{"id":233776,"date":"2020-08-11T17:40:39","date_gmt":"2020-08-11T12:10:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233776"},"modified":"2020-08-14T10:12:46","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T04:42:46","slug":"hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Tarlok Singh Chauhan J., dismissed petition finding no merits in it.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case can be traced from an official memorandum i.e. \u2018O.M.\u2019 dated 29-03 2013 enhancing the retirement age of the Blind Government Employees from 58 years to 60 years which was withdrawn by the State vide office memorandum dated 4-11-2019 bringing the retirement age back to 58 years. Aggrieved against the withdrawal present petitions have been filed praying for its disposal in their favor.<\/p>\n

Counsel Mr Subhash Mohan Snehi, Mr Sudhanshu Jamwal, Mr Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Mr Onkar Jairath, Mr Shubham Sood and Mr Bhim Raj Sharma represented the petitioners and Mr Ashok Sharma, Mr Vinod Thakur, Mr Ranjan Sharma, Mr Desh Raj Sharma and Ms Svaneel Jaswal represented the State i.e the respondents.<\/p>\n

After hearing both the parties, the Court relied on judgment titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Hirendra Pal Singh,<\/em>\u00a0(2011) 5 SCC 305<\/a> held that fixation of the retirement age falls within exclusive domain and competence of the State and that Courts should not interfere with such decision unless they were unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

Relevant para reads:<\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 8. \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.. So far as the issue of reduction of age from 62<\/em><\/p>\n

to 60 years is concerned, it has not been brought to the notice<\/em><\/p>\n

of the High Court that it is within the exclusive domain of the<\/em><\/p>\n

State Government to reduce the age even in Government<\/em><\/p>\n

services. So in case of purely professional engagement, the age<\/em><\/p>\n

could validly be reduced by the State Government<\/em><\/p>\n

unilaterally.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It was further observed by the Court that executive instructions to have the force of statutory rules, it must be shown that they have been issued either under the authority conferred on the State Government by some statute or under some provision of the constitution provides, therefore. In the instant case, the OMs in question has not been issued either under the authority conferred on the State Government by some statute or under some provision of the constitution, therefore, it has to be held in the nature of administrative instructions and not statutory rules. Hence petitioners have failed to prove that the OM\u2019s are illegal and arbitrary.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, OM stands valid, and the petition was dismissed. [Ses Ram v. State of H.P., 2020 SCC OnLine HP 1119<\/b><\/a>, decided on 31-07-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43052,43051,38528],"class_list":["post-233776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-administrative-action","tag-government-notification","tag-retirement-age"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":410,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Administrative Action\",\"Government Notification\",\"Retirement Age\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/11\\\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law","og_description":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law","datePublished":"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/"},"wordCount":410,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Administrative Action","Government Notification","Retirement Age"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/","name":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-11T12:10:39+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-14T04:42:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/hp-hc-fixation-of-retirement-age-through-government-notification-is-an-administrative-action-within-the-exclusive-jurisdiction-of-state-not-open-to-challenge-in-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Fixation of retirement age through government notification is an administrative action within the exclusive jurisdiction of State; not open to challenge in a court of law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300270,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/28\/retired-employees-cannot-claim-vested-right-apply-extended-age-retirement-retrospectively-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":0},"title":"Retired employees cannot claim vested right to apply the extended age of retirement retrospectively: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation does not have any role to play in matters that are strictly governed by the service regulations. This is an exercise that is undertaken by the State in discharge of its public duties and should not brook undue interference by the Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"extended age of retirement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/extended-age-of-retirement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/extended-age-of-retirement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/extended-age-of-retirement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/extended-age-of-retirement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359848,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/11\/reserved-candidates-migration-to-general-category-seats-barred-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":1},"title":"Reserved candidates cannot be permitted to migrate to general category seats if relevant recruitment rules impose an embargo: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether a reserved candidate, who has availed relaxation in fees\/upper age limit, to participate in open competition with general candidates may be recruited against unreserved seats, would depend on the facts of each case\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Reserved category migration to general category","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reserved-category-migration-to-general-category.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reserved-category-migration-to-general-category.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reserved-category-migration-to-general-category.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reserved-category-migration-to-general-category.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/16\/reserved-category-candidates-age-and-fee-relaxation-compete-unreserved-category-recruitment-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":2},"title":"Reserved category candidates can compete in unreserved category for PSC\u2019s recruitment process based on merit, even after availing age and fee relaxation: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The instant matter involved a dispute over the preparation of a merit list for government posts in West Bengal, with a focus on the treatment of candidates from reserved categories who had availed age and fee relaxations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/payment-of-gratuity-act-applicable-to-anganwadi-workers-helpers-tripurahc-reiterates-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":3},"title":"Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 is applicable to anganwadi workers and helpers working in the State: Tripura HC reiterates","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The anganwadi centres are the creation of the Intensive Child Development Services Scheme, launched in 1975 to address the issues of health, nutrition, and education needs of children and each anganwadi centre is managed by one anganwadi worker and one anganwadi helper to implement the Scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/retaining-an-employee-in-service-if-he-lacks-in-the-standard-of-efficiency-required-to-discharge-the-duties-of-the-post-he-presently-holds-is-not-in-public-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC | Retaining an employee in service if he lacks in the standard of efficiency required to discharge the duties of the post he presently holds is not in public interest","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of B P Routray and S. Muralidhar JJ. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The instant petition was filed by the Petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenging the order of compulsory retirement dated 23-08-2012 on attaining the age of 50 years in terms of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/compulsory-retirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":233776,"position":5},"title":"On what basis is an employee compulsory retired? An account of Compulsory Retired, IRS Officer | Read Del HC\u2019s opinion stressing on \u2018compulsory retirement, a subjective satisfaction\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"There can be water proof tents or heat proof houses but there cannot be \u201ccompulsory retirement proof employee\u201d even if, he has succeeded in few cases against the Central Government.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233776"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233776\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}