{"id":231221,"date":"2020-06-22T15:30:06","date_gmt":"2020-06-22T10:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=231221"},"modified":"2020-07-14T18:02:43","modified_gmt":"2020-07-14T12:32:43","slug":"intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/","title":{"rendered":"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">1. Intellectual Property Rights is an acronym that hardly needs to be expanded nowadays. Everyone, who matters in scientific circles, is talking about intellectual property rights, and the importance of protecting scientific discoveries, with commercial potential, in a tight maze of patents. Legitimacy of the global intellectual property right system is in question for its inability to generate symmetrical opportunities for traditional knowledge-holders vis-\u00e0-vis<i> <\/i>the inventors and innovators in the formal sector. The status accorded to traditional knowledge and folklore poses particularly profound moral, legal, social and political problems. Such knowledge is not limited to definable or articulate sets of knowable elements. Yet, inter-generational equities could be irreversibly impacted internationally depending on the way solutions to appropriate benefits are structured by vesting ownership or use rights in such knowledge because resource availability and resource use would both be impacted. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">2. Liberalisation and globalisation have dramatically altered perceptions about science and its practice in India. The unabashed drive to patent and protect every conceivable scientific advance, no matter how incremental, has now reached a ridiculous level in the West. American and multinational companies, never known for moderation and thoughtfulness, when commercial interests are involved, have set out to fence vast areas of science under the guise of protecting intellectual property. Exponential growth of scientific knowledge, increasing demand for new forms of intellectual property protection as well as access to IP related information, increasing dominance of the new knowledge economy over the old \u2018brick and mortar\u2019 economy, complexities linked to IP in traditional knowledge, community knowledge and animate objects, will pose a challenge in setting the new 21<\/span><span class=\"s2\"><sup>st<\/sup><\/span><span class=\"s1\"> century IP agenda. In the context of trade and business, Trade Related Aspects of the Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the Convention on Bio-diversity (CBD), respectably, required the creation of new economic rights and obligations to complement the IPR system under World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Matters concerning traditional knowledge, hitherto pursued only in the form of cultural rights or heritage issues at the UN, UNESCO and WIPO are regarded relevant also for development rights for which the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was created and economic rights for which earlier UN-ECOSOC and more recently, WTO have been mandated. Also, there are certain categories of traditional knowledge like traditional medicine which still are subserving the public health objectives under WHO\u2019s Traditional Medicine Strategy for 2002-2005. Moreover, traditional knowledge is valued not because of antiquity but because more of it is transmitted orally, as part of knowledge necessary to sustain lives and livelihoods and it has an economic value which is variable. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\" style=\"color: #008000;\"><b>HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">3. Two protective paradigms have been employed to protect traditional knowledge using intellectual property tools. The first protective paradigm seeks to prevent others from using or securing intellectual property rights over traditional knowledge. For example, some communities have created traditional knowledge databases to evidence their traditional knowledge as prior art in order to prevent perceived abuses such as biopiracy. Although traditional knowledge database may pre-empt some from securing rights over traditional knowledge, databases do disclose such traditional knowledge to the public. This becomes a problem since many communities would rather keep such traditional knowledge within their community. Many communities have their own traditional or customary laws that regulate the use of traditional knowledge that may differ substantially from their national system or the international system of intellectual property rights. Disclosure may violate these customs. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">4. The second protective paradigm (often called \u201cpositive protection\u201d) seeks to secure protective legal rights over traditional knowledge. This is achieved by either using the existing laws or using legislative means to enact new <em>sui generis<\/em> laws. Some have argued that some countries like the United States may face constitutional problems with granting perpetual rights to these communities. They also raise utilitarian concerns with granting legal rights to traditional knowledge. For instance, some forms of traditional knowledge (such as cures for disease) may be used to help others; and of exclusive rights were granted, some may go upheld. Other concerns deal with the equitable sharing of benefits and resources. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">5. Indigenous and local communities have argued that they generally don\u2019t use such incentives to innovate. Their use of knowledge is spiritually and culturally guided. Misappropriation and misuse of this knowledge may violate customary laws that are at the core of their collective and cultural identity. These beliefs are currently protected by a number of constitutional provisions and statutory laws, and are increasingly being recognised as a distinct human right within the United Nations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">Similarly, indigenous and local communities have argued that public claims in their knowledge without their consent amounts to a misappropriation of their identity and heritage, a violation of their fundamental, inalienable and collective human rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\" style=\"color: #008000;\"><b>IPR AND TRADITIONAL MEDICINE<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>A. THE NEEM CASE<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">6. A controversy that can be tagged as a first for India and which rose doubts about strict patent system was the granting of patent to a company, namely, W.R. Grace. The company was granted a patent in the US and the European Union, for a formulation that held the active ingredient in the neem plant in the stable storage of azadirachtin, and the same was planned to be used for its pesticidal properties. It was admitted by the applicant regarding how the pesticidal uses of neem were known and he pointed out to the fact that storing azadirachtin for a longer duration is difficult without the use of neem. The US patent granted, covered a limited invention whereby the applicant was only given the exclusive right to use azadirachtin in the particular storage solution described in -the patent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p8\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">The grant of the said patent caused an uproar and it was challenged through re-examination and post-grant opposition proceedings before the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO), respectively. Though there was no success at the USPTO, the European Patent Office ruled in favour of the opposition stating the patent granted, lacked in novelty and inventive step.