{"id":232260,"date":"2020-07-15T10:00:52","date_gmt":"2020-07-15T04:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232260"},"modified":"2020-07-17T13:17:01","modified_gmt":"2020-07-17T07:47:01","slug":"hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/b>Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. dismissed the petition on the merits of the case.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">The facts of the case are that on 22-08-2019 a police team laid a <i>nakka <\/i>at Una to Mehatpur Road and apprehended a Tata Safari in which the driver and a female namely Mahinder Singh Patiyal<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>and Neelam were caught with 11 bags of white cement but could not give any satisfactory reply. Police on further search found cannabis weighing 2.630 grams covered in an iron sheet inside a bag hidden under the reserve tyre. A mobile phone along with currency notes amounting to Rs 92,820 were also recovered. Mahinder Singh Patiyal and the female petitioner were arrested. It was revealed to the police that many cases under NDPS Act and Excise Act have been registered against accused Mahinder Singh Patiyal and in one of the case he has been convicted and a case under Sections 498A and 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC has also been registered against him. The present petition has been filed for grant of bail by the female apprehended namely Neelam.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">The counsel N.K. Thakur and Divya Raj Singh representing the petitioners argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It was further argued that the petitioner is permanent resident of District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh and neither in a position to tamper with the prosecution evidence nor in a position to flee from justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">The counsel S.C. Sharma, P.K. Bhatti and Kamal Kishore representing the respondents stated that the petitioner was found involved in a serious offence, huge quantity of <i>charas <\/i>was recovered from the joint possession of the petitioner and co-accused Mahinder Singh Patiyal and the case being at initial stage she may tamper with the prosecution evidence and may also flee from justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">High Court on hearing the arguments on both sides observed that considering the quantity of recovered contraband, i.e., 2 kgs 630 grams, which is a commercial quantity and the manner in which it was concealed in the vehicle rules out the possibility that the petitioner was unaware about the recovered contraband. The Court further stated that as the trial is in the initial stage of investigation, petitioner has the opportunity to tamper with evidence and flee from justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">In view of the above facts and arguments, the instant petition is dismissed and bail refused. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">[Neelam v. State of Himachal Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h5Db1UR9\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 937<\/b><\/a> , decided on 10-07-2020]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,21061],"class_list":["post-232260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-ndps-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-15T04:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-17T07:47:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-15T04:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-17T07:47:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act","og_description":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-15T04:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-17T07:47:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/","name":"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-15T04:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-17T07:47:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/hp-hc-bail-refused-on-grounds-of-contraband-being-of-commercial-quantity-under-s-20-of-ndps-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/03\/unlikely-to-be-implicated-multiple-fir-punjab-haryana-hc-refuses-bail-ndps-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Unlikely to be implicated in multiple FIRs at whims and fancies of Investigating Agency\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC refuses bail in NDPS matter","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Deciding for similar facts, the Supreme Court had granted anticipatory bail, as cited by Punjab and Haryana High Court in the instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":180904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/bail-granted-due-non-compliance-procedure-provisions-ndps-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":1},"title":"Bail granted due to non-compliance of procedure and provisions of NDPS Act","author":"Saba","date":"January 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 439 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Budihal R.B., J., enlarged the petitioners on bail based on the finding that the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, were not complied with by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":378592,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/17\/important-ndps-judgments-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":2},"title":"Top NDPS Judgments of 2025: Bail, Detention, Evidence &amp; Procedural Safeguards","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"March 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A consolidated look at how Supreme Court and High Courts interpreted the NDPS Act in 2025 \u2014 from bail and procedural safeguards to detention, evidence standards and evolving issues around possession, quantity, FSL reports, and foreign nationals.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NDPS judgments 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":149121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-grants-bail-in-absence-of-prima-facie-case-for-an-offence-under-ndps-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":3},"title":"Karnataka HC grants bail in absence of prima facie case for an offence under NDPS Act","author":"Saba","date":"August 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a criminal petition filed under Section 439 of CrPC, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail, a Single Judge Bench of Rathnakala, J. granted bail to the petitioner as no prima facie offence could be made out against him under the NDPS\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":320420,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/sc-sets-aside-conviction-based-statement-before-ndps-official-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":4},"title":"SC sets aside 21-year-old conviction based solely on inadmissible statement made before NDPS official under Section 67 of NDPS Act","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) 16 SCC 31, it was held that officers authorised under Section 53 of the NDPS Act were \u2018police officers\u2019 and the statements made to them under Section 67 were inadmissible in evidence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"statement before NDPS official inadmissible","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/statement-before-NDPS-official-inadmissible.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/statement-before-NDPS-official-inadmissible.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/statement-before-NDPS-official-inadmissible.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/statement-before-NDPS-official-inadmissible.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/fsl-report-under-ndps-act-affirms-seizure-officers-presumption-must-be-obtained-on-priority-preferably-within-60-days-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":232260,"position":5},"title":"FSL report must be obtained on priority, preferably within 60 days: Rajasthan High Court grants bail","author":"Ritu","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the investigation under NDPS Act is to be completed within 60 days or 180 days is totally dependent upon FSL report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}