{"id":232586,"date":"2020-07-21T15:57:29","date_gmt":"2020-07-21T10:27:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232586"},"modified":"2020-07-21T15:57:29","modified_gmt":"2020-07-21T10:27:29","slug":"ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/","title":{"rendered":"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): <\/b>The Bench of Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member) while deciding the issues revolving around purchase of a residential flat, rejected the instant appeal preferred by Magnolia Infrastructure, after being aggrieved by the Order passed by the State Commission to hand over the constructed property to the complainants.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">The complainants entered into a MoU with the appellant, for the purchase of a residential flat for a consideration of Rs 40,26,200 by paying an initial amount of Rs 12,45,183. According to the agreement, the area of the flat had to be 1114 sq. feet and the possession was to be handed over by June 2015, with a grace period of six months available to the builder. However, the size of the flat was contested to be smaller than the agreed size by the complainant. The complainant further stated that and the construction of the flat was incomplete, therefore, the complainant went to the State Commission, who found these contestations to be genuine and legible and ordered the builders to pay the compensation for the alleged violation of the agreement. The appellants (builders) were represented by Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh and Barun Prasad, while the respondent (complainant) appeared for himself before the Commission. The counsel for the appellant challenged the State Commission\u2019s Order by contesting the area of the flat to be of the agreed size and the certificate\/completion certificate of the flat allotted to the complainant. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">Commission decided that the area measurement conducted by the person appointed by the State Commission was correct and that there was actual shortage in the area of the flat as the constructed flat\u2019s size was found to be 997 sq. feet. For the second issue, the Commission observed that the flat was already constructed and lying vacant thereby serving no purpose. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">Since, the State Commission is yet to verify that whether Rajarhat Municipal Corporation is competent to issue the occupancy certificate and whether had actually issued the said occupancy certificate dated 21-07-2014, the Commission held that the possession of the residential flat should be handed over to the complainant till this question is decided by the State Commission. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">[Mangolia Infrastructure Development Ltd. v. Sandipan Santra, FA No. 2084 of 2018, decided on 14-07-2020]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench of Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member) while deciding the issues revolving around purchase of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[8671,36518,42636,29863,42637],"class_list":["post-232586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-builder","tag-consumer-disputes","tag-residential-flat","tag-state-commission","tag-third-party-interest"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench of Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member) while deciding the issues revolving around purchase of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-21T10:27:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/\",\"name\":\"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-21T10:27:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench of Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member) while deciding the issues revolving around purchase of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-21T10:27:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/","name":"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-21T10:27:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/21\/ncdrc-builder-directed-to-deliver-peaceful-and-vacant-possession-of-flat-to-complainant-no-third-party-interest-in-flat-till-consumer-dispute-decided-by-state-commission\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCDRC | Builder directed to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of flat to complainant; No third party interest in flat till consumer dispute decided by State Commission"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":35851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/16\/non-resident-indians-can-also-purchase-house-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":0},"title":"Non-resident Indians can also purchase house in India","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0\u201cIt cannot be made a \u2018rule of thumb\u2019 that every NRI cannot own a property in India.\u00a0NRIs do come to India, every now and then. Most of the NRIs have to return to their native land. Each NRI wants a house in India.\u00a0 He is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/29\/builder-buyer-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC | Builder unilaterally, high-handedly cancels sale agreement on not handing over timely possession: Commission decides builder-buyer dispute, levies interest to be paid by builder","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Coram of C. Viswanath (Presiding Member) and Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya (Member) decided an issue with regard to handing over of possession of flat and cancellation of sale agreement in a builder -- buyer dispute. Arun Kedia (HUF), Arun Kedia and Sabita Kedia\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/30\/ncdrc-buyer-cannot-be-made-to-wait-indefinitely-for-possession-of-flat-when-the-entire-consideration-amount-has-been-made\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC | Buyer cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of flat when the entire consideration amount has been made","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0R.K. Agrawal (President) while deciding the present consumer case held that, \"Wherever the Builder commits a particular date or time frame for completion of the construction and offering possession to the Buyer, they must necessarily honour the commitment made by them.\" In the present matter,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/law-on-builder-buyer-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":3},"title":"Law on Builder-Buyer Dispute | 9-years delay in delivering possession of apartment: Read NCDRC\u2019s decision on refund and interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Can Buyer be asked to wait indefinitely for possession of flat even after 9-years of delay?","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/15\/ncdrc-slams-compensation-on-builder-not-giving-possession-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":4},"title":"Builder not giving possession on time; NCDRC slams with compensation for delay in delivery of possession","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In another case of delayed possession of flats by builder in Gurugram, NCDRC directed the builder to compensate the homebuyers for delay and differences of brochure and builder homebuyer agreement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-744.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-744.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-744.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-744.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256955,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/11\/does-an-arbitration-clause-in-an-agreement-bar-consumer-forums-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":232586,"position":5},"title":"Does an arbitration clause in an agreement bar consumer forum\u2019s jurisdiction? NCDRC answers relying on SC decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Coram of Justice R.K. Agrawal (President) and Dr S.M. Kantikar (Member)reiterated that the presence of an arbitration clause in the agreement does not bar the jurisdiction of consumer fora. Grievance of the Buyer Complainants alleged that the Project in which they had booked their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232586\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}