{"id":232673,"date":"2020-07-22T16:53:40","date_gmt":"2020-07-22T11:23:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232673"},"modified":"2020-07-31T12:29:01","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T06:59:01","slug":"bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I Chagla, JJ., asked State of Maharashtra to file their response on the following:<\/p>\n

\n

“how a physically fit persons who is 65 years or above is expected to live a dignified life if he is not allowed to go out and earn his livelihood?”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Petitioner sought quashment of the condition appearing in Government Guidelines dated 30-05-2020 stating that “Any cast\/crew members above the age of 65 years will not be allowed at the site.”<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Petitioner submitted that he does not have any other source of livelihood and is solely dependent on such jobs in the film studios. Though he is physically fit, he is not allowed to go to the studios and participate in shooting for earning his livelihood.<\/p>\n

He additionally submits that if he is prevented from participating in any of the activities during the shootings, he won’t be able to survive with dignity and self respect.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Advocate appearing for the State had informed the Court that the guidelines also provides that when possible, castings should be done remotely via Facetime, Zoom, Skype, etc.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

“…actors performing small roles are required to go to the studios and request for work to enable them to have their two meals, and no Producer\/Director is going to shoot their role via Facetime, Zoom, Skype etc.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bench in view of the above, directed the respondents to interalia file its affidavit explaining how a physically fit persons who is 65 years or above is expected to live a dignified life if he is not allowed to go out and earn his livelihood.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Following are the questions on which the respondents shall set out their response in the affidavit:<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Whether any data\/reports\/statistics were taken into consideration before issuing the impugned Guidelines restraining any cast\/crew members above the age of 65 years from attending the studios\/shooting sites;<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Whether a similar rule is made applicable to individuals who are 65 years and above and are travelling by trains\/buses\/aircrafts etc.;<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Whether a similar rule is made applicable to the employers\/staff who are currently attending shops\/private offices;<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Whether a similar rule is made applicable to the individuals (approximately 30) who are allowed to attend funerals or marriage reception\/s etc.<\/p>\n

Matter to be listed on 24-07-2020. [Pramod Pandey v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 818<\/b><\/a> , decided on 21-07-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I Chagla, JJ., asked State of Maharashtra to file their response on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[42656,2518,39924,32080,32051,38434],"class_list":["post-232673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-65-years-age","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-covid-19","tag-dignified-life","tag-livelihood","tag-state-of-maharashtra"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I Chagla, JJ., asked State of Maharashtra to file their response on the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-22T11:23:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-31T06:59:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-22T11:23:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-31T06:59:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I Chagla, JJ., asked State of Maharashtra to file their response on the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-22T11:23:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-31T06:59:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/","name":"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-22T11:23:40+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-31T06:59:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/22\/bom-hc-how-a-physically-fit-person-of-65-years-age-or-above-is-expected-to-live-a-dignified-life-if-not-allowed-to-go-out-earn-livelihood-maharashtra-govt-to-respond\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | How a physically fit person of 65 years age or above is expected to live a dignified life if not allowed to go out & earn livelihood? Maharashtra Govt to respond"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/bom-hc-age-based-prohibition-in-only-film-industry-television-ott-constitutes-an-unreasonable-restriction\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Absolute prohibition from being present at the site of shooting over persons above age of 65 years who earn livelihood from film\/television industry, quashed in light of being discriminatory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I. Chagla, JJ., quashed and set aside the unreasonable restriction placed by the State of Maharashtra on prohibiting the actors, crew members, etc. who are above the age of 65 years from being present at the site of the shooting of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240419,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/10\/bom-hc-sexual-harassment-of-a-woman-at-a-place-where-she-is-working-to-earn-her-livelihood-is-a-disgrace-meted-out-to-her-at-the-hands-of-abuser\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Sexual harassment of a woman at a place, where she is working to earn her livelihood is a disgrace meted out to her at the hands of abuser","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and N.J. Jamadar, JJ., observed a matter wherein an adolescent girl who was employed as a maid to earn a livelihood was sexually harassed by the son of her owner. Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/11\/anticipatory-bail-of-a-petitioner-residing-in-india-but-earning-his-livelihood-from-france-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":2},"title":"Anticipatory bail of a petitioner residing in India but earning his livelihood from France allowed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of B.A. Patil, J. while hearing a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 allowed anticipatory bail of the petitioner since there was no material against him in the case. Brief factual background of the matter was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":342020,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":3},"title":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe sweep of the right to life conferred by Article 21 of Constitution of India is wide and far reaching. An important facet of that right is right to livelihood, because no person can live without the means of living, i.e., the means of the livelihood.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/bom-hc-if-the-wife-is-earning-something-for-livelihood-can-the-same-be-a-ground-to-refuse-alimony-under-s-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-read-courts-ruling-taking-reiterating-scs-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | If the wife is earning something for livelihood, can the same be a ground to refuse alimony under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act? Read Court’s ruling reiterating SC’s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Mangesh S. Patil, J., in the present application directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs 10,000 towards alimony pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner-wife has impugned the order passed by the Family Court, Judge wherein her application was rejected in which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318609,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-grants-protection-to-19-years-old-couple-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":232673,"position":5},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court advises youngsters to apply discretion while opting choices; grants protection to 19-years old couple","author":"Ritu","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court expresses concern on the choices that the youngsters are making these days and advice the need for discretion and awareness of societal implications.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232673\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}