<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-08-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court: Suvir Sehgal, J., dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability and directed the petitioner to avail <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[18321,28314],"class_list":["post-234301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consumer-protection-act","tag-remedy-of-appeal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court: Suvir Sehgal, J., dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability and directed the petitioner to avail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T07:11:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-21T04:49:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-20T07:11:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-21T04:49:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition","og_description":"Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court: Suvir Sehgal, J., dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability and directed the petitioner to avail","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-20T07:11:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-21T04:49:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","name":"P&H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-20T07:11:05+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-21T04:49:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":324190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/bombay-hc-reiterates-writ-jurisdiction-exclusion-discretionary-not-compulsory\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":0},"title":"Rule of exclusion of writ jurisdiction due to availability of alternative remedy is discretionary and not compulsory; Bombay HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Remanding the consumer dispute back to the District Consumer Commission, the Court relied on MP State Agro Industries Development Corp. Ltd v. Jahan Khan, wherein it was observed that a Court may not entertain a writ petition due to availability of an alternative remedy, but the said rule cannot be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/raj-hc-dis-execution-proceeding-arrest-warrant-against-nokia-solutions-networks-india-ltd-an-uninvolved-party-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court dismisses Execution Proceeding &amp; arrest warrant against Nokia Solutions &amp; Networks India (P) Ltd, an uninvolved party","author":"Ritu","date":"November 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act penalties are intended for parties responsible for complying with a Commission\u2019s order and as the petitioner was not involved in the transaction or compliance, the proceedings against them were without basis.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/10\/haj-pilgrims-not-consumer-under-section-21d-of-the-consumer-protection-act-cannot-claim-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":2},"title":"Haj pilgrims not \u2018consumer\u2019 under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, cannot claim compensation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The perusal of the \u2018Green\u2019 guidelines for Haj-2008 in its clause 18 gave clarity on \u201cHaj Committee of India not being in the purview of Consumer Protection Act 1986, which is not liable to compensate any pilgrims intending to go on \u2018Haj\u2019 pilgrimage.\u201d The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/consumer-protection-act-1986-is-not-meant-to-be-a-tool-to-obtain-wrong-gains-or-to-create-nuisance-value\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":3},"title":"Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is not meant to be a tool to obtain wrong gains or to create \u2018nuisance value\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench of Dr S.M. Kantikar and Dinesh Singh, Members, dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the State Commission. The petitioners, in this case, had purchased a car in the name of their company Harmony Colonizers (P) Ltd. from respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347834,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/the-legality-of-execution-appeals-under-the-consumer-protection-act-1986\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":4},"title":"The Legality of \u201cExecution Appeals\u201d Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986","author":"Editor","date":"May 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Namrata Chandorkar*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Execution Appeals","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Execution-Appeals.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Execution-Appeals.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Execution-Appeals.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Execution-Appeals.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297998,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/whether-slp-under-art-136-against-ncdrc-order-be-entertained-sc-answers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":234301,"position":5},"title":"Consumer Dispute| Supreme Court explains the scope of maintainability of SLP under Art 136 against NCDRC orders","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court explained that the power to special leave is an exceptional and overriding power, naturally it must be exercised sparingly and with caution and only in very exceptional situations. It will only be used to advance the cause of justice and its exercise will be governed by well-established principles.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"slp under article 136 against ncdrc order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234301\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}