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>B. THE \u2018JEEVANI\u2019 AND \u2018KANI\u2019 TRIBES<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">7. New experiments are beginning to emerge on benefit-sharing models for indigenous innovation. An example of India is worth sharing. It relates to a medicine which is developed from and based on active ingredients in a plant, <i>Trichopus zeylanicus <\/i>(Arogyapaacha), found in South-Western part of India. Scientists at the Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (TBGRI) in Kerala learnt of the plant, which is claimed to bolster the immune system and provide the additional energy. The medicine is traditional knowledge used by Kani Tribe. These scientists isolated and tested the ingredient and incorporated it into a compound, which they christened \u2018JEEVANI\u2019, the giver of life. The tonic is being manufactured by a major Ayurvedic drug company in Kerala. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>C. TURMERIC PATENT<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">8. Two US based Indians, Suman K. Das and Hari Har P. Cohly were granted a US Patent 5,40,504 on 28.03.1995 on use of turmeric in wound healing. The patent was assigned to University of Mississippi Medical Centre, USA. This patent claimed the administration of an effective amount of turmeric through local and oral route to enhance the wound healing process, a novel finding. Any patent, before it is granted, has to fulfil the basic requirements of novelty, non-obviousness and utility. Thus, if the claims have been covered by the relevant published art, then the patent becomes invalid. CSIR could locate 32 references (some of them being more than 100-year-old and in Sankrit, Urdu and Hindi), which showed that this finding was well-known in India prior to filing of this patent. The formal request for re-examination of the patent was filed by CSIR at USPTO on 28.10.1996. On 20.11.1997, the examiner rejected all the claims once again as being anticipated and obvious. The re-examination certificate was issued on this case on 21.04.1998 bringing the re-examination proceedings to a close. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\" style=\"color: #008000;\"><b>PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>A. RE-EXAMINATION OF US PATENT ON BASMATI<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">9. Rice Tec Inc. had applied for registration of a mark \u2018TEXMATI\u2019 before the UK Trademark Registry. It was successfully opposed by Agricultural and Processed Food Exports Authority (APEDA). One of the documents relied upon by Rice Tec as evidence in support of the registration of the said mark was the US Patent 5,663,484 (hereafter referred to as \u2018484 patent\u2019) granted by US Patent Office to Rice Tec on 02.09.1997 and this is how this patent became an issue for contest. The said patent covered 20 claims covering not only a novel rice plant but also various rice lines; resulting plants and grains, seed deposit claims, method for selecting a rice plant for breeding and propagation. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">10. In the wake of this controversy, the Government of India set up a Task Force under the Chairmanship of Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development, to examine the possibilities of filing a re-examination request against the above-mentioned US patent. The Task Force, in turn, set up a technical committee comprising primarily the ICAR and CSIR scientists to examine the patent specification in detail and to collect necessary documentary evidence that may be required to file the re-examination request against the US patent. Evidence from IARI Bulletin was used against Claims 1517. Eventually, a request for re-examination of this patent was filed on 28.04.2000. Soon after filing the re-examination request, Rice Tec chose to withdraw 15 claims and the threat of infringement by the export of Basmati grains to US has been averted. Now, with the surrender of all the other broad claims, even the alleged threat to the export of grains of insensitive rice lines from India has been averted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>B. RULINGS RELAVENT TO YOGA<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">11. In this regard, the applicant registered his copyright interest in the book regarding sequence of asanas with the Copyright Office, and then, in 2002 he filed a supplemental registration i.e. a correction filed when the original registration is incorrect or incomplete. According to the said supplemental registration, the applicant was not only claiming rights in the book itself but also on the sequence of 26 asanas taught in the book. An organisation called Open Source Yoga Unity, which, according to its website, is a non-profit collective to ensure the continued natural unfettered development of Yoga, challenged this supplemental registration and asked the US District Court for the Northern District of California to issue a declaratory judgment saying that the applicant could not have exclusive rights over the sequence of asanas as mentioned in the book. However, the said argument was rejected by the Court in 2005, stating that the sequence might be protectable as a compilation. Later, when a question was put to the Copyright Office for its opinion on the said matter, the agency in June 2012 issued its Policy Statement, which concluded that sequences of yoga asanas or any sequence of exercises or movements, excluding choreography, could not be protected as compilations, as they were not compilations of literary works, musical works, or any of the other kinds of works protected by the copyright law.