{"id":232120,"date":"2020-07-13T11:03:47","date_gmt":"2020-07-13T05:33:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232120"},"modified":"2023-07-19T09:58:16","modified_gmt":"2023-07-19T04:28:16","slug":"corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","title":{"rendered":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?"},"content":{"rendered":"

I. <\/b>Introduction <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

1.The Lok Sabha, on March 17, 2020[1]<\/strong><\/span>, introduced the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020 (the Bill) to decriminalise various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (the 2013 Act). In the first part of this two-part series, we will provide an analysis of the doctrine of corporate criminal liability and its evolution in India. In the second part, we will deal with details of the Bill and its significance in commencing a new chapter in the development of corporate criminal liability in India.<\/span><\/p>\n

II.<\/b>Evolution of corporate criminal liability particularly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

2.The concept of corporate criminal liability developed in the Anglo-American tradition of common law through a process of accretion that lacked any conscious effort or a direction. Initially, the corporations were considered incapable of committing crimes, but with globalisation and liberalisation came a shift in the societal stance wherein corporations were seen as being involved in committing (almost all<\/i>) white collar crimes[2]<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. In the early 1700s, the development of corporate criminal liability faced four main obstacles[3]<\/span><\/strong>:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

a. Attributing acts to a juristic person[4]<\/span><\/strong>;<\/span><\/p>\n

b.Belief that companies could not possess the moral culpability necessary to commit intentional crimes[5]<\/span><\/strong>;<\/span><\/p>\n

c. Ultra vires doctrine, under which courts would not hold corporations accountable for acts, such as crimes, that were not provided for in their charters[6]<\/span><\/strong>; and<\/span><\/p>\n

d.Understanding of the extant criminal procedure, wherein procedure without the accused physically coming before the court was unknown[7]<\/span><\/strong>. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

4. Criminal liability stands on the basic rule of \u2018actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea\u2019<\/i> i.e. an act is wrongful only when it is done with a wrongful state of mind. However, a corporation neither has a mind which can possess knowledge or intention, nor does it have hands to carry out its intentions. To address this issue, it is essential to understand that the original application of both civil and criminal liability to corporate entities were derived primarily from the ancient common law tort doctrine which says masters had \u201cvicarious<\/i>\u201d liability for the wrongful actions of their servants[8]<\/span><\/strong>. As a result, the courts were soon willing to hold corporations criminally liable for almost all wrongs except rape, murder, bigamy, and other crimes of malicious intent[9]<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

5. The common criminal law also took the position that, in general, there could be no vicarious criminal responsibility i.e. a person could not be deemed to be guilty of a criminal offence committed by another[10]<\/span><\/strong>. Over a period of time, application of this rule became subject to exception on the basis of specific provisions in the statutes extending liability to others. <\/span><\/p>\n

6. In the United Kingdom, the House of Lords while hearing the case of Tesco Supermarkets Ltd<\/i> v. Nattrass<\/i>[11]<\/strong><\/span> held that an employee was not a part of the \u2018directing mind\u2019 of the corporation and, therefore, his conduct was not attributable to the act of corporation. However, in\u00a0 <\/span>Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v. Securities Commission<\/i>[12]<\/strong><\/span> the Privy Council ruled that a company can be held liable for the crimes of its senior personnel, committed without the knowledge of the company. The identification theory imposes vicarious liability of an organisation for the acts committed by agents of the organisation and was identified in the above two judgments. <\/span><\/p>\n

7. Both the American standards i.e. vicarious liability and Respondent Superior <\/i>for holding organisations criminally liable employ the \u2018identification\u2019 approach pioneered in England. Respondent Superior<\/i> is the broader of the two standards. Derived from agency principles in tort law, it provides that a corporation may be held criminally liable for the acts of any of its agents [who] (1) commits a crime, (2) within the scope of employment, (3) with the intent to benefit the corporation[13]<\/span><\/strong>. This standard is quite broad, permitting organisational liability for the act of any agent, even the lowest level employee[14]<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/b>III. Development of corporate criminal liability in India<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/b>A. Judicial Interpretation <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

8. The special vicarious liability doctrine adopted in India emanates from the common law principle which enables the courts to hold the directing minds responsible for the actions and affairs of the company[15]<\/span><\/strong>. <\/span>In\u00a0 <\/span>Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation<\/i>[16]<\/strong><\/span>,<\/i> the Supreme Court, while adopting the position from Tesco Supermarkets Limited, <\/i>held that a company cannot be criminally liable for the actions of its employees. Therefore, there is no special vicarious liability in criminal law without a specific statutory exception. However, this position was overturned in\u00a0 <\/span>Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement<\/i>[17]<\/strong><\/span>, <\/i>where the Supreme Court at the outset rejected the idea that the company is immune from criminal prosecution where custodial sentence is mandatory and observed that the company is liable to be prosecuted and punished for criminal offences. <\/span><\/p>\n

