{"id":229136,"date":"2020-05-06T13:15:49","date_gmt":"2020-05-06T07:45:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=229136"},"modified":"2020-07-14T19:35:42","modified_gmt":"2020-07-14T14:05:42","slug":"basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/","title":{"rendered":"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly"},"content":{"rendered":"

Almost half a century ago, on 23-4-1973, the legal fraternity in India and perhaps the world over, rejoiced as the largest ever Bench constituted by the Supreme Court of India gave birth to the Basic Structure Doctrine<\/i> vide its verdict in His Holiness Keshavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala<\/i>[1]<\/strong><\/a> (\u2018Keshavananda Bharati\u2019<\/i>), thereby forever circumscribing the amendment powers of Parliament. Objectively viewed, one cannot overstate the impact and influence that the Doctrine<\/i> has had on Indian constitutionalism. In fact for those looking to redeem the Indian Constitution from the onslaught of incessant amendments during that era, it is akin to a \u2018re-birth\u2019 thereof; altering the scope and sphere of Article 368 for possibly all times to come. Inherent, therefore, to the study of Kesavananda Bharati<\/i>[2] <\/strong><\/a>verdict is an examination of how the Constituent Assembly eventually arrived at Part XX of the Constitution of India.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The task of drafting the \u2018amending procedure\u2019 for the Constitution came up before the Union Constitution Committee (UCC) sometime around early June 1947. From the very beginning, the members of the UCC were divided into two camps \u2013 those favouring a stricter amendment process and those in favour of a more facile one. Notably, stalwarts such as Nehru and B.N. Rau (and to an extent even Ambedkar) always remained in favour of the latter such that \u2018a Constituent Assembly, not elected by adult suffrage, can draft a Constitution by simple majority, but a Parliament elected by adult suffrage cannot amend it except by special majorities\u2019 <\/i>[3]<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, between June 1947 when the UCC began its meetings and February 1948 when the Draft Constitution was laid out before the Constituent Assembly, the amending procedure began to shape-up in the manner in which it would appear vide Article 368. Nevertheless, all throughout that period, an un-alterable \u2018basic structure\u2019<\/i> such as to render certain parts\/chapters of the ensuing Constitution beyond the pale of Parliament\u2019s amendment powers was never<\/i> the cynosure of any debate. In fact, the Union Constitution Committee was rather preoccupied with internal squabbles over constitutional amendment by \u2018simple majority\u2019 or by way of a \u2018special procedure\u2019 involving 2\/3<\/span>rd<\/sup><\/span> majority as well as the State Legislatures. As has been enunciated above, Nehru and Rau (perhaps to an extent even Ambedkar) always remained in favour of a \u2018pliant\u2019 Constitution such that it could be moulded by future Parliaments towards the social and economic exigencies likely to be faced by the newly formed Republic of India. In fact, Nehru remained steadfast in his demand for amendment by a simple majority and though eventually Part XX of the Constitution did not incorporate the same, many provisions of the Constitution carry that legacy, most notable being the power vested in Parliament to alter State borders without their consent and without having to adopt the procedure laid out i.e. requiring a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that house present and voting<\/i>. <\/span><\/p>\n

B.N. Rau presented his Draft Constitution just a month after independence in September of 1947 and though the amendment clause therein favoured the flexible approach based on simple majority, for the first time perhaps there was enunciation of an express prohibition against amending the provisions for reservation of seats for minorities in the legislatures[4]<\/strong><\/a>. However, the Drafting Committee was at odds with the same and the Draft Constitution, 1948 as was presented to the President of the Constituent Assembly was more in the nature of Part XX as appears in the Constitution of India. <\/span><\/p>\n

What piques one\u2019s curiosity, however, is that in consonance with Rau\u2019s draft, Part XVI of the Draft Constitution also included a prohibition on amendment of reservation of seats for Muslims, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes or Indian Christians in Parliament and State Legislatures[5]<\/strong><\/a>. Some may embark on the misadventure of citing this as a primitive form of the Basic Structure Doctrine, however, that would be disingenuous to say the least. During the intervening years of 1947 and 1949, records clearly point to a preoccupation of the Constituent Assembly, as also others involved with the framing of the Constitution, with the \u2018how\u2019<\/i> rather than \u2018whether\u2019<\/i>. In fact, as Granville Austin has lucidly encapsulated in his work, the Constituent Assembly was very much conscious of the fact that their efforts were prone to error and thus did not look favourably upon an uncompromising procedure[6]<\/strong><\/a>. At this juncture several doubts were raised as to the representative character of the Constituent Assembly[7]<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet Ambedkar, despite being in favour of the importance of an amending process in the Constitution of a federal republic, was never tolerant of any insinuation that strayed towards impugning the representative character of the Constituent Assembly. It was thus in the above background that he eventually, about a couple of months before adoption of the Constitution on 26 November 1949, introduced Amendment No. 118 to Article 304 of the Draft Constitution, thus finally giving shape to the amendment procedure as would thereafter be contained in Article 368 (Part XX) of our Constitution. <\/span><\/p>\n

