{"id":233868,"date":"2020-08-13T13:30:36","date_gmt":"2020-08-13T08:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233868"},"modified":"2020-08-28T13:53:04","modified_gmt":"2020-08-28T08:23:04","slug":"medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/","title":{"rendered":"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) and Dinesh Singh (Member), while addressing the issue of medical negligence by the doctors of Christian Medical College, Vellore awarded compensation to the deceased’ wife.<\/p>\n

Deceased got admitted to as a private patient at Christian Medical College, Vellore — OP and on being examined it was found to be a case of Coronary Artery Disease.<\/p>\n

The treating doctor advised the deceased to undergo Coronary Angiogram test when the same was conducted, the doctor expressed that it would be better if the patient undergoes Coronary Arterial By-pass Graft<\/strong> (CABG) surgery instead of angioplasty to avoid multiple stenting.<\/span><\/p>\n

After a couple of days, Dr Sujit discontinued medicines Ecospirin and Clopidogrel and started Heparin 5000 units 6 hourly.<\/p>\n

Heparin was started without any laboratory investigations and monitoring protocol.<\/p>\n

Complainant had notice bleeding at the site of insertion of the needle but the said complaint was ignored by the doctors.<\/p>\n

On the 3rd does of Heparin being given to the patient, it was noted that he suffered from a mini-stroke after that.<\/p>\n

An immediate CT Scan was to be done but no stroke evaluation was suggested by the doctor. Later the deceased was transferred to the Thoracic surgery unit in Semi-ICU. Neurologist suggested a CT-Brain Plain study but the same was delayed.<\/span><\/p>\n

The neurologist after conducting the above-stated scan informed the complainant that as the patient already progressed into coma, nothing more could be done. Finally, doctors suggested the family that they should accept the inevitable event and instead of wasting money allow them to withdraw ventilator support.<\/span><\/p>\n

Later, the complainant took the opinion of several other doctors who said that the delay caused for stroke management was fatal and it was due to lapses in the hospital.<\/span><\/p>\n

Patients once again suffered a stroke and died on nothing being done by the doctors.<\/p>\n

In view of the above-stated, present consumer complaint was filed for medical negligence and callousness of the doctors at CMC causing the death of the patient.<\/p>\n

Commission on perusal of the facts and submissions of the case stated that, the high-risk patients living in the hospital\/nursing homes or undergoing cardiac procedures should have monitoring systems to help alert the doctor\/staff immediately.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Adding to its analysis, the bench also stated that pre-hospital triage and communication between radiologists, neurologists and emergency physicians are more vital.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Delay in diagnosis and management of stroke was a deficiency and not a reasonable or standard of practice.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Another significant setback that was noted was that there was an urgent need for a brain CT scan of the patient but it was delayed for more than 3 hours for the want of a fresh receipt of Rs 1850 towards CT scan charges even though complainants had already deposited 150000 in advance.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

For the above instance, the bench stated,<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Hospital has every right to insist the payment but it was also a prime duty to care the emergency patient.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In view of the above, deficiency\/negligence was conclusively established and hence ac compensation of Rs 25 lakhs with an interest of 8% p.a was awarded. [Yashumati Devi v. Christian Medical College, 2020 SCC OnLine NCDRC 211<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-08-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Suggested Reading<\/span><\/h3>\n

Latest addition to EBC’s Layman Series — Consumer Claims [Buy Now]<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

SCC Online is now on Telegram and Instagram. Join our channel\u00a0@scconline<\/a>\u00a0on Telegram and\u00a0@scconline_<\/a>\u00a0on Instagram and stay updated with the latest legal news from within and outside India<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0A Division Bench of Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) and Dinesh Singh (Member), while addressing the issue <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43074,14601,39605,11241,43026,33805,36115,3485,33965,43075],"class_list":["post-233868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-coma","tag-consumer","tag-consumer-complaint","tag-consumer-protection","tag-consumer-rights","tag-deficiency","tag-doctor","tag-medical_negligence","tag-patient","tag-stroke-management"],"yoast_head":"\n[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0A Division Bench of Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) and Dinesh Singh (Member), while addressing the issue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-13T08:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-28T08:23:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/\",\"name\":\"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-13T08:00:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-28T08:23:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0A Division Bench of Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) and Dinesh Singh (Member), while addressing the issue","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-13T08:00:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-28T08:23:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/","name":"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2020-08-13T08:00:36+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-28T08:23:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/medical-negligence-ncdrc-rigid-protocols-prevailed-over-medical-ethics-hospital-has-right-to-insist-payment-but-the-prime-duty-is-the-care-of-emergency-patient\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Medical Negligence] NCDRC | Rigid protocols prevailed over medical ethics; Hospital has right to insist payment but the prime duty is the care of emergency patient"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/24\/medical-negligence-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":0},"title":"Whether non-referral of patient to Specialist or higher centre amounts to deficiency in service or medical negligence of the treating doctor\/hospital? NCDRC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Justice R.K. Agarwal (President) and Dr S.M. Kantikar and Binoy Kumar (Members) decided a matter with regard to alleged medical negligence. Issue for Consideration: Whether non-referral of the patient to the Specialist or higher centre amounts to deficiency in service or medical negligence of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/medical-negligence-deficiency-in-service-care-hospital-associated-infections-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC finds Care Hospital liable for deficiency in services which led to a patient contracting and ultimately dying due to Hospital Associated Infections","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This 24-year-old matter revolved around a sixth-generation leading jeweller of Hyderabad who in 2002 underwent coronary surgery at Care Hospital but developed life threatening complications after the operation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/27\/ncdrc-medical-negligence-no-cure-is-not-negligence-of-doctor-complainant-despite-reasonable-treatment-was-not-recovering-doctor-not-liable-for-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC | Medical Negligence | No cure is not negligence of doctor; Complainant despite reasonable treatment was not recovering — Doctor not liable for negligence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Dr S.M. Kantikar (Presiding Member) addressed a matter wherein medical negligence was been alleged. OP -- Dr. Vinod Bele has been alleged to caused medical negligence resulting to radial nerve injury due to negligent administration of injection in the arm of the patient. Previously, district\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":177024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":3},"title":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice","author":"Saba","date":"December 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi: In the order passed by Ajit Bharioke, S.M. Kantikar,J., for the complaint filed by plaintiff (patient\/minor) in order to seek compensation on the ground of alleged medical negligence on the part of treating doctor. The allegations being that the plaintiff was suffering from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/27\/sc-upholds-ncdrc-order-denying-medical-negligence-res-ipsa-loquitor\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":4},"title":"Strong incriminating evidence required for application of Res Ipsa Loquitor doctrine; SC upholds NCDRC order denying medical negligence","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFor applying the principles of Res Ipsa Locutor, it is necessary that a \u2018Res\u2019 is present to establish the allegation of negligence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Res IPSA Loquitor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Res-IPSA-Loquitor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Res-IPSA-Loquitor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Res-IPSA-Loquitor.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Res-IPSA-Loquitor.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222052,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/ncdrc-medical-negligence-hospital-found-vicariously-liable-for-negligence-in-treatment-of-patient\/","url_meta":{"origin":233868,"position":5},"title":"NCDRC | Medical Negligence | Hospital found vicariously liable for negligence in treatment of patient","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member), while disposing of the present application with respect to negligence of doctors, noted a very significant point, that, \u201cA doctor writing a prescription advised by any doctor cannot be said to be negligent only on account of his writing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233868\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}