{"id":233455,"date":"2020-08-06T15:30:59","date_gmt":"2020-08-06T10:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233455"},"modified":"2020-08-14T11:54:25","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T06:24:25","slug":"kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of B.V. Nagarathna and Jyoti Mulimani, JJ. reversed a 1993 order, holding that all titles, rights and interests of the Koladamatt over the land in question had been extinguished by a government notification which vested the land in the State Government following the Mutt\u2019s failure to make an application to get registered as an applicant.<\/p>\n

The land had been leased to the appellant in 1967 to run an automobile industry, with permission to put up structures on the land. The land in question is a part of a larger extant of land which was granted as a minor inam<\/em> to the Mutt in 1897. However, a government notification dated 04.04.1970 notified 01.07.1970 as the date for vesting all inam<\/em> lands in the State Government, following which the appellant made an application for registration of occupancy rights that was granted in an order dated 1.9.1984. The Mutt challenged this before a single judge of the High Court who allowed its writ petition and set aside the Land Tribunal\u2019s 1984 order, and that decision had been challenged in the instant writ appeal.<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the Mutt lost all rights, interests and title in the land since it did not make an application for getting itself registered as an occupant as required by the Act. Therefore, they claimed that since the Mutt is not aggrieved by the Land Tribunal\u2019s order, it does not have the locus standi<\/em> to file the writ petition.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that upon the vesting of all inam lands in the State Government, certain rights were reserved in the inamdars and tenants, but since the Inamdar did not make an application under the Act, it did not seek to claim any right or privilege under the Act since the former is sine qua non<\/em> for the latter. Since the Mutt failed to file an application, all its rights under the Act stand extinguished. The Mutt had the right to raise contentions against the appellant\u2019s application before the Tribunal and to that narrow extent, it could file a writ petition, but it otherwise had no locus standi <\/em>to file the writ petition since it was not an aggrieved party and would derive no benefit from itself. The Bench also stated that the single judge erred in holding that the Act is applicable only to agricultural lands, since it could apply to non-agricultural lands such as uncultivated lands as well.<\/p>\n

Since there was a subsisting lease of the land in question on the date of vesting and its possession was with the tenant i.e., the appellant, the holder would be the appellant and not the Mutt. Possession of inam land in the hands of the tenants despite the vesting of the land in the State Government is to confer certain rights and benefits upon them under the Act, and \u201cthe Government shall not dispossess any person of any land in respect of which he is considered prima facie <\/em>entitled to be registered as an occupant.\u201d It found that the Mutt cannot be the occupant of the private building\/structures constructed on the land, and it would vest in the person who owned it immediately before the date of vesting i.e., in the appellant.<\/p>\n

Court, therefore, stated that the lessee\/appellant is entitled to registration of occupancy rights and the Mutt couldn\u2019t claim any benefit under the Act. It set aside the order by the single judge and allowed the writ appeals.[S. M. Kannappa Automobiles v. Koladamatt Mahasamsthana, 2020 SCC OnLine Kar 964<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-07-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.V. Nagarathna and Jyoti Mulimani, JJ. reversed a 1993 order, holding that all titles, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[42944,42945,34481,41775,14781,42943,42946,42942,7431],"class_list":["post-233455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-agricultural-lands","tag-inamdar","tag-land-dispute","tag-lessee","tag-locus-standi","tag-mutt","tag-o","tag-occupancy-rights","tag-state-government"],"yoast_head":"\nKar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.V. Nagarathna and Jyoti Mulimani, JJ. reversed a 1993 order, holding that all titles,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-06T10:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-14T06:24:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-06T10:00:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-14T06:24:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.V. Nagarathna and Jyoti Mulimani, JJ. reversed a 1993 order, holding that all titles,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-06T10:00:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-14T06:24:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/","name":"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-06T10:00:59+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-14T06:24:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/06\/kar-hc-koladamatt-not-entitled-to-registration-of-occupancy-rights-over-disputed-land\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Koladamatt not entitled to registration of occupancy rights over disputed land\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":339844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/28\/state-government-levy-royalty-on-production-and-disposal-of-brick-earth\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":0},"title":"Read why SC held that State Government can levy royalty on production and disposal of brick earth being a minor mineral","author":"Editor","date":"January 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On 01-06-1958, the Government of India published a notification in the exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Mineral (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 by which brick earth was declared a minor mineral within the meaning of the 1957 Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Royalty on brick earth","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Royalty-on-brick-earth.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Royalty-on-brick-earth.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Royalty-on-brick-earth.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Royalty-on-brick-earth.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/cal-hc-illegal-occupier-entitled-to-electricity-connection\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":1},"title":"Illegal occupants of government land entitled to electricity connection despite not having occupancy papers: Calcutta High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner was an illegal occupier of government land and as a result could not furnish the documents proving ownership or occupancy required under the JERC Regulations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Illegal occupier entitled to electricity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Illegal-occupier-entitled-to-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Illegal-occupier-entitled-to-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Illegal-occupier-entitled-to-electricity.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Illegal-occupier-entitled-to-electricity.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330196,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/06\/delhi-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-due-to-absence-of-law-for-availing-mutation-rights-in-urbanized-villages\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court takes suo motu cognizance due to absence of any law for availing mutation rights in urbanized villages","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018Such a legal vacuum disabling the villagers from managing their immovable properties prima facie violates their fundamental right under Article 21 and constitutional rights under Article 300A of the Constitution.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349047,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/bomhc-upholds-validity-of-rule-41a-of-maharashtra-land-revenue-transfer-of-occupancy-by-tribals-to-non-tribals-rules-1975\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC upholds validity of Rule 4(1)(a) of Maharashtra Land Revenue (Transfer of Occupancy by Tribals to Non-Tribals) Rules, 1975","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIndividual hardship by itself cannot be a ground to hold a provision to be invalid or unworkable especially in the light of the fact that such provision is enacted keeping in mind the Directive Principles under Article 46 of the Constitution for the larger good and welfare of tribals.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/27\/jagadish-v-state-of-karnataka-ptcl-act-granted-land-analysis-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":4},"title":"Granted Land under PTCL Act: An Analysis of Jagadish v. State of Karnataka","author":"Editor","date":"November 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Pavithra Thammaiah*, Amruthavarshini** and Esha Sanjyot Shah***","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"PTCL Act Granted Land Interpretation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/explained-supreme-court-tenants-right-to-pre-emption-urban-immovable-property-punjab-pre-emption-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":233455,"position":5},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court verdict on Tenants right to pre-emption in the ‘urban immovable property’ under Punjab Pre-Emption Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The notification dated 08-10-1985 limits its application for taking away the right of pre-emption only with reference to sale of land falling in the areas of any municipality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"right to pre-emption","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}