{"id":233025,"date":"2020-07-29T11:00:18","date_gmt":"2020-07-29T05:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=233025"},"modified":"2020-07-29T11:07:31","modified_gmt":"2020-07-29T05:37:31","slug":"nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):<\/strong> A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice B.L. Bhat (Judicial member) rejected an appeal challenging an NCLT judgement where it allowed a liquidator to sell the assets of a company which had been attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) during the period of \u2018Moratorium\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Resolution Professional had filed an application before the NCLT for releasing the attachment of certain assets of Varrsana Ispat Limited (Corporate Debtor) by the ED. The NCLT held that ordering the release of the attached assets would not be maintainable since the attachment order was issued before the order of declaration of \u2018Moratorium\u2019 in the present case. The aforesaid NCLT order had been challenged in this appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal rejected the appellant\u2019s contentions that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would have an overriding effect over the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and that creditors and investigative agencies could not disrupt the \u2018Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process\u2019 during the period of \u2018Moratorium\u2019. The bench observed that since the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 pertained to \u2018proceeds of crime,\u2019 Section 14 of the I&amp;B Code would not be applicable to such a proceeding.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Order stated that the offence of money-laundering has nothing to do with the \u2018Corporate Debtor\u2019 but will be applicable to individuals such as ex-Directors and shareholders of the \u2018Corporate Debtor,\u2019 who cannot be given protection from the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 by taking advantage of Section 14 of the I&amp;B Code. Rather, it held that both the Acts would be invoked simultaneously. Since the attachments were made by the ED long before the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, this would disallow the \u2018Resolution Professional\u2019 from taking advantage of Section 14 of the I&amp;B Code. [Varrsana Ispat Limited v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 493 of 2018, decided on 27-07-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice B.L. Bhat (Judicial member) rejected an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[6131,37261,42805,6121,34534,19261,22074,22014,12521],"class_list":["post-233025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-bankruptcy","tag-ed","tag-ib","tag-insolvency","tag-liquidator","tag-money-laundering","tag-moratorium","tag-nclat","tag-nclt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice B.L. Bhat (Judicial member) rejected an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-29T05:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-29T05:37:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-29T05:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-29T05:37:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice B.L. Bhat (Judicial member) rejected an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-29T05:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-29T05:37:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","name":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-29T05:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-29T05:37:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323420,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/del-hc-dismisses-petition-seeking-guidelines-for-suspended-insolvency-professionals-by-insolvency-bankruptcy-board-india-disciplinary-committee-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition seeking Guidelines for Suspended Insolvency Professionals by IBBI Disciplinary Committee","author":"Editor","date":"June 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court exonerated the charges of contravention of prescribing non-refundable participation fee levied on Liquidator of Corporate Debtor, however, he was found guilty of paying excess fees to BDO Restructuring Advisory LLP.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/25\/nclts-inherent-power-to-permit-liquidation-withdrawal\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":1},"title":"NCLT can invoke inherent powers to permit withdrawal of voluntary liquidation, when no third-party rights are affected: NCLT","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, initiation of the voluntary liquidation was a voluntary commercial decision taken by the shareholders. It is open to the shareholders, where no prejudice is caused to any stakeholder, to reconsider and reverse their decision, particularly when the process has not proceeded to an irreversible stage, such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLT's inherent power","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Media-12.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Media-12.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Media-12.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Media-12.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/liquidation-e-auction-successful-auction-purchaser-due-amount-attachment-assets-corporate-debtor-nclt-allowed-withdraw-return-instalment-nclat-partly-allowed-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":2},"title":"Successful Auction Purchaser can withdraw from e-Auction; NCLAT upheld refund of EMD and first instalment","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case challenging the Adjudicating Authority's order to withdraw from e-auction process and refund of EMD and first instalment, the Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority can allow the Successful Auction Purchaser to withdraw from e-auction process when the balance bid amount is due because of the attachment of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":250435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/29\/gratuity-dilemma-vis-a-vis-liquidation-process-under-the-ib-code\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":3},"title":"Gratuity Dilemma vis-\u00e0-vis Liquidation Process under the IB Code","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u2020 and Lavanya Jha\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 51","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Akaant Mittal&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Akaant Mittal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/akaant-mittal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-46.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-46.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-46.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-46.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-46.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/01\/nclt-jurisdiction-imposition-fine-suspended-directors-non-cooperation-ibc-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":4},"title":"NCLT can\u2019t impose fine on suspended directors for non-cooperation under Sections 19(2) or 34(3) of IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Adjudicating Authority erred in passing the impugned order, directing the imposition fine, overlooking the law of the land through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/13\/secured-creditor-has-right-to-choose-method-of-debt-realisation-not-obligated-to-rely-solely-on-liquidation-proceedings-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":233025,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT rules on Secured Creditor\u2019s right to choose method of debt realisation","author":"Ritu","date":"March 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT stated that since the IBC overrides the SARFAESI Act, the Liquidator ought not to prefer a petition, based on the SARFAESI Act, and therefore Liquidator\u2019s decision to classify the appellant as an unsecured financial creditor was illegal and invalid.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233025\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}