{"id":233038,"date":"2020-07-29T15:30:44","date_gmt":"2020-07-29T10:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233038"},"modified":"2020-07-31T11:04:42","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T05:34:42","slug":"del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | “No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act”: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all “orders” and has not made any exception to orders relating to custody.<\/span><\/p>\n

Petition was filed seeking setting aside of the Order passed in complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by the Metropolitan Magistrate.<\/p>\n

Due to a rift in the relationship of the husband and wife, respondent took away the three children to live with him under a separate roof.<\/p>\n

Protection Order & Custody Orders<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

By way of the present petition, petitioner sought reliefs such as Protection Order under Section 18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.<\/p>\n

Wife sought a restraining order against the respondent from dispossessing the wife from the shared household and monetary reliefs such as medical expenses and rentals including household expenses.<\/p>\n

In line of reliefs, Custody Order with respect to the three children were also sought under Section 21 of the Act. Application for various interim reliefs was also sought under Section 23 of the Act.<\/p>\n

Unhindered Access to Mother<\/span><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Court noted that for the sake of emotional quotient and robust psychological health, the mother should be provided unhindered access, if not physically then through video conferencing and the same was granted on 24th April, 2020.<\/p>\n

Magistrates’ Decision<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Custody of children was directed to be continued with the father as an interim measure visitation rights were granted the wife.<\/p>\n

Petition not maintainable<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Respondent’s counsel, Bobby Anand submitted that petitioner has a remedy of an appeal under Section 29 of the Act, hence the present petition is not maintainable under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n

Advocate Malvika Rajkotia, for the wife submitted that, a mother is best suited to look after the needs of growing daughters, particularly, the sensitivities of their emotional needs and biological requirements. <\/span><\/p>\n

She also submits that youngest daughter is under 5 years of age and it is a mandate under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 that the child should be in care and custody of the mother.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Present Petition is maintainable in this Court as mere availability of alternate remedy cannot be a ground to disentitle the relief under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n

Maintainability<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Supreme Court has time and again spelt out clear restraints on the use of extraordinary powers and observed that the High courts should not go beyond those wholesome inhibitions unless the extraordinary circumstances cry for immediate and timely judicial mandate.<\/p>\n

In the present matter, Court is not persuaded in to entertain the petition in its extraordinary power under Section 482 CrPC given the fact that there is a clear remedy of Appeal under Section 29 of the Act available.<\/p>\n

Hence, facts and circumstances in the present matter do not call for any urgent intervention to permit the petitioner in bypassing the remedy available in the form of Statutory Appeal.<\/p>\n

in view of the above, petition was dismissed.[Srisha Dinav Bansal v. Rajiv Bansal, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 764<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-07-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,42810,42813,42811,11851,9821,31822,42629,42812,13021],"class_list":["post-233038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-custody-order","tag-interim-reliefs","tag-legality","tag-legislature","tag-maintainability","tag-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005","tag-protection-order","tag-section-29-of-protection-f-women-from-domestic-violence-act","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | "No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | "No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-29T10:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-31T05:34:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | \\\"No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act\\\": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-29T10:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-31T05:34:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | “No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act”: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | \"No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act\": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | \"No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act\": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-29T10:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-31T05:34:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","name":"Del HC | \"No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act\": Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-29T10:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-31T05:34:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | “No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act”: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":232558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/del-hc-remedy-of-appeal-under-s-29-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-has-been-provided-against-all-orders-without-any-exception-to-custody-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Legislature provides remedy of Appeal under S. 29 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act against all orders","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing a matter with regard to \"custody order\" as being the primary relief, held that, Legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Act against all \"orders\" and has not made any exception to orders relating to custody. Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/domestic-violence-act-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":1},"title":"Is it proper to invoke S. 482 CrPC for quashing Magistrate’s order in a proceeding under S. 12 r\/w S. 23 of Domestic Violence Act on the point of maintainability? Cal HC determines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Bibek Chaudhari, J., considered the question as to whether Section 482 CrPC is applicable in relation to an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The following is a summary of High Court's determination on legal points that were before it for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/07\/inherent-powers-dv-act-interim-order-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":2},"title":"No Scope for inherent powers to interfere with interim orders passed under DV Act without manifest illegality: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs far as the present case is concerned, the interim order passed by the Magistrate cannot be said to be gross illegality or irregularity. The petitioner could very well approach the same court seeking order, modifying or vacating the aforesaid order if there are sufficient reasons. That apart, appeal is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"inherent powers DV Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inherent-powers-DV-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":3},"title":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings against the petitioners under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondents had invoked the provision contained in Section 12 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":54611,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/04\/revisional-power-of-high-court-under-crpc-held-intact-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":4},"title":"Revisional power of High Court under CrPC held intact under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Allowing the revision, the Court observed that the supervisory power or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court provided for under Sections 397(1) and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not negated or affected by the absence of a provision for appeal to the High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/kar-hc-is-petition-under-s-125-crpc-maintainable-when-an-order-of-compensation-has-been-granted-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":233038,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Is petition under S. 125 CrPC maintainable when an order of compensation has been granted under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Jyoti Mulmani J., allowed the revision petition on grounds of failure to ascertain and understand the material propositions involved in the case. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a legally wedded wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 28-02-2007 at Gayathri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}