{"id":227254,"date":"2020-03-19T08:00:53","date_gmt":"2020-03-19T02:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=227254"},"modified":"2020-03-19T13:50:42","modified_gmt":"2020-03-19T08:20:42","slug":"all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of — Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Govind Mathur, CJ and Samit Gopal, J., addressed a petition assailing the constitutional validity of Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 and asked the State of Uttar Pardesh to file a response for the same.<\/p>\n

Present petition was preferred to assail the constitutional validity of “The Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020”.<\/p>\n

Petitioner’s counsel submitted that Ordinance impugned deserves to be declared void being inconsistent with the provisions of Part-III of the Constitution of India. Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Re: Destruction of Public & Private Properties v. State of A.P.,\u00a0<\/em>(2009) 5 SCC 212<\/a>, stated that a person is having a fundamental right to privacy. Such valuable right shall be seriously infringed by operation of the Ordinance of 2020<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Further, provisions of the Ordinance shall allow the persons to be viral for public at large as criminal without their adjudication for any criminal charge. The above stated Ordinance is also in contravention of Supreme Court’s decision in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd., <\/em>2019 SCC Online SC 1456<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Adding to the above, it was emphasized that the intention of the Ordinance is only to frustrate and overrule the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court In-Re Banners Placed on Road Side In The City of Lucknow v. State of Uttar Pradesh<\/em> (PIL No. 532 of 2020), decided on 9-03-2020.<\/p>\n

Bench in view of the above considered it appropriate to have adequate response of the State of Uttar Pradesh by a counter affidavit on or before 25-03-2020.<\/p>\n

The case has been listed for 27-03-2020. [Shashank Shri Tripathi v. State of U.P., PIL No. 547 of 2020, decided on 18-03-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench of Govind Mathur, CJ and Samit Gopal, J., addressed a petition assailing the constitutional validity of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8731,9871,40082],"class_list":["post-227254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-constitutional-validity","tag-right-to-privacy","tag-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench of Govind Mathur, CJ and Samit Gopal, J., addressed a petition assailing the constitutional validity of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-19T02:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-19T08:20:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-19T02:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-19T08:20:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of — Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench of Govind Mathur, CJ and Samit Gopal, J., addressed a petition assailing the constitutional validity of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-03-19T02:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-19T08:20:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/","name":"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-03-19T02:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-19T08:20:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/all-hc-state-of-u-p-to-file-response-with-regard-to-petition-assailing-constitutional-validity-of-uttar-pradesh-recovery-of-damages-to-public-and-private-property-ordinance-2020\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | State of U.P. to file response with regard to petition assailing constitutional validity of — Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":227112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/16\/governor-of-uttar-pradesh-has-promulgated-uttar-pradesh-public-and-private-property-damage-recovery-ordinance-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":0},"title":"Governor of Uttar Pradesh has promulgated ‘Uttar Pradesh Public and Private Property Damage Recovery Ordinance, 2020’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttar Pradesh Public and Private Property Damage Recovery Ordinance, 2020 It is an Ordinance to deal with all such acts of violence at public places and to control its persistence and escalation and to provide for Recovery of damage to public or private property during hartal, bundh riots, public commotion,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UP-Assembly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UP-Assembly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UP-Assembly.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UP-Assembly.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UP-Assembly.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/karhc-dismisses-plea-challenging-constitutional-validity-of-karnataka-micro-loan-small-loan-ordinance-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka HC dismisses plea challenging constitutional validity of Karnataka Micro Loan and Small Loan (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ordinance has taken birth from the womb of social justice, and it nowhere depicts arbitrariness.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/01\/prohibition-of-unlawful-religious-conversion-uttar-pradesh-prohibition-of-unlawful-conversion-of-religion-ordinance-2020-brief-explainer\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":2},"title":"Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion | Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020 [Brief Explainer]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Marriage conducted for the sole purpose of Unlawful Conversion or vice-versa to be declared void.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-6.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-6.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-6.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-6.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-6.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/19\/all-hc-grown-up-adults-well-aware-about-consequences-of-alleged-relationship-have-fundamental-right-of-privacy-court-while-restraining-any-coercive-action-against-person-booked-under-u-p-ant\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":3},"title":"All HC | ‘Grown up adults, well aware about consequences of alleged relationship, have fundamental right of privacy’: Court while restraining any coercive action against person booked under U.P. Anti-Conversion Ordinance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Pankaj Naqvi and Vivek Agarwal, JJ., directed for no coercive action to be taken against a person booked under Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020, and highlighted the significance of the right to privacy. Petitioner sought the issuance of a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/11\/simplified-madhya-pradesh-freedom-of-religion-ordinance-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":4},"title":"Simplified | Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Governor of Madhya Pradesh promulgates the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, 2020. Purpose of this Ordinance To provide freedom of religion by prohibiting conversion from one religion to another by misrepresentation, allurement, use of threat or force, undue influence, coercion, marriage or any fraudulent means and for the matters\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":195837,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/07\/breakingformer-chief-ministers-not-entitled-to-govt-accommodation-up-law-unconstitutional-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":227254,"position":5},"title":"Former Chief Ministers not entitled to Govt. Accommodation; UP Law unconstitutional: SC [Full Report]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Striking down Section 4(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Ministers (Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1981, as amended in 2016, the bench of Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ held: \u201cThe Chief Minister, once he\/she demits the office, is at par with the common citizen, though by virtue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}