{"id":229892,"date":"2020-05-21T09:00:22","date_gmt":"2020-05-21T03:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=229892"},"modified":"2020-05-29T18:35:09","modified_gmt":"2020-05-29T13:05:09","slug":"del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Trial Court&#8217;s decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Vibhu Bakhru, J., upheld the decision of trial court for offence of rape and videographing the same while clicking nude photographs of the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant filed an appeal against the judgment convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n)\/ 354C\/ 506 of Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Background of Case<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant had raped a 20 year old girl and videographed the act along with clicking nude photographs of her. Further he blackmailed her while demanding 5 lakh rupees.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Prosecutrix&#8217;s stance<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The accused kept pursuing the prosecutrix to meet through various messages and calls from unknown numbers and while the prosecutrix kept ignoring the same and warned him that she will complaint to the police and in response accused said that he would commit suicide and she would be responsible for the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Next day, again the accused gave a call to the prosecutrix asking her to come to Nirman Vihar Station otherwise he would commit suicide and bring disrepute to her. Fearing the same, she wen to meet him after which the accused took her to a guest house and forcibly established physical relationship, taking nudes photographs her and recording the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further he threatened her that in case she doesn&#8217;t attends his calls and comes to the places where he calls her, she would have to suffer ignominy. Next day, she informed her family members and a complaint was lodged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In another statement under Section 164 CrPC to police, the difference noted was the following:<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 21\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8220;&#8230;he had pulled her hair and slapped her and further told her that if she screamed, no one would listen to her. He ordered her to remove her clothes. He also rung up someone (purportedly, to his uncle) and stated that \u201cchacha ye ladki maan nahi rahi hai, aap aa jaao\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 26\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Bench Observed that,<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>There is no inconsistency in her statement that the appellant had forcibly established physical relationship with her.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 26\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Any doubt that could have been entertained regarding whether the prosecutrix and the appellant had any consensual sex is removed by the fact that the appellant had prepared a video clip of him establishing physical relationship with the prosecutrix.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">the testimony of the prosecutrix that the appellant had threatened her that he would upload her video and photographs on the net, <strong>cannot be disbelieved.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 28\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court found no infirmity with the decision of the Trial Court in convicting the appellant for committing offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 (Part I) and 354 C of the Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, in view of the above, appeal stands dismissed. [Rahul v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CO6o7uwY\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Del 596<\/b> <\/a>, decided on 18-05-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bakhru, J., upheld the decision of trial court for offence of rape and videographing the same while clicking nude <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[41506,36891,2572,19841,41505],"class_list":["post-229892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-forcible-relationship","tag-non-consensual-sex","tag-Rape","tag-section-164-crpc","tag-section-376-2n-of-penal-code"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Trial Court&#039;s decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Trial Court&#039;s decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bakhru, J., upheld the decision of trial court for offence of rape and videographing the same while clicking nude\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-21T03:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-05-29T13:05:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Trial Court's decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-21T03:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-05-29T13:05:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Trial Court&#8217;s decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Trial Court's decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Trial Court's decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bakhru, J., upheld the decision of trial court for offence of rape and videographing the same while clicking nude","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-05-21T03:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-05-29T13:05:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/","name":"Del HC | Trial Court's decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-05-21T03:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-05-29T13:05:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/del-hc-trial-courts-decision-for-offence-of-committing-repeated-rape-and-voyeurism-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Trial Court&#8217;s decision for offence of committing repeated Rape and Voyeurism upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/25\/all-hc-a-woman-or-a-girl-who-is-raped-is-not-an-accomplice-hc-re-establishes-while-explaining-the-significance-of-testimony-of-rape-victim\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":0},"title":"All HC | \u201cA woman or a girl who is raped is not an accomplice\u201d: HC re-establishes while explaining the significance of testimony of rape victim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Ved Prakash Vaish and Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, JJ., expressed that: \u201cJustice demands that courts should impose punishment fitting to the crime. The courts must not only keep in view the rights of the criminal but also the rights of the victim of crime\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/29\/tri-hc-consent-obtained-for-intercourse-on-false-promise-of-marriage-attracts-s-90-ipc-conviction-for-rape-under-s-376-ipc-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":1},"title":"Tri HC | Consent obtained for intercourse on false promise of marriage attracts S. 90 IPC; conviction for rape under S. 376 IPC upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0Sanjay Karol, CJ, dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the decision of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC committing rape on the prosecutrix. The prosecution alleged that the appellant made sexual relations with the prosecutrix, who was of unstable mind, on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/02\/del-hc-can-an-hiv-positive-patient-be-prosecuted-for-an-offence-of-attempt-to-murder-if-he-had-sexual-intercourse-without-womans-consent-read-detailed-ruling-of-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Can an HIV positive patient be prosecuted for an offence of attempt to murder, if he had sexual intercourse without woman&#8217;s consent? Read detailed ruling of HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bakhru, J., observed that If an HIV positive person is aware of their condition and has unprotected sex, the person can be punished under Section 270 of Penal Code, 1860. Appellant was convicted by the trial court under Sections 376\/313\/307 of Penal Code, 1860. Appellant was found\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/04\/del-hc-acquittal-of-rape-accused-upheld-on-finding-that-the-real-intent-behind-criminal-proceedings-was-to-force-him-to-marry-prosecutrix\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Acquittal of rape accused upheld on finding that the real intent behind criminal proceedings was to force him to marry prosecutrix","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed of an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the respondent, accused of raping the appellant-prosecutrix, was acquitted. The case of the prosecutrix was that the accused established physical relations with her under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":358116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/28\/one-accused-can-be-convicted-in-gang-rape-case-absence-of-co-accused-no-bar-to-gang-rape-conviction-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":4},"title":"\u2018One accused can be convicted in gang-rape case\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds conviction of one accused where co-accused could not be apprehended","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the convict and the co-accused had kidnapped the minor girl on their bike and raped her in the jungle. The convict had been apprehended but the co-accused had managed to escape.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"One accused can be convicted in gang-rape case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/One-accused-can-be-convicted-in-gang-rape-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/One-accused-can-be-convicted-in-gang-rape-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/One-accused-can-be-convicted-in-gang-rape-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/One-accused-can-be-convicted-in-gang-rape-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/jindalgangrapecase-upheld-convictionof20years-rigorousimprisonment-2formerstudents-of-jindalgloballawschool-acquittedthird-giving-benefitofdoubt-punjabandharyanahighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":229892,"position":5},"title":"[Jindal Gang Rape Case] Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds 20 years\u2019 RI for two students ; acquits one giving benefit of doubt","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding the present appeal preferred by the accused of the Jindal gang rape case, Tejinder Singh Dhindsa and Pankaj Jain, JJ., upheld the conviction of 20 years rigorous imprisonment to 2 former students of Jindal Global Law School and acquitted the third giving him\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}