{"id":226495,"date":"2020-03-04T13:00:31","date_gmt":"2020-03-04T07:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226495"},"modified":"2020-03-06T13:25:27","modified_gmt":"2020-03-06T07:55:27","slug":"hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0 <\/span><\/b>Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. held that the order of the Tribunal was devoid of any fault on the ground that mere transfer does not mean that such registered owner stands absolved of his liability to a third person unless and untill changes are not made in RTO records.<\/p>\n

Brief facts of the case are that the claimant \/respondent 1 was travelling in bus which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner by respondent 2\u00a0 <\/span>resulting in multiple injuries and fracture on the leg of the claimant. The accident was reported to the Police at Police Station, Kullu on the basis of which FIR was registered under Sections 279, 337 and 338 IPC. On these allegations, the claimant sought compensation to the tune of Rs 10, 00,000.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellant G.L. Palsra took specific stand that the vehicle was sold by him to respondent 4 Dhewa Ram and the possession of the vehicle was also given by him to respondent 4.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Respondent 2 driver of the vehicle admitted that the claimant was travelling in the bus and took defence that he had taken a marriage party of his near relative to village Doghri without any consideration and when the bus reached near Shallang Govt. School, the claimant hurriedly got down in order to answer the call of nature. The driver was slowing down but the claimant opened the door without waiting for the bus to stop and fell down due to his own negligence and sustained injuries.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Counsel Praneet Gupta <\/b>for Respondent 3-Insurance Company took preliminary objections that the driver of the vehicle was not having valid and effective driving licence to drive the vehicle and the vehicle was being plied in contravention to the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act as well as contract of the insurance policy. It was further averred that the vehicle at the relevant time was being plied without route permit, fitness certificate and token tax, etc. It was also averred that the petition had been filed in connivance with respondents 1, 2 and 4.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Advocate Naveen K. Bhardwaj for Respondent 4, Dhewa Ram took the plea that he had sold the vehicle to respondent 2 and had no concern with the said vehicle.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

On the evidence presented before the Tribunal earlier, it awarded compensation of Rs 5, 06,530 along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of petition i.e. 8-5-2008 till realization in favor of the claimant on account of the injuries sustained by him in the accident. The insurance company was directed to deposit the compensation in the first instance and then to recover the same from respondents 1 and 2. Aggrieved by the award so passed by the learned Tribunal, the appellant filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The Court having heard both the parties relied on a Supreme Court Judgment Prakash Chand Daga <\/i>v. Saveta Sharma,\u00a0<\/i>(2019) 2 SCC 747<\/a> observed that the appellant continues to be reflected as owner of the vehicle in the records maintained by the Registering and Licensing Authority and being the registered owner, the appellant is bound to satisfy the award as no transfer of ownership was carried out in accordance with Section 50 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.\u00a0<\/span>[Chaman Lal v. Murat Ram,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine HP 320<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. held that the order of the Tribunal was devoid of any fault on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3067,39852,39850,39854,39849,39853,39851],"class_list":["post-226495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-FIR","tag-liability-to-third-person","tag-registered-owner","tag-registering-and-licensing-authority","tag-rto-records","tag-section-50-of-motor-vehicles-act","tag-transfer-of-vehicle"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. held that the order of the Tribunal was devoid of any fault on the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-04T07:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-06T07:55:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-04T07:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-06T07:55:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. held that the order of the Tribunal was devoid of any fault on the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-03-04T07:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-06T07:55:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/","name":"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-03-04T07:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-06T07:55:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/hp-hc-mere-transfer-of-vehicle-would-not-absolve-the-registered-owner-of-his-liability-to-third-person-s-50-of-motor-vehicles-act-1988-needs-to-be-satisfied\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Mere transfer of vehicle would not absolve the registered owner of his liability to third person; S. 50 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 needs to be satisfied"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":218512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/22\/ker-hc-liability-of-insurer-to-indemnify-third-parties-subsists-unless-insurance-coverage-is-cancelled-and-an-intimation-thereof-has-reached-the-insured\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Liability of insurer to indemnify third parties subsists unless insurance coverage is cancelled and an intimation thereof has reached the insured","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: P.B. Suresh Kumar, J. allowed an appeal filed by the claimant against the insurer in which an award was passed exonerating the liability of the insurer to indemnify the owner. \u00a0In the instant case, the claimant sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident and claimed for indemnity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215831,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/18\/jhar-hc-person-authorized-to-drive-a-vehicle-by-its-owner-when-dies-covered-under-the-insurance-policy-on-same-terms-and-conditions-as-applicable-to-the-owner-of-the-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Person authorized to drive a vehicle by its owner, when dies \u2013\u00a0 covered under insurance policy on same terms and conditions, as applicable to the owner of vehicle","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. allowed an appeal made by an insurance company regarding their extent of liability towards a deceased as mentioned in the insurance policy. An FIR was lodged by the owner of a vehicle wherein it was stated that a person (deceased) was authorized to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/19\/refusal-registered-owner-surrender-registration-certificate-mandatory-conditions-under-s-51-5-mv-act-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":2},"title":"Whether refusal of registered owner to surrender registration certificate or his abscondence, is mandatory to exercise power under S. 51 (5) of MV Act? Allahabad HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In case the certificate was lying in the vehicle at the time it was repossessed, the impugned order directing for the vehicle to be registered in the name of the financier would not cause any prejudice nor could be said to be contrary to any provisions of law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/08\/madras-hc-can-mact-deal-with-claims-policies-other-than-accident-claims-provisions-of-mv-act-contractual-statutory-liability-cannot-be-equated-hc-elaborates\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Can MACT deal with claims & policies other than Accident Claims provisions of MV Act? Contractual & Statutory liability cannot be equated: HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0S.M. Subramaniam, J., while addressing a motor accident claim, observed that, Once, the policy is contractual in nature and the parties have signed the agreement, then such a contract cannot be construed or brought within the ambit of statutory liability. The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/chh-hc-impugned-order-absolving-the-liability-on-insurance-company-was-set-aside-due-to-erroneous-dismissal-of-application-under-order-8-rule-13-cpc-regarding-production-of-license\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Impugned order absolving the liability on insurance company was set aside due to erroneous dismissal of application under Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC regarding production of license","author":"Editor","date":"December 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., set aside the impugned order and fastened the liability for compensation on the insurance company. The facts of the case are such that on 16-11-2008 at about 06:30 p.m. Respondent 1\/ claimant was travelling on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":309686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":226495,"position":5},"title":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe registered owner cannot absolve himself of the liability by contending that he has transferred the offending vehicle to a third person prior to the date of the accident.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226495\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}