{"id":232522,"date":"2020-07-20T14:59:37","date_gmt":"2020-07-20T09:29:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232522"},"modified":"2020-07-24T12:45:50","modified_gmt":"2020-07-24T07:15:50","slug":"kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can&#8217;t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, CJ and M. Nagaprasanna, J., while addressing a matter held that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath cannot be said to be an essential part of any religion or religious practice which can be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Purpose for filing the present petition was pointing out the failure of BBMP to demolish the unauthorized temple constructed on a footpath more particularly described in the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BBMP had assured the Court to remove the illegal structure of the temple on the footpath.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">But it has be noted that till today, the illegal structure of the temple has not been removed notwithstanding the grant of time on several occasions.<\/p>\n<p>On 4th March, 2020 I.A. No. 1 of 2020 was filed, wherein the Court observed that,<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 2\">\n<div class=\"section\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8220;applicant was a member of the Residents Welfare Association. As a citizen, the applicant should be interested in ensuring that all the structures in the area are constructed after obtaining due permission from BBMP. A residents\u2019 Association cannot support the illegality especially, when the subject illegal construction carried out is on a footpath. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>The duty of the citizens is to assist the Authorities <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">like BBMP to ensure that no illegal constructions come up and the same are demolished. The footpaths are meant for walking by citizens and not for constructing temples. Therefore, I.A.No.1\/2020 is rejected.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 4\">\n<div class=\"section\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution of India does not extend to offering worship or prayers at each and every place. Surely, the fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked for protecting an illegal structure of a temple which is on a footpath.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath cannot be said to be an essential part of any religion or religious practice which can be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that the duty of the citizens is to see that no illegal structure and especially, illegal religious structure comes up in their locality. But they want to protect a temple which has come up on a footpath.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">We do not think that any god or religion will support an illegal religious structure which is on a footpath. A religious structure cannot become an obstacle on a footpath which is meant for walking.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 5\">\n<div class=\"section\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>After one applications of the residents was rejected, this is the second application for intervention which cannot be entertained. In the application it is claimed that the temple was in established in 1854.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the above, Court stated that the photographs of the structure clearly shows that the statement was false and the structure appeared to be a newly constructed structure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court rejected the application and saddled them with exemplary costs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petition was adjourned till 30-07-2020.[ Sanathana Kalakshetra v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k8viu91Q\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Kar 871<\/b><\/a> , decided on 14-07-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, CJ and M. Nagaprasanna, J., while addressing a matter held that, &#8220;right to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[41383,42615,42616,42614,3551],"class_list":["post-232522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-25-of-constitution-of-india","tag-bbmp","tag-footpath","tag-illegal-religious-structure","tag-temple"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can&#039;t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can&#039;t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, CJ and M. Nagaprasanna, J., while addressing a matter held that, &#8220;right to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-20T09:29:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-24T07:15:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can't be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-20T09:29:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-24T07:15:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can&#8217;t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can't be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can't be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25","og_description":"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, CJ and M. Nagaprasanna, J., while addressing a matter held that, &#8220;right to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-20T09:29:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-24T07:15:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/","name":"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can't be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-20T09:29:37+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-24T07:15:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/20\/kar-hc-right-to-construct-unauthorized-temple-and-that-also-on-a-footpath-cant-be-an-essential-part-of-any-religion-which-can-be-protected-under-article-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can&#8217;t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292486,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/delhi-high-court-upholds-demolition-of-55year-old-kali-mata-mandir-at-mayapuri-chowk-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":0},"title":"PWD, Religious Committee decides to demolish 55-year-old Kali Mata Mandir at Mayapuri Chowk; Delhi High Court refuses to interfere","author":"Arunima","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court directed that the PWD is free to carry out the demolition and remove the unauthorized construction after 20-05-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":163404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/ban-entry-women-sabrimala-temple-matter-referred-constitution-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":1},"title":"Ban on entry of women in Sabrimala Temple: Matter referred to Constitution bench","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the issue relating to ban of female devotees between the age group of 10 to 50 from entering the Sabrimala Temple of Lord Ayyappa in Kerala, the 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and R. Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan, JJ referred the matter to a Constitution bench.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/23\/yamuna-river-floodplain-zealously-protected-from-encroachment-unauthorized-constructions-dhc-upholds-demolition\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Yamuna River Floodplain must be zealously protected from encroachment and unauthorised construction\u2019: Delhi HC upholds demolition of temple near Yamuna Bank","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is not even a single scrap of a document placed on record by the appellant\/society to show any kind of legitimacy it exercises, either over the land or the illegal structure built thereon.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249699,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/12\/right-of-footpath\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Footpaths are not for campaigns and protests; HC asks State to explain steps taken to avoid encroachment of pedestrians\u2019 right to footpath\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While addressing the issue of encroachments of footpaths for the purpose of holding assemblies and protests, the Division Bench of Anil K. Narendran and Ziyad Rahman A.A., JJ., stated that, \u201cFootpaths are not intended for the purpose of holding campaigns, demonstrations, etc., by political parties and other\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/palani-temple-dispute-non-hindus-cannot-allowed-inside-temple-without-written-undertaking-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":4},"title":"[Palani Temple dispute] Non-Hindus cannot be allowed inside temple without written undertaking: Madras HC issues directions","author":"Apoorva","date":"January 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Hindus also have fundamental right to profess and practice their religion freely and propagate their religion without interfering in their way of practice. Therefore, the Hindus have right to maintain their temples as per their customs, practices and Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department is having duty to protect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-against-demolition-pracheen-shiv-mandir-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":232522,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Lord Shiva does not need our protection\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses petition against demolition of Pracheen Shiv Mandir","author":"Arunima","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cLord Shiva does not need our protection; rather, we, the people, seek his protection and blessings. There could be no iota of doubt that Lord Shiva would be happier if the Yamuna Riverbed and the flood plains areas are cleared of all encroachments and unauthorized construction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}