{"id":233588,"date":"2020-08-08T12:20:11","date_gmt":"2020-08-08T06:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233588"},"modified":"2020-08-14T11:21:46","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T05:51:46","slug":"sushant-singh-rajput-death-case-hearing-deferred-till-21st-august-2020-on-plea-seeking-cbi-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/sushant-singh-rajput-death-case-hearing-deferred-till-21st-august-2020-on-plea-seeking-cbi-investigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Sushant Singh Rajput death | Bom HC defers hearing till 21st August, 2020 on plea seeking CBI investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ, and A.S. Gadkari, JJ., deferred the hearing for PIL’s filed in view of the unnatural death of Sushant Singh Rajput, a film actor.<\/p>\n

In the present two Public Interest Litigations, it has been sought that CBI should be entrusted with the investigation into the unnatural death of a film actor, Sushant Singh Rajput.<\/p>\n

Advocate General for the State, A.A. Kumbhakoni informed the Court that a petition with similar relief was moved before the Supreme Court, but the same was dismissed.<\/p>\n

The petitioner on being asked for the copy of the petition stated answered in negative and added that the Supreme Court while dismissing the petition granted liberty to approach this Court.<\/p>\n

Another significant point that the Court noted was the Supreme Court’s order dated 5-08-2020 wherein a status report has been called for from the State of Maharashtra in regard to the stage of investigation by Mumbai Police.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Advocate General for the State states that the Court may not pass any order on the present petition and may await the Supreme Court’s decision.<\/p>\n

Additional Solicitor General, Anil Singh submitted that on acceptance of the request of the deceased father, the CBI has already registered an FIR, inter alia, under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860. He has also questioned the approach of the Mumbai Police in quarantining an IPS officer of the Bihar cadre, who had come to Mumbai for the purpose of ascertaining facts, although four other officers of Bihar Police who had earlier visited Mumbai were not meted out such treatment.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hence in view of the above stated, Court while deferring the hearing till 21-08-2020, stated that CBI has registered an FIR and it would not be appropriate, at this stage, to express any opinion either way. <\/span><\/p>\n

It would be just and proper to await the orders of the Supreme Court in the pending Transfer Petition, referred to above. [Priyanka Tibrewal v. UOI, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 848<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-08-2020]<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Also Read:<\/span><\/h3>\n

Sushant Singh Rajput death case| SC asks Mumbai Police to submit status of investigation so far; says truth must come out<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n