{"id":232117,"date":"2020-07-13T09:59:27","date_gmt":"2020-07-13T04:29:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=232117"},"modified":"2020-07-31T12:46:04","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T07:16:04","slug":"m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Shailendra Shukla, J., while addressing a anticipatory bail application, held that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8220;&#8230;applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 is only against the husband and not in-laws.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present anticipatory bail application was filed under Section 428 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as the applicant&#8217;s were apprehending their arrest for the offence punishable under Section 498-A Penal Code, 1860, Section 3\/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 3\/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to some dispute, complainant after her Nikah returned back to her parental house, further the complainant submitted that her husband on 29th March, 2020 pronounced &#8216;Talaq&#8217; thrice on telephone, thereafter an FIR was lodged against him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for objector and State both submitted that after the Nikah when the complainant got pregnant her mother-in-law started alleging that complainant got pregnant much earlier and the child doesn&#8217;t belong to her son along with this, she also started asking for money saying that complainant did not give enough dowry to the applicants.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that the applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 is only against the husband and not in-laws.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further the Court noted that there was no physical cruelty , it appeared that early pregnancy became the cause of dispute and as per the complainant there was a telephonic call in which husband of the complainant sought termination of the marriage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench found substance in the submission tat demand of dowry after pronouncing divorce was not possible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Application was allowed and it was directed that in the event of arrest, applicants shall be released on bail. [Rafique Ahmed v. State of M.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/X864310b\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine MP 1521<\/b><\/a> , decided on 08-07-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Shailendra Shukla, J., while addressing a anticipatory bail application, held that, &#8220;&#8230;applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13011,3049,2570,35426,31299,13261,42469],"class_list":["post-232117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-Arrest","tag-Cruelty","tag-nikah","tag-section-498-a-ipc","tag-talaq","tag-termination-of-marriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Shailendra Shukla, J., while addressing a anticipatory bail application, held that, &#8220;&#8230;applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-13T04:29:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-31T07:16:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/\",\"name\":\"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-13T04:29:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-31T07:16:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Shailendra Shukla, J., while addressing a anticipatory bail application, held that, &#8220;&#8230;applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-13T04:29:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-31T07:16:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","name":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-13T04:29:27+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-31T07:16:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/31\/triple-talaq-no-bar-on-granting-anticipatory-bail-for-an-offence-committed-under-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":0},"title":"Triple Talaq| No bar on granting anticipatory bail for an offence committed under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that there is no bar on granting anticipatory bail for an offence committed under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019, provided that the competent court must hear the married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/triple-talaq-bom-hc-bail-denied-to-muslim-man-accused-of-giving-divorce-illegally-in-violation-of-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":1},"title":"[Triple Talaq] Bom HC | Bail denied to Muslim Man accused of giving divorce illegally in violation of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sarang V. Kotwal, J., while denied bail on the light of giving divorce in violation of the provisions of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. Applicant sought anticipatory bail for cases registered under Sections 377, 498 A, 323, 504, 506 of Penal Code, 1860,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287649,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/24\/allahabad-hc-rejects-quashing-of-proceedings-under-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad HC rejects plea for quashing of proceedings under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that if a case disclosing commission of an offence under remedial statute like Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 is nipped in the bud, the Statute aforesaid, which seeks to curtail a long-standing practice in society, would be bogged down.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217502,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/parliament-passes-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-bill-2019-triple-talaq-void-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":3},"title":"Triple Talaq void &#038; illegal | Parliament passes the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019!","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Parliament passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill\u00a02019, yesterday, i.e. 30-07-2019 and it would replace Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Second Ordinance, 2019. The practice of instant divorce by Muslim men will be punishable by a jail term of up to three years. This Bill\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Foreign Legislation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/mp-hc-anticipatory-bail-granted-where-fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-filed-after-divorce-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Anticipatory bail granted where FIR under Section 498-A IPC filed after divorce suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The application was filed before the Bench of S.C. Sharma, J. under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code for grant of anticipatory bail. Applicants were apprehending their arrest for offences punishable under Section 498-A, 506 and 34 of the Penal Code registered with Police Station Pandrinath,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/need-for-uniform-civil-code-to-curb-superstitious-practices-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":232117,"position":5},"title":"MP High Court quashes charges under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act; stresses on need for UCC to curb superstitious practices","author":"Ritu","date":"July 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere are a lot of other deprecating, fundamentalist, superstitious and ultra-conservative practices prevalent in the society that are clothed in the name of faith and belief.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}