Perusal of the Constituent Assembly Debates of 17 September 1949[8]<\/strong><\/a> would bring out that despite the widespread support for Nehru\u2019s views in favour of a pliant and flexible approach towards amendment of the Constitution and Article 305 of the Draft Constitution, the final version was wholly devoid of any such entrenched provisions. Thus, before concluding this discussion, two conspicuous omissions on part of the Framers of our Constitution must be evinced. Firstly, vide Article 305 of the Draft Constitution, though certain subjects were put beyond the pale of constitutional amendment for a period of 10 years, surprisingly very little thought was given to entrenching the portion containing Fundamental Rights. Secondly, when Ambedkar moved his Amendment No. 118 as above, Article 305 was done away in its entirety as an express exception to the amendment procedure of the Constitution. <\/span><\/p>\n

Evidently thus, without going into a merit based discussion on the Basic Structure Doctrine, perhaps to the Constituent Assembly the Constitution was a constantly evolving document in line with the social and economic realities and towards that the Framers were at ease to not entrench any part thereof. The happenings of early 1970s in all probability forced the hand of the Supreme Court in superimposing the embargo of basic structure. It thus becomes absolutely necessary that the Indian Republic be willing to expunge and efface it in line with the evolution of times as may present in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

*Author,\u00a0 Practising in <\/span>Supreme Court of India<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> (1973) 4 SCC 225<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> Ibid<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Austin, The Indian Constitution<\/i>, Oxford University Press; p. 325<\/span><\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Vide<\/i> Clause 232 of B.N. Rau\u2019s Draft Constitution<\/span><\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> See <\/i>Article 305, Part XVI, Draft Constitution of India, 1948, available at <\/span>https:\/\/www.constitutionofindia.net\/historical_constitutions\/draft_constitution_of_india__1948_21st%20February%201948<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Austin, The Indian Constitution<\/i>, Oxford University Press; p. 328<\/span><\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> Constituent Assembly of India Debates (Proceedings)<\/i>, Vol. IX (17 September 1949)<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> Id<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Ivan*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":229148,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[32788,7601,41156,5363],"class_list":["post-229136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-basic-structure-doctrine","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-his-holiness-keshavananda-bharati-sripadagalvaru-v-state-of-kerala","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBasic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Ivan*\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-06T07:45:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-14T14:05:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/\",\"name\":\"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-06T07:45:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-14T14:05:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly","og_description":"by Ivan*","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-05-06T07:45:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-14T14:05:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/","name":"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg","datePublished":"2020-05-06T07:45:49+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-14T14:05:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/06\/basic-structure-doctrine-was-never-basal-to-the-constituent-assembly\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basic Structure Doctrine was never Basal to the Constituent Assembly"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235396,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/06\/kesavananda-bharati-whose-petition-steered-the-way-to-the-basic-structure-doctrine-passes-away\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":0},"title":"Kesavananda Bharati, whose petition steered the way to the ‘Basic Structure doctrine’, passes away","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru, who initiated the case before the Supreme Court that gave us the \u2018Basic Structure\u2019 doctrine, passed away this morning at the age of 79 in his ashram at Edneer in north Kerala\u2019s Kasaragod district. His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati filed a petition on March 21, 1970,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/keshav.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/keshav.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/keshav.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/keshav.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/keshav.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290424,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/kesavananda-bharati-vs-state-of-kerala\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":1},"title":"50 years of the unprecedented case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala and the \u2018Doctrine of Basic Structure’","author":"Editor","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is snippet on the evolution of \u2018Doctrine of Basic Structure' in the Independent India and how the biggest legal battle continued between the Judiciary and the Legislature, as the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerela (1973) 4 SCC 225 enters its Golden Jubilee year.","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/doctrine-of-basic-structure.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/doctrine-of-basic-structure.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/doctrine-of-basic-structure.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/doctrine-of-basic-structure.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/the-untold-story-of-how-kesavananda-bharati-and-the-basic-structure-doctrine-survived-an-attempt-to-reverse-them-by-the-supreme-court-scc-archives\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":2},"title":"The Untold Story of How Kesavananda Bharati and the Basic Structure Doctrine Survived an Attempt to Reverse them by the Supreme Court [SCC Archives]","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by T.R. Andhyarujina\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/SC-OpEd.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/SC-OpEd.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/SC-OpEd.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/SC-OpEd.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/SC-OpEd.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/12\/constitution-prevailed-1973-2025-kesavananda-presidential-reference\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":3},"title":"Two Battles, One Victor: How the Constitution Prevailed in 1973 and 2025","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shreyas Narayana*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitution Prevailed 1973 and 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Constitution-Prevailed-1973-and-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Constitution-Prevailed-1973-and-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Constitution-Prevailed-1973-and-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Constitution-Prevailed-1973-and-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/07\/basic-structure-doctrine\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":4},"title":"Does basic structure doctrine applies to ordinary legislation","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akash Baglekar\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Basic-Structure-Doctrine.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/uganda-sc-constitutional-amendment-removing-age-limit-for-the-president-does-not-violate-the-basic-structure\/","url_meta":{"origin":229136,"position":5},"title":"Uganda SC | Constitutional Amendment removing age-limit for the President does not violate the Basic Structure","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Uganda: The Full Bench of Katureebe, CJ., Arach-Amoko, Mwangusya, Opio-Aweri, Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza, and Mugamba, JJ SC; and Tumwesigye, AG JSC upheld a Constitutional Amendment which negated age bar for the President and Local Council V Chairpersons. The Constitutional Court headed by Owiny-Dollo, DCJ. had declared that the Constitutional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Uganda-SC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Uganda-SC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Uganda-SC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Uganda-SC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Uganda-SC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229136\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/229148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}