{"id":232886,"date":"2020-07-27T14:00:11","date_gmt":"2020-07-27T08:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232886"},"modified":"2020-07-31T11:35:50","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T06:05:50","slug":"ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Debabrata Dash JJ. disposed off the petition on merits.<\/p>\n

The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner is a registered cooperative society, involved in supply\/sale of different products including fertilizers, who participated in the e-auction made by the Steel Authority of India Limited, Rourkela Steel Plant for the purpose of sale of Ammonium Sulphate by depositing the required EMD. The auction was conducted and the petitioner\u2019s name appeared in the bid sheet under rank-1 being the sole bidder. Despite the petitioner being the successful bidder no supply of the stock was made instead another open sale dated 19-12-2019 was published by the opposite parties. Being apprehensive that in the subsequent open sale, the entire stock would be sold wholly to the detriment of the petitioner; bid was given by the petitioner for purchase of small quantity of Ammonium Sulphate. \u00a0Hence the instant writ of mandamus has been filed to command the opposite parties to deliver the stock and direct the opposite party to consider and dispose of the petitioner\u2019s representation dated 21-12-2019 as the action of the opposite party in holding the second auction is arbitrary and illegal.<\/p>\n

B. K. Mohanty and S S Rao, Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as there was no response towards representation dated 19.12.2019 given by the petitioner, it is clear that there was no prior intimation regarding cancellation of the first auction process been given and it is a fit case for judicial review in annulling the second auction and for restoration of the result of the first auction.<\/span><\/p>\n

B. Dasmohapatra and B.N Bhol, Counsel for the opposite parties highlighted the scope of writ jurisdiction in contractual dealings of the State. He further highlighted that in the first auction; the petitioner was the only participant and had applied for the quantity quoting the fixed bid price making the first auction not competitive at all. Hence the present case is not fir for judicial review.<\/p>\n

The Court after hearing both sides relied on the judgment titled Maa Binda Express Carrier v. North-East Frontier Railway<\/em> (2014) 3 SCC 760<\/a> and observed that there is a certain public interest at stake in the decision of cancellation of the first auction as petitioner being the sole participant in an auction reduces competition and hinders public interest. It also stated that judicial review of administrative action is intended to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality, unreasonableness, bias and malafides. Its purpose is to check whether choice or decision is made ‘lawfully’ and not to check whether choice or decision is \u2018sound\u2019.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, petitioner is estopped from questioning the validity\/legality of the cancellation of the first auction and the petition is disposed off. [Maa Sarala Multipurpose Co-operative Ltd. v. Steel Authority of India, 2020 SCC OnLine Ori 536<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-07-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[42727,2831,3042,7272],"class_list":["post-232886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-administrative-actions","tag-Auction","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-writ-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-\u2502-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-\u2502-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-27T08:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-31T06:05:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-27T08:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-31T06:05:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-\u2502-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety","og_description":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-\u2502-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-27T08:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-31T06:05:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/","name":"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-27T08:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-31T06:05:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/ori-hc-%e2%94%82-judicial-review-of-administrative-actions-to-be-done-only-if-it-suffers-from-vice-of-illegality-irrationality-or-procedural-impropriety\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Judicial review of administrative actions to be done only if it suffers from vice of illegality, Irrationality or Procedural Impropriety"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238125,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/chh-hc-extent-of-power-of-judicial-review-under-art-226-of-constitution-is-limited-in-case-of-tender-proceedings-judicial-restraint-to-be-exercised-in-administrative-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | Extent of Power of Judicial Review under Art. 226 of Constitution is limited in case of \u2018tender\u2019 proceedings; Judicial restraint to be exercised in administrative matters","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., dismissed the petition applying the principle of judicial restraint in administrative matters. The facts of the case are such that petitioner is an enterprise registered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (Development) Act, 2006,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/public-auction\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | \u201cEven after completion of public auction the highest bidder has no indefeasible right till the confirmation letter is issued\u201d; HC states","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Javed Iqbal Wani, J., had heard the instant petition challenging inaction on the part of respondent regarding allotment of auctioned property. The Bench stated, \u201cThe right to refuse the lowest or any other tender is always available to the government and even if a public\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/26\/hsvp-cancelled-auction-for-administrative-reasons-punjab-haryana-hc-sends-back-assign-reasons\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC ask Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran to assign reasons for cancelling auction of Gurugram plot","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It was alleged that HSVP exercised unfettered powers and cancelled the auction of the plot without providing any reason or jurisdiction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/31\/when-25-of-the-bid-is-already-paid-whether-failure-to-deposit-the-remaining-75-empowers-the-bank-to-direct-forfeiture-of-money-even-when-bank-suffered-no-loss-in-subsequent-auction-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":3},"title":"When 25% of the bid is already paid, whether failure to deposit the remaining 75% empowers the Bank to direct forfeiture of money even when Bank suffered no loss in subsequent auction? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., directed the Indian Bank to refund the 25% auction consideration forfeited by the bank after cancelling the proposed auction. The Bench stated that since no loss had been accrued by the bank in the subsequent auction, it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266139,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/29\/person-being-the-highest-bidder-deposits-sale-amount-for-auction-property-and-obtains-injunction-against-municipality-sc-declares-the-sale-non-est-for-lacking-government-sanction\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":4},"title":"Person being the highest bidder deposits sale amount for auction property and obtains injunction against Municipality; SC declares the sale non-est for lacking government sanction","author":"Editor","date":"April 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta* and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ., reversed concurrent findings of Trial Court and Punjab and Haryana High Court by setting aside mandatory injunction granted against the Municipal Committee. The Bench held that merely being the highest bidder in auction will not entitle one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/liquidation-e-auction-successful-auction-purchaser-due-amount-attachment-assets-corporate-debtor-nclt-allowed-withdraw-return-instalment-nclat-partly-allowed-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":232886,"position":5},"title":"Successful Auction Purchaser can withdraw from e-Auction; NCLAT upheld refund of EMD and first instalment","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case challenging the Adjudicating Authority's order to withdraw from e-auction process and refund of EMD and first instalment, the Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority can allow the Successful Auction Purchaser to withdraw from e-auction process when the balance bid amount is due because of the attachment of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}