{"id":233660,"date":"2020-08-10T12:00:01","date_gmt":"2020-08-10T06:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233660"},"modified":"2020-08-14T11:09:07","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T05:39:07","slug":"ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court:<\/strong> Anu Sivaram, J. allowed the Writ Petition by directing the respondent to only decide the amount of liability after having afforded the petitioner the chance to put forth his side<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the Petitioner who is the former Director of T.K. Manufacturing Enterprises Private Limited had entered into a contract for manufacture and supply of electricity poles to the respondent Board. The contract was awarded in the year 2000 and terminated in 2002, alleging delay in executing the work. The Company had while entering into the contract, given security by way of Bank Guarantee which, according to the petitioner, was encashed by the respondent Board towards liquidated damages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was served with a revenue recovery notice by the respondent. The petitioner raised objection against the recovery proceedings and approached the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court had directed the respondent Board to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits. Having afforded an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, he submitted evidence to prove his contentions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court reprimanded the respondent and held that the Chairman was bound to deal with those contentions and take a reasoned decision. Moreover, nothing was brought on record to indicate that a proper process of quantification of liability with notice to the petitioner was undertaken prior to the initiation of the revenue recovery proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>It is settled law that one party to an agreement cannot unilaterally quantify the liability and proceed for recovery.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Writ Petition was allowed on the grounds that the liability of the petitioner cannot and should not be quantified without giving him a chance to appear and give his side. [Sundeep Abraham v. Kerala State Electricity Board, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6bBW05xU\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Ker 3048<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-08-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: Anu Sivaram, J. allowed the Writ Petition by directing the respondent to only decide the amount of liability after <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3981,3301,43012],"class_list":["post-233660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bank-guarantee","tag-liability","tag-revenue-recovery-notice"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Anu Sivaram, J. allowed the Writ Petition by directing the respondent to only decide the amount of liability after\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-10T06:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-14T05:39:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-10T06:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-14T05:39:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side","og_description":"Kerala High Court: Anu Sivaram, J. allowed the Writ Petition by directing the respondent to only decide the amount of liability after","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-10T06:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-14T05:39:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/","name":"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-10T06:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-14T05:39:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/ker-hc-a-party-to-contract-cannot-unilaterally-quantify-liability-and-proceed-for-recovery-from-the-other-side\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | A party to contract cannot unilaterally quantify liability and proceed for recovery from the other side"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon, JJ., held that the pawnor, merely by his act of delivering his own goods to a creditor in consideration of a credit facility granted to the debtor\/borrower, by legal fiction becomes liable for the entire debt, would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":284135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/court-cannot-interfere-with-enforcement-of-bank-guarantee-except-only-in-cases-where-fraud-or-special-equity-is-prima-facie-made-out-to-prevent-irretrievable-injustice-delhi-high-court-legal-researc\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":1},"title":"Court cannot interfere with the enforcement of a bank guarantee except cases where fraud or special equity is prima facie made out so as to prevent irretrievable injustice: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A Single Judge Bench of Chandra Dhari Singh, J. disposed of the petition and restrained from invoking\/encashing the bank guarantee.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":251822,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/28\/contract-act-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Does Exception 3 to S. 28 of Contract Act deal with claim period within which beneficiary is entitled to lodge claim? Court discusses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jayant Nath, J., held that, Exception 3 to Section 28 of the Contract Act deals with curtailment of the period for the creditor to approach the court\/tribunal to enforce his rights. It does not in any manner deal with the claim period within which the beneficiary is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258913,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/cal-hc-circumventing-invocation-of-bank-guarantee-justified-in-matters-of-irretrievable-injustices-and-special-equities-court-rejects-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":3},"title":"Cal HC | &#8220;Circumventing invocation of Bank Guarantee justified in matters of irretrievable injustices and special equities&#8221;: Court rejects application","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Moushami Bhatacharya J., while rejecting vacating application of an order of injunction on Yes Bank held that \"an unconditional bank guarantee results in an absolute obligation on the part of a bank to pay but there are exceptions to this rule namely, fraud which would vitiate the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/del-hc-is-the-liability-of-principal-borrower-and-guarantor-co-extensive-court-reiterates-scs-position-on-continuation-of-sarfaesi-proceedings-against-guarantor-by-banks\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Is the liability of Principal Borrower and Guarantor co-extensive? Court reiterates SC&#8217;s position on continuation of SARFAESI proceedings against Guarantor by banks","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., considered the following question: Whether a bank\/financial institution can institute or continue with proceedings against a guarantor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), when proceedings under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":26391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/18\/invocation-of-bank-guarantee-can-be-restrained-only-if-there-is-existence-of-fraud-irretrievable-injuryinjustice-or-special-equities\/","url_meta":{"origin":233660,"position":5},"title":"Invocation of bank guarantee can be restrained only if there is existence of fraud, irretrievable injury\/injustice or special equities","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 18, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While deciding a crucial matter relating to work contracts and\u00a0 bank guarantee the Division Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva and B.D. Ahmed JJ., observed that invocation of a bank guarantee cannot be restrained unless fraud, irretrievable injury\/injustice or special equities is proved. In the present case, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}