{"id":226312,"date":"2020-02-28T01:43:22","date_gmt":"2020-02-27T20:13:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226312"},"modified":"2020-02-28T17:08:40","modified_gmt":"2020-02-28T11:38:40","slug":"lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/","title":{"rendered":"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The bench of AM Khanwilkar and <strong>Dinesh Maheshwari<\/strong>, JJ has restored the NCLT order wherein it was held that the lenders of Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) were not the financial creditors of the corporate debtor Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL) and that the transactions in question were to defraud the lenders of the corporate debtor JIL. The Court held,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201csuch lenders of JAL, on the strength of the mortgages in question, may fall in the category of secured creditors, but such mortgages being neither towards any loan, facility or advance to the corporate debtor nor towards protecting any facility or security of the corporate debtor, it cannot be said that the corporate debtor owes them any \u2018financial debt\u2019 within the meaning of Section 5(8) of the Code; and hence, such lenders of JAL do not fall in the category of the \u2018financial creditors\u2019 of the corporate debtor JIL.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was hearing the case relating to JAL, a public listed company with more than 5 lakh individual shareholders, which was facing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. In the year 2003, JAL was awarded the rights for construction of an expressway from Noida to Agra. A concession agreement was entered into with the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority. Coming on the heels of this project, JIL was set up as a special purpose vehicle. Finance was obtained from a consortium of banks against the partial mortgage of land acquired and a pledge of 51% of the shareholding held by JAL. The banks in question instituted a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before the NCLT, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against JIL, while alleging that JIL had committed a default in repayment of its dues to the tune of Rs. 526.11 crore.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">NCLT in it\u2019s order held,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cthe transactions in question were to defraud the lenders of the corporate debtor JIL, as 858 acres of unencumbered land owned by the corporate debtor to secure the debt of the related party JAL was mortgaged in the midst of the corporate debtor\u2019s immense financial crunch, while continuing with default towards the home buyers and financial creditors and after it had been declared as Non Performing Asset, in utter disregard to fiduciary duties and duty of care to the creditors; and further that the mortgage of land was created without any counter guarantee from the related party and with no other consideration being paid to the corporate debtor.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While interpreting Section 43 of the Code, the Supreme Court noticed that the transfers in question could be considered outside the purview of sub-section (2) of Section 43 of the Code only if it could be shown that same were made in the \u2018ordinary course of business or financial affairs\u2019 of the corporate debtor JIL and the transferees. It, however, further explained that even when furnishing a security may be one of normal business practices, it would become a part of \u2018ordinary course of business\u2019 of a particular corporate entity only if it falls in place as part of \u2018the undistinguished common flow of business done\u2019; and is not arising out of \u2018any special or particular situation\u2019.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cIt is difficult to even surmise that the business of JIL, of ensuring execution of the works assigned to its holding company and for execution of housing\/building projects, in its ordinary course, had inflated itself to the extent of routinely mortgaging its assets and\/or inventories to secure the debts of its holding company. It had also not been the ordinary course of financial affairs of JIL that it would create encumbrances over its properties to secure the debts of its holding company.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Holding that the NCLAT had not been right in interfering with the well-considered and justified order passed by NCLT, the Supreme Court said,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cthe transactions in question are hit by Section 43 of the Code and the Adjudicating Authority, having rightly held so, had been justified in issuing necessary directions in terms of Section 44 of the Code.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, hence, concluded:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left; padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201c1) The impugned order dated 01.08.2019 as passed by NCLAT in the batch of appeals is reversed and is set aside.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left; padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>2) The appeals preferred before NCLAT against the order dated 16.05.2018, as passed by NCLT on the application filed by IRP, are dismissed; and consequently, the order dated 16.05.2018 so passed by NCLT is upheld in regard to the findings that the transactions in question are preferential within 171 the meaning of Section 43 of the Code. The directions by NCLT for avoidance of such transactions are also upheld accordingly.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left; padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>3) The appeals preferred before NCLAT against the orders passed by NCLT dated 09.05.2018 and 15.05.2018 on the applications filed by the lender banks are also dismissed and the respective orders passed by NCLT are restored with the findings that the applicants are not the financial creditors of the corporate debtor Jaypee Infratech Limited.