{"id":226856,"date":"2020-03-11T15:30:16","date_gmt":"2020-03-11T10:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226856"},"modified":"2020-03-20T15:38:26","modified_gmt":"2020-03-20T10:08:26","slug":"ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court<\/span>:<\/strong> A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and A.K. Mishra, JJ. dismissed the instant writ petition giving no relief to the petitioner observing tender bid does not suffer from any arbitrary, perverse or malafide action.<\/p>\n

The brief facts of the case are a tender notice was invited under National Competitive Bidding through e-procurement for construction of HL Bridge Lune-Karandia on Tikanpur-Dalanta Stand works by opposite party No. 2, the eligibility condition being \u00a0that the intending tender should have the total financial turn over in respect of the Civil Engineering Works of an amount not less than the amount put to tender during any three financial years taken together of the last proceeding five financial years (starting from 2013-14 to 2017-18 excluding the current financial year). The financial turn over certificate was required to be submitted from the Charted Accountant showing clearly the financial turn over financial year wise failing which, the tender would summarily be rejected. The petitioner, a super class contractor, submitted his bid application online with documents including Annual Turn Over certificate from Charted Accountant showing approximate cost Rs 45, 70, 54,874.<\/p>\n

Counsel Prasanna Kumar Parhi, B.K. Pardhi, J. Mohantyand D. Gochhayat for petitioners submitted that the petitioner qualified after evaluation of the technical bid and was accordingly informed about his qualification. It was further averred that the petitioner\u2019s firm quoted the lowest amount amongst four bidders only to be intimated later that tender had been rejected on grounds of disqualification. Such an action was averred to be illegal and violative of statutory provision of law. Hence the instant writ petition was filed to quash the letter disqualifying the petitioner and to allow the petitioner to execute the work.<\/p>\n

Opposite parties submitted that the petitioner was not eligible as he did not meet the total turnover required and by mistake he was found eligible which was rectified after receiving a complaint from opposite party 5 and such bonafide mistake was communicated without any malafide intention.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the estimated cost of the work being Rs 45,70,54,874 it is required to show the total financial year turnover in respect of Civil Engineering works of an amount not less than the above amount during the three financial years and the amount furnished would not meet the eligibility requirement and therefore a mistake was committed while evaluating the technical bid which was detected by the Tender Evaluation Committee. The Court relied on a judgment of\u00a0Municipal Corpn., Ujjain <\/span>v<\/span>. BVG (India) Ltd.<\/span><\/em>; (2018) 5 SCC 462<\/a> held that if a mistake with regard to eligibility is detected subsequently, it cannot be said that the mistake is beyond correction unless it is done with malafide, arbitrariness or perversity. [Parida Constructions v. State of Odisha, 2020 SCC OnLine Ori 64<\/a>, <\/b>decided on 03-03-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and A.K. Mishra, JJ. dismissed the instant writ petition giving no relief to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39945,39947,39948,39946],"class_list":["post-226856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-expert-consultant","tag-malafide-action","tag-technical-bidding","tag-technical-qualifications"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and A.K. Mishra, JJ. dismissed the instant writ petition giving no relief to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-11T10:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-20T10:08:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-11T10:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-20T10:08:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding","og_description":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and A.K. Mishra, JJ. dismissed the instant writ petition giving no relief to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-03-11T10:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-20T10:08:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/","name":"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-03-11T10:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-20T10:08:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/11\/ori-hc-court-not-to-interfere-with-judgment-of-expertconsultant-on-issues-of-technical-qualification-mistake-found-subsequently-is-not-beyond-correction-in-technical-bidding\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Court not to interfere with judgment of expert consultant on issues of technical qualification; Mistake found subsequently is not beyond correction in technical bidding"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/16\/allahabad-high-court-reiterates-scope-of-judicial-review-of-tender-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court reiterates scope of judicial review in terms of tender prescribing eligibility criteria","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe writ Court is not required to find fault of the authorities with a magnifying glass rather the Court should examine the decision-making process and also leave room for interpretation of the contract by the authorities.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/26\/it-is-only-when-a-purchase-order-is-placed-that-a-contract-would-be-entered-into-and-only-then-arbitration-clause-would-become-part-ther\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":1},"title":"Ori HC | It is only when a purchase order is placed that a \u2018contract\u2019 would be entered into and only then arbitration clause would become part thereof","author":"Editor","date":"May 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: S. Muralidhar, CJ. dismissed the petition, declined the appointment of arbitrator and left it open to the petitioners to avail other remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law. The facts of the case are such that opposite parties 1 and 2 floated a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":379902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/01\/sc-courts-exercise-judicial-restraint-in-contractual-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":2},"title":"Marginal technical score difference in tender bidding can’t justify interference with owner’s commercial decision: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that Constitutional Courts should not exercise an \u201cex-ante jurisdiction\u201d to pre-empt executive decisions in such matters, as doing so would undermine the contractual discretion vested in the authority.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"judicial restraint in contractual matters","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/judicial-restraint-in-contractual-matters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/judicial-restraint-in-contractual-matters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/judicial-restraint-in-contractual-matters.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/judicial-restraint-in-contractual-matters.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/cartelisation-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Can possible case of cartelization be determined only after opening of commercial bid? HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.C. Gupte and M.S. Karnik, JJ., expressed that for an employer to come to a conclusion of a possible case of cartelization, it is not necessary that the same can happen only after the opening of commercial bids. Petitioner claimed to be a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/delhi-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-tender-award-passed-by-indian-oil-corporation\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Barred by delay and laches\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging tender award passed by Indian Oil Corporation","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that the issuance of a commitment letter does not make the issuer a \u2018bidder\u2019 in the tender process.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/patna-hc-tender-for-placement-of-security-guards-holding-the-procedure-of-technical-bid-and-financial-bid-to-be-manipulated-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":226856,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Tender for placement of security guards holding the procedure of technical bid and financial bid to be manipulated– set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Anjana Mishra, JJ. rejected a letters patent appeal arising from an order in a writ petition wherein a tender process was held to be vitiated. Respondent herein had filed a writ petition challenging tender for placement of security\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226856\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}