9. Thereafter, in the landmark case of Iridium India Telecom Limited v. Motorola Inc.<\/i>[18]<\/strong><\/span>, <\/i>the Supreme Court observed that corporate houses can no longer claim immunity from criminal prosecution on the ground that they are not capable of possessing mens rea<\/i>. Therefore, the actions of the directors of the accused company were directly linked to the actions of the company itself, thereby holding the corporation criminally liable both under common law and statutory law. It is an admitted position in India that despite being a juristic person, a company is liable for its actions and inactions that result in commission of an offence punishable under law.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/b>B. Corporate criminal liability under the Companies Act<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

10. In India, the corporate criminal liability is imposed on the corporations through various legislations such as the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2013 to hold the company and the key managerial personnel (KMP) responsible for the illegal acts of the corporations. Considering that the Companies Act, 1956 (the 1956 Act) and the 2013 Act are legislations solely for the governance of the corporations, the study of the corporate criminal liability as provided for in these legislations become relevant.<\/span><\/p>\n

11. Corporate criminal liability under the 1956 Act was based on the principle of strict vicarious liability, as discussed in the section above. However, the threshold of corporate criminal liability was increased under the 2013 Act by introducing stricter provisions to hold officers and directors vicariously liable on account of their designation, scope of employment and responsibility irrespective of any requirement to prove their involvement in commissioning of the crime. <\/span><\/p>\n

12. The 2013 Act streamlines the manner in which corporate criminal liability is to be imposed on corporations. It specifies that the KMP would be considered as defaulting \u201cofficers\u201d. The officers under the Companies Act, 2013 have been categorised as following:<\/span><\/p>\n

(i) KMP including managing director, whole time directors, chief executive directors, chief financial officers and company secretaries; <\/span><\/p>\n

(ii) personnel reporting to the KMP that are responsible for maintaining, filing or distribution accounts and records and participating in actively taking certain actions or inactions; <\/span><\/p>\n

(iii) personnel responsible for \u2018maintaining accounts and records\u2019;<\/span><\/p>\n

(iv) directors possessing the knowledge of any default committed by the other officers on behalf of the company through participation in board meetings or being in receipt of any board proceedings; and<\/span><\/p>\n

(v) <\/span>personnel not involved in the day-to-day affairs of the company but involved in the transfer of shares such as share transfer agents, registrars and the merchant bankers to the issue or transfer of shares. <\/span><\/p>\n

13.The existing standards under the 2013 Act are inconsistent with the principles of criminal law as it holds the officers and personnel criminally liable merely on account of their designation and there specific actions or inactions that indicate that they possessed knowledge of the crime while they may not be actively involved in the commission of the crime. It is relevant to note the imposition of stricter punishments for offences committed by corporations was introduced in the 2013 Act with the objective of ensuring \u2018deterrence\u2019 on the companies. However, the imposition of stricter liability has made the corporations very vulnerable, thus greatly hampering the ease of doing business.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/b>IV. Conclusion<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

14. While corporations have been a blessing to the economy, it is crucial that for progress and development of the society, the laws governing such corporations strike at the root cause of the crimes committed. While doing so, the legislations should also incentivise corporations to carry out their business with ease, and by freeing the directing mindsof the fear of being criminally liable merely on account of their designation. It is imperative for the legislation, while combating crimes, to strike a balance between functioning of the society and the overall benefit of the economy.<\/span><\/p>\n

15. Therefore, there is a pressing need to dilute the corporate criminal liability, imposed specifically under the 2013 Act. The unrealistic standards prescribed under the said legislation needs to be watered down to a certain extent for the purpose of enhancing the ease of doing business. With this objective, the legislators introduced the Bill to decriminalise various provisions of the 2013 Act. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

* Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas<\/span><\/p>\n

** Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas<\/span><\/p>\n

*** Senior Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2020Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2021Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas<\/span><\/p>\n

[1]<\/span><\/strong> Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020<\/a> [Bill No. 88 of 2020]<\/span><\/p>\n

[2] <\/span><\/strong>Thomas J. Bernard, The Historical Development of Corporate Criminal Liability, 22 Criminology<\/i> 3 (1984).<\/span><\/p>\n

[3]<\/span><\/strong> John C. Coffee, Jr., Corporate Criminal Responsibility, in <\/i>1 Encyclopaedia of Crime and Justice<\/i> 253, 253 (Sanford H. Kadish ed., 1983)<\/span><\/p>\n

[4]<\/span><\/strong> Coffee, supra <\/i>note 3, at 253<\/span><\/p>\n

[5]<\/span><\/strong> Ibid<\/p>\n

[6]<\/span><\/strong> L.H. Leigh, The Criminal Liability of Corporations in English Law 1-12 (1969) (discussing the development of English corporate criminal liability).<\/span><\/p>\n

[7]<\/span><\/strong> Ibid<\/p>\n

[8]<\/span><\/strong> Ibid<\/p>\n

[9]<\/span><\/strong> Richard S. Gruner, Corporate Crime and Sentencing <\/i> \u00a7 1.9.2, at 52-55 (1994)<\/span><\/p>\n

