{"id":233675,"date":"2020-08-10T12:54:15","date_gmt":"2020-08-10T07:24:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233675"},"modified":"2020-08-14T11:06:53","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T05:36:53","slug":"prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","title":{"rendered":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan&#8217;s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra, J refused to accept the explanation of advocate Bhushan and said that further hearing is required in the matter.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Before reaching to any finding whether the statement made as to \u201cCorruption\u201d would per se amount to Contempt of Court, the matter is required to be heard. &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The will now hear the matter on August 17, 2020.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Earlier, on August 4, the Court had said that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/04\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-we-seek-to-balance-freedom-of-speech-the-need-to-protect-the-dignity-of-the-court-sc\/\"><strong><em>t<\/em><em>here is a thin line between freedom of speech and the need to protect the dignity of the judiciary as an institution and it sought to balance both<\/em><\/strong>.<\/a> The hearing in the 11-year-old case which pertains to an interview given by Bhushan to Tehelka where he said that half of past 16 Chief Justices of India (CJIs) were corrupt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On July 22, 2020, in another matter, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/sc-issues-notice-in-suo-motu-contempt-petition-against-advocate-prashant-bhushan-and-twitter\/\">a 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari, JJ had issued notice in the suo motu contempt petition initiated by the Supreme Court against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The matter deals with certain tweets made by Bhushan. He had recently criticised the Supreme Court and the sitting and former CJIs in a couple of tweets which prompted the Supreme Court to initiate suo motu contempt petition against him. Here are the tweets:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-232656 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?resize=398%2C393&amp;ssl=1\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 398px) 100vw, 398px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?resize=300%2C296&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?resize=60%2C60&amp;ssl=1 60w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?w=734&amp;ssl=1 734w\" alt=\"\" width=\"398\" height=\"393\" data-attachment-id=\"232656\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/sc-issues-notice-in-suo-motu-contempt-petition-against-advocate-prashant-bhushan-and-twitter\/pb-tweets-contempt\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?fit=734%2C724&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"734,724\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"PB Tweets Contempt\" data-image-description=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?fit=300%2C296&amp;ssl=1\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/PB-Tweets-Contempt.jpg?fit=300%2C296&amp;ssl=1\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In his reply to the suo motu petition, Bhushan said that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe expression of opinion, however outspoken, disagreeable or unpalatable to some, cannot constitute contempt of court\u2026\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to PTI, in a 142-page reply affidavit filed through lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, the activist lawyer has referred to several Supreme Court judgments, speeches of former and<br \/>\nserving judges on contempt of court and the stifling of dissent in a democracy and his views on judicial actions in some cases. He has also stood by his two tweets.\u2019<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cTo prevent a citizen from forming, holding, and expressing a bonafide opinion\u2019 in public interest on any institution that is a creature of the Constitution is not a reasonable restriction and violates the basic principles on which our democracy is founded.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The affidavit said the power of contempt under Article 129 of the Constitution should be utilized to aid in administration of justice and not to shut out voices that seek accountability from the court for the errors of omissions and commissions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for advocate Prashant Bhushan, in the suo motu contempt petition initiated by the Supreme Court against Advocate Bhushan, asked the Court,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThis is criticism\u2026 Why don\u2019t you take it objectively?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He also submitted that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em><strong>if a judge is defamed, he should seek relief in the ordinary laws of defamation<\/strong><\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He further submitted that a sitting judge, who went on to become a CJI, had \u2018criticised\u2019 the functioning of the Supreme Court in a presser in January 2018. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, one of the four judges who had met the media, went on to become the 46th Chief Justice and Justice Bobde\u2019s immediate predecessor. Dave, in his submission said,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe holding of January 2018 press conference was fully justified. If the then CJI was not listening to their points, what could they do? If citizens stand up and criticise the system, say everything is not hunky-dory, how can it be contempt?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court has reserved the judgment in the said matter. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/05\/prashant-bhushan-contempt-courts-should-take-criticism-objectively-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-tells-sc-judgment-reserved\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em><strong>Read more<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>[Amicus Curiae v. Prashant Bhushan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pPIa393S\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine SC 635<\/b><\/a>, order dated 10.08.2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>SCC Online is now on Telegram and Instagram. Join our channel\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/scconline\">@scconline<\/a>\u00a0on Telegram and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/scconline_\/\">@scconline_<\/a>\u00a0on Instagram and stay updated with the latest legal news from within and outside India<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2564,42900,42901,3623,33634,37130,42899,42647,17121],"class_list":["post-233675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Contempt","tag-dignity-of-court","tag-free-speech","tag-freedom_of_speech","tag-prashant-bhushan","tag-tarun-tejpal","tag-tehelka","tag-tweet","tag-twitter"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan&#039;s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan&#039;s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-10T07:24:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-14T05:36:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/\",\"name\":\"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan's explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-10T07:24:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-14T05:36:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan&#8217;s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan's explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan's explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-10T07:24:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-14T05:36:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","name":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan's explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2020-08-10T07:24:15+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-14T05:36:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan&#8217;s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/17\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-can-allegations-of-corruption-against-judges-be-made-publicly-sc-frames-larger-questions\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":0},"title":"Prashant Bhushan &#8211; Tehelka Contempt| Can allegations of corruption against Judges be made publicly? SC frames larger questions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After it refused to accept the explanation of advocate Prashant Bhushan in the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, BR Gavai and MR Shah, JJ has framed larger questions in the matter that will have far-reaching\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/04\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-we-seek-to-balance-freedom-of-speech-the-need-to-protect-the-dignity-of-the-court-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":1},"title":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| We seek to balance freedom of speech &#038; the need to protect the dignity of the Court: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra, J said that there is a thin line between freedom of speech and the need to protect the dignity of the judiciary as an institution and it sought\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232640,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/sc-initiates-suo-motu-contempt-proceedings-against-advocate-prashant-bhushan-and-twitter-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":2},"title":"SC initiates suo motu contempt proceedings against advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari, JJ will today be hearing the suo motu contempt petition initiated by the Supreme Court against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter India. The matter deals with certain tweets made by Bhushan, the details of the same\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Contempt-Bhushan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Contempt-Bhushan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Contempt-Bhushan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Contempt-Bhushan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Contempt-Bhushan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/05\/prashant-bhushan-contempt-courts-should-take-criticism-objectively-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-tells-sc-judgment-reserved\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":3},"title":"Prashant Bhushan Contempt| Courts should take criticism objectively; Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave tells SC; Judgment reserved","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: \u201cThis is criticism... Why don\u2019t you take it objectively?\u201d asked senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for advocate Prashant Bhushan, in the suo motu contempt petition initiated by the Supreme Court against Advocate Bhushan. The matter deals with certain tweets made by Bhushan. He had recently criticised the Supreme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232653,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/sc-issues-notice-in-suo-motu-contempt-petition-against-advocate-prashant-bhushan-and-twitter\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":4},"title":"SC issues notice in suo motu contempt petition against advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter [Full report]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari, JJ has issued notice in the suo motu contempt petition initiated by the Supreme Court against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter. The Court has asked Bhushan to file a detailed response by next date of hearing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/notice-issued-to-advocate-prashant-bhushan-on-contempt-petition-filed-by-ag-and-centre\/","url_meta":{"origin":233675,"position":5},"title":"Notice issued to advocate Prashant Bhushan on contempt petition filed by AG and Centre","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of Arun Mishra and Navin Sinha, JJ\u00a0has given 3 weeks to advocate Prashant Bhushan on contempt pleas by Attorney General K K Venugopal and the Centre for his tweets allegedly criticising the court over the appointment of M Nageswara Rao as interim CBI director. The bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}