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Anuj Jain v. Axis Bank Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t4BCf0IO\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine SC 237<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26.02.2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has restored the NCLT order wherein it was held that the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[6131,22814,25934,30361,6121,11641,2742],"class_list":["post-226312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bankruptcy","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-financial-creditor","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency","tag-mortgage","tag-Non_performing_asset"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has restored the NCLT order wherein it was held that the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-27T20:13:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-28T11:38:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/\",\"name\":\"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-27T20:13:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-28T11:38:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL","og_description":"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has restored the NCLT order wherein it was held that the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-27T20:13:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-28T11:38:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/","name":"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2020-02-27T20:13:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-28T11:38:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/28\/lending-banks-of-jaypraksah-associates-not-financial-creditors-sc-directs-return-of-mortgaged-land-to-jil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lending Banks of Jaypraksah Associates not \u2018financial creditors\u2019; SC directs return of mortgaged land to JIL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/24\/adjudicating-authority-under-ibc-may-disapprove-the-resolution-plan-approved-by-the-committee-of-creditors-but-cannot-modify-it-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":0},"title":"Adjudicating authority under IBC may disapprove the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors but cannot modify it: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an important ruling relating to the corporate insolvency resolution process concerning the corporate debtor, Jaypee Infratech Limited, the 3-judge bench of AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has granted further 45 days for submission of the modified\/fresh resolution plans by the resolution applicants, for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/nclat-relief-for-consortium-of-banks-which-extended-loans-to-jaiprakash-associates-nclt-order-cancelling-mortgage-of-858-acres-of-land-by-jil-in-favour-of-banks-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Relief for Consortium of Banks which extended loans to Jaiprakash Associates, NCLT order cancelling mortgage of 858 acres of land by JIL in favour of Banks quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A 2-Member Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), set aside the order of National Company Law Tribunal (Allahabad), whereby it had cancelled the mortgage of 858 acres of land worth around Rs 5900 crores made by Jaypee Infratech\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286685,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/nclt-relieves-homebuyers-by-upholding-suraksha-realtys-resolution-plan-in-jaypee-infratech-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":2},"title":"[Relief for Homebuyers] NCLT approves resolution plan of Suraksha Realty in Jaypee Infratech case","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The National Company Law Tribunal (Delhi Bench) passed orders in favour of aggrieved homebuyers ordering JAL\/JIL\/Jaypee\/RP to continue with adjusting the delay compensation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/can-spectrum-licence-be-treated-as-an-asset-in-the-cirp-initiated-by-a-creditor-under-insolvency-bankruptcy-code-2016-union-of-india-v-vijaykumar-v-iyer-a-case-comment\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":3},"title":"Can Spectrum Licence be Treated as an Asset in the CIRP Initiated by a Creditor Under Insolvency &#038; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 | Union of India v. Vijaykumar V. Iyer: A case comment","author":"Editor","date":"April 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tarun Gulati\u2020 and Madhav Goel\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1015.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1015.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1015.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1015.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/the-status-of-personal-guarantors-under-indian-insolvency-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":4},"title":"Status of Personal Guarantors under Indian Insolvency Laws","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Muskaan Garg\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Op Ed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/OpEd_by_Muskaan_Garg.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/OpEd_by_Muskaan_Garg.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/OpEd_by_Muskaan_Garg.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/OpEd_by_Muskaan_Garg.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/OpEd_by_Muskaan_Garg.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/13\/operational-creditor-be-paid-equivalent-amount-under-sec-53-ibc-in-liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":226312,"position":5},"title":"Operational Creditors must be paid equivalent amount as per Section 53 of the IBC in case of liquidation of Corporate Debtor: SC","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. would be treated as a secured creditor in terms of Section 52 and 53 of the IBC, and would be entitled to retain the security interest in the pledged shares.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"payment to operational creditors under ibc","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/payment-to-operational-creditors-under-ibc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/payment-to-operational-creditors-under-ibc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/payment-to-operational-creditors-under-ibc.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/payment-to-operational-creditors-under-ibc.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226312\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}