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">Within six months, the Policy Statement formed the basis of another court\u2019s decision, when in December 2012, the US District Court for the Central District of California was faced with another dispute over Bikram Yoga. The dispute started when two yoga instructors in Buffalo, New York completed the certification course from the applicant and were authorised by his organisation to teach the basic Yoga system. They formed their own educational enterprise, Evolation Yoga LLC, and opened a series of yoga schools. The applicant sued Evolation Yoga LLCa lleging copyright infringement, however the court granted summary judgment for Evolation, stating that as a matter of law a sequence of yoga asanas cannot be copyrighted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>C. TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE DIGITAL LIBRARY<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">12. These cases were an eye opener and they triggered the Government of India to create Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) and also to include traditional knowledge in the International Patent Clarification System. TKDL is an initiative by India to digitise and document knowledge available in the public domain to facilitate systematic arrangements, dissemination and retrieval of information. While granting patents, authorities check invention to prior art in public domain. Documentation of knowledge will help them trace invention in public domain and help them to know whether it is eligible for patents, thus preventing misappropriation of traditional knowledge.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\" style=\"color: #008000;\">* Advocate and qualified Chartered Accountant. Author is currently Senior Associate in the Dispute Resolution Practice at L&amp;L Partners Law Offices, New Delhi. Author\u2019s views are personal.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Achal Gupta*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":231222,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[42083,42084,8341,7071,29943,42085,30847,40080],"class_list":["post-231221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-globalisation","tag-human-rights-protection","tag-intellectual-property-rights","tag-liberalisation","tag-traditional-knowledge","tag-unesco","tag-wipo","tag-wto"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Achal Gupta*\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-22T10:00:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-14T12:32:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/\",\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-22T10:00:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-14T12:32:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0","og_description":"by Achal Gupta*","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-06-22T10:00:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-14T12:32:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/","name":"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-22T10:00:06+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-14T12:32:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/22\/intellectual-property-rights-and-protection-of-traditional-knowledge-a-general-indian-perspective\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Intellectual Property Rights and Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A General Indian Perspective\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/IP-RIGHTS.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":232469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/18\/human-rights-and-rights-in-intellectual-property-fixing-the-framework-for-a-better-tomorrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":0},"title":"Human Rights and Rights in Intellectual Property \u2014 Fixing the Framework for a Better Tomorrow","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"*Hetvi Trivedi, Research Associate, GNLU-GUJCOST Research Centre of Excellence in IP Laws, Policies & Practices, Gujarat National Law University Cite as: (2020) PL (IPR) April 88","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Human-Rights.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Human-Rights.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Human-Rights.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Human-Rights.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Human-Rights.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":84072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/10\/india-uk-sign-mou-on-intellectual-property-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":1},"title":"India &#038; UK sign MoU on Intellectual Property Rights","author":"Saba","date":"November 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"India and UK signed an MoU to establish bilateral cooperation activities in the field of Intellectual Property. The MoU is between the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) and the Intellectual Property Office of the United Kingdom (UKIPO). It is intended to promote innovation, creativity and economic growth in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/10\/gnlu-centre-for-intellectual-property-rights-ipr-essay-competition\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":2},"title":"GNLU Centre for Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Essay Competition","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Reported by Vardaan Bajaj","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law School News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/trophies2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/trophies2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/trophies2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/trophies2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/trophies2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/05\/national-conference-on-intellectual-property-rights-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":3},"title":"National Conference on Intellectual Property Rights","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Reported by Mandar Bhatodkar Colloquium Opus,\u00a0the Seminar Committee of National Law University Odisha is pleased to announce that it is organizing a National Conference on Intellectual Property Rights in collaboration with Intellectual Property Analysis and Advocacy Centre of NLUO on the 27th\u00a0and 28th\u00a0of September 2014 at NLUO. The core focus\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Intellectual Property&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Intellectual Property","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/intellectual_property\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/cnlu-logo-design-competition-last-date-for-submission-january-16-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":4},"title":"CNLU | Logo Design Competition [Last date for submission: January 16, 2021]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Reported by Jyotshna Yashaswi","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law School News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241653,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/03\/cnlu-essay-writing-competition\/","url_meta":{"origin":231221,"position":5},"title":"CNLU | Essay Writing Competition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Reported by Jyotshna Yashaswi","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law School News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/cnlu2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231221\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/231222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}