{"id":226322,"date":"2020-02-28T14:00:37","date_gmt":"2020-02-28T08:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226322"},"modified":"2020-03-03T11:56:28","modified_gmt":"2020-03-03T06:26:28","slug":"hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua J. dismissed both writ petitions filed by the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant case is represented by the counsel Devender K. Sharma for petitioners; and Bipin C. Negi with Komal Chaudhary for Respondent 1, Ashok Sharma with J.K. Verma, Adarsh K. Sharma, Ritta Goswami and Nand Lal Thakur, for Respondent 2 and K.D. Shreedhar with Shreya Chauhan for Respondent 3.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, High Court of Himachal Pradesh issued a notification dated 16-04-2019 inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment as Additional District and Sessions Judges in H.P. Judicial Service in the cadre of District Judges\/Additional District Judges. The petitioners have been working as Senior Sub Judges\/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Central Project Coordinator, respectively, since 22-04-2019 and having more than seven years of experience as Judicial Officers and also as Advocates before becoming Judicial Officers, and in terms of Article 233 (2) of the Constitution of India, the time spent as an Advocate in the Bar considering them eligible in view of the total period spent by them in the legal profession and judicial service submitted their respective applications. The respondent High Court rejected the eligibility of the petitioners; hence, the two writ petitions have been filed, in one seeking directions to respondent 1 to accept the petitioners&#8217; candidatures for H.P. Higher Judicial Services Examination and a another a writ of mandamus to amend Rule 5 (c) of the H.P. Higher Judicial Services Rules, 2004 and also the Notification dated 16-04-2019 for the direct recruitment of District Judges 2019, being inconsistent with Article 233 (2) of the Constitution of India and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on the Judgment given in <em>Dheeraj Mor v. High Court of Delhi, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/m1jU6t0F\">2018 4 SCC 619<\/a>, that the members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of judiciary, are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In addition to the aforesaid position, it would be pertinent to state paragraph no. 47 of the said judgment:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(iv) For the purpose of Article 233 (2), an Advocate has to be continuing in practice for not less than 7 years as on the cutoff date and at the time of appointment as District Judge. Members of judicial service having 7 years&#8217; experience of practice before they have joined the service of having combined experience of 7 years as lawyer and member of judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(v) The rules framed by the High Court prohibiting judicial service officers from staking claim to the post of District Judge against the posts reserved for Advocates by way of direct recruitment, cannot be said to be ultra vires and are in conformity with Articles 14, 16 and 233 of the Constitution of India.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In light of the facts and grounds discussed hereinabove, the Court held that both the petitions hold no merit and should be dismissed. [Dhiru Thakur v. High Court of Himachal Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A3yc6Cb9\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 275<\/b><\/a>, decided on 25-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua J. dismissed both writ petitions filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33065,28724,3516,39804],"class_list":["post-226322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-direct-recruitment","tag-district-judge","tag-judicial_service","tag-member-of-judiciary"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua J. dismissed both writ petitions filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":540,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Direct Recruitment\",\"District Judge\",\"judicial service\",\"Member of Judiciary\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/28\\\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua J. dismissed both writ petitions filed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge","datePublished":"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/"},"wordCount":540,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","keywords":["Direct Recruitment","District Judge","judicial service","Member of Judiciary"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/","name":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-02-28T08:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-03T06:26:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/hp-hc-members-of-judicial-service-having-a-combined-experience-of-seven-years-as-lawyer-and-member-of-judiciary-are-not-eligible-to-apply-for-direct-recruitment-as-a-district-judge\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Members of judicial service having a combined experience of seven years as lawyer and member of Judiciary are not eligible to apply for direct recruitment as a District Judge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/15\/hp-hc-seven-years-continuous-practice-not-required-by-advocate-for-additional-district-and-sessions-judge-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":0},"title":"Seven years \u2018continuous\u2019 practice is not required by an Advocate for Additional District and Sessions Judge appointment: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Arushi","date":"July 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Respondent 4 was in active practice and possessed cumulatively more than 7 years of active practice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/members-of-subordinate-judiciary-cant-claim-direct-recruitment-to-the-district-judge-post-under-quota-meant-for-practicing-advocates\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":1},"title":"Members of subordinate judiciary can&#8217;t claim direct recruitment to the District judge post under quota meant for practicing advocates","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ has held that members of the judicial service of any State cannot claim to be appointed for vacancies in the cadre of District Judge, in the quota earmarked for appointment from amongst eligible Advocates, under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/04\/hp-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-age-limit-for-assistant-district-attorneys-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":2},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Petition challenging Prescribed Age Limit for  appointment of Assistant District Attorneys","author":"Editor","date":"July 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that the State Government was well within its powers to carve out exceptions for a particular category of post, in so far as the prescription of age limit by direct recruitment to a was concerned.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/23\/hp-hc-suit-land-being-inherited-by-wife-through-will-lost-its-character-of-joint-hindu-coparcenary-property-in-view-of-s-14-of-hindu-succession-act-1956-court-denied-rights-to-ch\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Suit land being inherited by wife through \u2018Will\u2019 lost its character of Joint Hindu Coparcenary Property in view of S.14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Court denied rights to children","author":"Editor","date":"October 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Sandeep Sharma J., upheld the impugned judgment on merits. The facts of the case are such that the suit land is an ancestral property of late Prema who inherited the property from his late father, and after his (Prema\u2019s) death transferred the property through a will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310560,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/thc-advocates-practicing-in-other-states-ineligible-for-post-of-district-judge-in-state-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;Advocates practicing in other states ineligible for post of District Judge\u2019; Telangana HC upholds Rule 5(1)(a) of Telangana State Judicial (Service and Cadre) Rules, 2023","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe object of enactment of the Telangana State Judicial (Service and Cadre) Rules, 2023 is to recruit suitable candidates to Telangana State Judicial Service who are acquainted with the practice of local Courts in Telangana and have the knowledge of local laws.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230986,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/17\/hp-hc-bail-for-offence-under-ndps-act-rejected-where-balance-of-convenience-not-in-favour-of-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":226322,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Bail for offence under NDPS Act rejected where balance of convenience not in favour of accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Vivek Singh Thakur, J. rejected bail and dismissed the petition. The facts of the case are that, the petitioner, a driver by profession resident of Haryana was apprehended for alleged possession of 1 Kilogram 008 Grams of opium and was arrested under Section 18 of Narcotic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226322"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226322\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}