[10]<\/span><\/strong> Matthew Goode, Corporate Criminal Liability<\/i>, Australian Govt. Publications, available at <\/span>http:\/\/www.aic.gov.au\/medialibrary\/publications\/proceedings\/26\/goode.pdf<\/span><\/p>\n

[11] <\/span><\/strong>[1972] AC 153<\/span><\/a> \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[12]<\/span><\/strong> [1995] 2 AC 500<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[13]<\/span><\/strong> United States v. A&P Trucking Co., 358 U.S. 121, 124-27 (1958)<\/span><\/p>\n

[14]<\/span><\/strong> Corporate Criminal Responsibility-American Standards of Corporate Criminal Liability; available at<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/law.jrank.org\/pages\/744\/Corporate-Criminal-Responsibility-American-standards-corporate-criminal-liability.html<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[15]<\/span><\/strong> Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v. Nattrass<\/span>, <\/i>[1972] AC 153<\/span><\/a> \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[16]<\/span><\/strong> (2015) 4 SCC 609<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

[17]<\/span><\/strong> Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2005) 4 SCC 530<\/span><\/p>\n

[18]<\/span><\/strong> (<\/a>2011) 1 SCC 74<\/a> \u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Ankoosh Mehta*, Smruti Shah**, Neham Tayal***, Durga Agarwal\u2020, King Dungerwal\u2021<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":198351,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30936,20271],"tags":[27634,42471,30015,42127,42470],"class_list":["post-232120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cam","category-experts_corner","tag-companies-act","tag-corporate-criminal-liability","tag-corporations","tag-criminal-liability","tag-legal-fiction"],"yoast_head":"\nCorporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator? | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Smruti Shah**, Neham Tayal***, Durga Agarwal\u2020, King Dungerwal\u2021\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-13T05:33:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-19T04:28:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/\",\"name\":\"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator? | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-13T05:33:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-19T04:28:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator? | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?","og_description":"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Smruti Shah**, Neham Tayal***, Durga Agarwal\u2020, King Dungerwal\u2021","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-13T05:33:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-19T04:28:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/","name":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator? | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-13T05:33:47+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-19T04:28:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/corporations-legal-fiction-or-an-unborn-predator\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Corporations: Legal Fiction or An Unborn Predator?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":250575,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/companies-amendment-act-2020-a-refreshing-change\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":0},"title":"Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 \u2013 A Refreshing Change","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Smruti Shah**, Neham Tayal***, Durga Agarwal\u2020, King Dungerwal\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 52","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/29\/ways-and-means-to-strengthen-corporate-governance\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":1},"title":"Ways and Means to Strengthen Corporate Governance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner and Abhisar Vidyarthi, Student Researcher, Corp Comm Legal Cite as: (2019) PL (CL) April 76","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CORP.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CORP.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CORP.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CORP.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CORP.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/section-138-ni-act-proceeding-a-civil-sheep-in-a-criminal-wolfs-clothing-quasi-criminal-proceedings-against-corporate-debtor-covered-under-section-14\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":2},"title":"‘Section 138 NI Act proceeding a \u201ccivil sheep\u201d in a \u201ccriminal wolf\u2019s\u201d clothing’; quasi criminal proceedings against corporate debtor covered under Section 14(1)(a) IBC : SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA Section 138 proceeding can be said to be a \u201ccivil sheep\u201d in a \u201ccriminal wolf\u2019s\u201d clothing, as it is the interest of the victim that is sought to be protected, the larger interest of the State being subsumed in the victim alone moving a court in cheque bouncing cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/initiation-ibc-proceedings-does-not-absolve-company-director-signatories-of-criminal-liability-under-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-supreme-court-legal-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":3},"title":"Initiation of IBC proceedings does not absolve Company Directors\/Signatories of criminal liability under Section 138 NI Act: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the scope of nature of proceedings under the two Acts are quite different and would not intercede each other.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257078,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/13\/inadequacies-of-the-extant-liability-regime-for-independent-directors-in-india-and-the-need-for-reform\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":4},"title":"Analysing the Inadequacies of the Extant Liability Regime for Independent Directors in India and the Need for Reform","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vaishnavi Srivastava\u2020 and Jagrati Maru\u2020\u2020 \u00a0","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-115.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-115.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-115.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-115.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-115.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/01\/corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026-introduced-in-lok-sabha\/","url_meta":{"origin":232120,"position":5},"title":"Strengthening Corporate Governance and Compliance: Highlights of the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026","author":"Shubhi","date":"April 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 was introduced in Lok Sabha to propose wide-ranging reforms to the Companies Act, 2013 and the LLP Act, 2008, focusing on decriminalisation, ease of doing business, improved governance, and compliance rationalisation.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Corporate-Laws-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Corporate-Laws-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Corporate-Laws-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Corporate-Laws-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232120\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/198351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}