{"id":231871,"date":"2020-07-07T09:53:48","date_gmt":"2020-07-07T04:23:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=231871"},"modified":"2020-07-17T14:21:06","modified_gmt":"2020-07-17T08:51:06","slug":"glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/","title":{"rendered":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>B.P. Colabawalla, J., granted interim relief in a matter between HUL and Emami over the use of “Glow & Handsome” and held that Emami before initiating any legal proceedings shall give 7 days prior notice to Hindustan Unilever Limited.<\/p>\n

Present suit was filed under Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking injunction against the defendant from issuing groundless threats to the plaintiff in respect of the use of its trademark “GLOW & HANDSOME”<\/p>\n

Plaintiff’s advocate, Hiren Kamod submitted that plaintiff sought limited ad-interim relief, that defendant should give atleast 7 clear days prior written notice before initiating any legal proceedings.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Further it was stated that, after conducting a search in the Register of Trade Marks, the Plaintiff independently and honestly coined and adopted the trade marks \u2018GLOW & LOVELY\u2019 and \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019 in respect of its skin care products.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

To secure statutory rights in the \u2018GLOW & LOVELY\u2019 and \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019 marks the Plaintiff filed multiclass applications.<\/p>\n

On 2nd July, 2020,<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Plaintiff made an official announcement that its trade mark \/ brand \u2018FAIR & LOVELY\u2019 is rebranded as \u2018GLOW & LOVELY\u2019 for its skin care range of products and the Plaintiff\u2019s skin care range of FAIR & LOVELY products for men will be called as \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n
\n
\n

It is stated that the plaintiff was granted its FDA License to manufacture its skin care products under the mark \u201cGLOW & HANDSOME\u201d on 3rd July 2020. Thereafter, the plaintiff immediately issued commercial advertisements in respect of its products bearing the trade mark \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019 not only on social media but also in the newspapers.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Immediately after the plaintiff made announcement on 2nd July 2020, the defendant gave statements in various newspapers inter alia threatening to adopt legal action against the Plaintiff for violating the Defendant\u2019s alleged rights in its mark \u2018EMAMI GLOW AND HANDSOME\u2019.<\/p>\n

Adding to the above contentions, plaintiff’s advocate submitted that defendant\u2019s claim of proprietorship over the marks \u2018GLOW AND HANDSOME\u2019 \/ \u2018EMAMI GLOW AND HANDSOME\u2019 is false and misconceived. <\/span><\/p>\n

Plaintiff is the prior adopter and user of the trade mark \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n

Prima facie<\/em> it does appear that having filed its trade mark application in September 2018 and subsequently on 25th June 2020 for the mark \u2018GLOW & HANDSOME\u2019, the plaintiff is the prior adopter of the said mark, whereas, defendant adopted the \u2018GLOW AND HANDSOME\u2019 mark for the first time on 25th June 2020 and has not commercially used it till date.<\/span><\/p>\n

On considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Court stated that no harm or prejudice would be caused to the defendant if the limited relief as prayed by the plaintiff is granted.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Plaintiff was granted liberty to renew its application for further reliefs on the adjourned date, after giving notice to the defendant. [Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Emami Limited, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 764<\/b> <\/a>, decided on 06-07-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0B.P. Colabawalla, J., granted interim relief in a matter between HUL and Emami over the use of “Glow & Handsome” <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[42375,42378,42377,38127,42376,42379,4331],"class_list":["post-231871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-fair-lovely","tag-glow-handsome","tag-glow-lovely","tag-legal-action","tag-multiclass-applications","tag-section-142-of-trade-marks-act","tag-trademarks"],"yoast_head":"\n[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0B.P. Colabawalla, J., granted interim relief in a matter between HUL and Emami over the use of “Glow & Handsome”\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":498,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"FAIR & LOVELY\",\"GLOW & HANDSOME\",\"GLOW & LOVELY\",\"Legal Action\",\"Multiclass Applications\",\"Section 142 of Trade Marks Act\",\"Trademarks\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/\",\"name\":\"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/07\\\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0B.P. Colabawalla, J., granted interim relief in a matter between HUL and Emami over the use of “Glow & Handsome”","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL","datePublished":"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/"},"wordCount":498,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","keywords":["FAIR & LOVELY","GLOW & HANDSOME","GLOW & LOVELY","Legal Action","Multiclass Applications","Section 142 of Trade Marks Act","Trademarks"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/","name":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-07T04:23:48+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-17T08:51:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/glow-handsome-hul-v-emami-trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-cannot-initiate-any-legal-proceedings-without-giving-7-days-prior-notice-to-hul\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Glow & Handsome] HUL v. Emami | Trademark Suit | Bom HC | Emami cannot initiate any legal proceedings without giving 7 days prior notice to HUL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234269,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/trademark-suit-bom-hc-emami-restrained-from-use-of-trademark-glow-hul-prima-facie-prior-adopter-of-the-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":0},"title":"[Trademark Suit] Bom HC | Emami restrained from use of trademark “Glow & Handsome”; HUL prima facie prior adopter of the trademark","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., granted an interim injunction to Hindustan Unilever Limited while restraining \"Emami\" from the use of trademark \"Glow & Handsome\" till the final disposal of hearing. Hindustan Unilever Limited by the present interim application claimed to be a proprietor and prior user of the mark \"Glow\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232365,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/17\/glow-handsome-trademark-suit-bom-hc-dismisses-emamis-appeal-against-single-judges-ad-interim-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":1},"title":"[Glow & Handsome] | Trademark Suit | Bom HC dismisses Emami’s appeal against Single Judge’s ad-interim order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of R.D. Dhanuka and V.G. Bisht, JJ., dismissed \"Emami's\" appeal against the ad-interim order passed by the Single Judge Bench of this Court on 6-07-2020, wherein the following was held, Emami before initiating any legal proceedings shall give 7 days prior notice to Hindustan Unilever\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320088,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/15\/fair-and-handsome-glow-and-handsome-calcutta-high-court-rules-in-favour-of-emami-in-passing-off-dispute-against-hindustan-unilever-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Fair and Handsome\u2019 v. \u2018Glow and Handsome\u2019; Calcutta HC rules in favour of Emami in Passing Off Dispute Against Hindustan Unilever","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Unfair advantage through conscious adoption of a competitor's mark leads to potential confusion and deception\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321152,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/recent-updates-on-intellectual-property-april-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":3},"title":"IP Roundup April 2024 | Recent updates on Intellectual Property","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Update yourself with all the latest Intellectual Property updates in April 2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IP Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/IP-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/IP-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/IP-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/IP-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288800,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/07\/bombay-high-court-denies-interim-relief-to-phonepe-against-bharatpe-trademark-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":4},"title":"Interim Relief to \u2018Phonepe\u2019 denied in trademark infringement suit; Trademarks \u2018phonepe\u2019 and \u2018postpe\u2019 have no phonetic similarity: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The court while denying the interim relief to \u2018Phonepe\u2019 said that it is settled law that when the plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie case in its favor, the aspects of grave and irreparable loss in the absence of interim reliefs and balance of convenience pale into insignificance.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/intellectual-property-rights-roundup-with-top-ip-cases-july-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":231871,"position":5},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights | A quick view of top Intellectual Property cases from July and August 2024","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of top Intellectual Property cases on sale of counterfeit copies of EBC\u2019s books, Nizam\u2019s trade mark, Mankind v. Mercykind, Adidas, L\u2019Or\u00e9al, Electronica, and more.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231871"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231871\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}